Literature DB >> 23466517

New biomaterial as a promising alternative to silicone breast implants.

Goy Teck Lim1, Stephanie A Valente, Cherie R Hart-Spicer, Mary M Evancho-Chapman, Judit E Puskas, Walter I Horne, Steven P Schmidt.   

Abstract

One in eight American women develops breast cancer. Of the many patients requiring mastectomy yearly as a consequence, most elect some form of breast reconstruction. Since 2006, only silicone breast implants have been approved by the FDA for the public use. Unfortunately, over one-third of women with these implants experience complications as a result of tissue-material biocompatibility issues, which may include capsular contracture, calcification, hematoma, necrosis and implant rupture. Our group has been working on developing alternatives to silicone. Linear triblock poly(styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene) (SIBS) polymers are self-assembling nanostructured thermoplastic rubbers, already in clinical practice as drug eluting stent coatings. New generations with a branched (arborescent or dendritic) polyisobutylene core show promising potential as a biomaterial alternative to silicone rubber. The purpose of this pre-clinical research was to evaluate the material-tissue interactions of a new arborescent block copolymer (TPE1) in a rabbit implantation model compared to a linear SIBS (SIBSTAR 103T) and silicone rubber. This study is the first to compare the molecular weight and molecular weight distribution, tensile properties and histological evaluation of arborescent SIBS-type materials with silicone rubber before implantation and after explantation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23466517     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  3 in total

1.  Surface changes of nanotopography by carbon ion implantation to enhance the biocompatibility of silicone rubber: an in vitro study of the optimum ion fluence and adsorbed protein.

Authors:  Xianhui Li; Xin Zhou; Yao Chen; Shu Yu; Xin Chen; Xin Xia; Xiaohua Shi; Yiming Zhang; Dongli Fan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Biocompatibility evaluation of a thermoplastic rubber for wireless telemetric intracranial pressure sensor coating.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Andrea C Charif; Judit E Puskas; Hannah Phillips; Kaitlyn J Shanahan; Jessica Garsed; Aaron Fleischman; Ken Goldman; Shuvo Roy; Matthew T Luebbers; Stephen M Dombrowski; Mark G Luciano
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-02-03

Review 3.  Bioactive Polymeric Materials for the Advancement of Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Anthony Iovene; Yuwen Zhao; Shue Wang; Kagya Amoako
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2021-02-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.