Literature DB >> 23466438

Impact of precision of Bayesian network parameters on accuracy of medical diagnostic systems.

Agnieszka Oniśko1, Marek J Druzdzel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: One of the hardest technical tasks in employing Bayesian network models in practice is obtaining their numerical parameters. In the light of this difficulty, a pressing question, one that has immediate implications on the knowledge engineering effort, is whether precision of these parameters is important. In this paper, we address experimentally the question whether medical diagnostic systems based on Bayesian networks are sensitive to precision of their parameters. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The test networks include Hepar II, a sizeable Bayesian network model for diagnosis of liver disorders and six other medical diagnostic networks constructed from medical data sets available through the Irvine Machine Learning Repository. Assuming that the original model parameters are perfectly accurate, we lower systematically their precision by rounding them to progressively courser scales and check the impact of this rounding on the models' accuracy.
RESULTS: Our main result, consistent across all tested networks, is that imprecision in numerical parameters has minimal impact on the diagnostic accuracy of models, as long as we avoid zeroes among parameters.
CONCLUSION: The experiments' results provide evidence that as long as we avoid zeroes among model parameters, diagnostic accuracy of Bayesian network models does not suffer from decreased precision of their parameters.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23466438      PMCID: PMC4486041          DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  16 in total

1.  Knowledge discovery approach to automated cardiac SPECT diagnosis.

Authors:  L A Kurgan; K J Cios; R Tadeusiewicz; M Ogiela; L S Goodenday
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.326

2.  Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis; symbolic logic, probability, and value theory aid our understanding of how physicians reason.

Authors:  R S LEDLEY; L B LUSTED
Journal:  Science       Date:  1959-07-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Bayesian networks in biomedicine and health-care.

Authors:  Peter J F Lucas; Linda C van der Gaag; Ameen Abu-Hanna
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Probabilistic diagnosis using a reformulation of the INTERNIST-1/QMR knowledge base. I. The probabilistic model and inference algorithms.

Authors:  M A Shwe; B Middleton; D E Heckerman; M Henrion; E J Horvitz; H P Lehmann; G F Cooper
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  Dynamic decision analysis in medicine: a data-driven approach.

Authors:  C Cao; T Y Leong; A P Leong; F C Seow
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  The distribution of sums of rounded percentages.

Authors:  F Mosteller; C Youtz; D Zahn
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1967-06

7.  Experience with a model of sequential diagnosis.

Authors:  G A Gorry; G O Barnett
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1968-05

8.  A probabilistic and decision-theoretic approach to the management of infectious disease at the ICU.

Authors:  P J Lucas; N C de Bruijn; K Schurink; A Hoepelman
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.326

9.  Probabilities for a probabilistic network: a case study in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  L C van der Gaag; S Renooij; C L M Witteman; B M P Aleman; B G Taal
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.326

10.  Dynamic Bayesian networks as prognostic models for clinical patient management.

Authors:  Marcel A J van Gerven; Babs G Taal; Peter J F Lucas
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 6.317

View more
  5 in total

1.  A new Bayesian network-based risk stratification model for prediction of short-term and long-term LVAD mortality.

Authors:  Natasha A Loghmanpour; Manreet K Kanwar; Marek J Druzdzel; Raymond L Benza; Srinivas Murali; James F Antaki
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

2.  Clinical Trial Adaptation by Matching Evidence in Complementary Patient Sub-groups of Auxiliary Blinding Questionnaire Responses.

Authors:  Ognjen Arandjelović
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Cardiac Health Risk Stratification System (CHRiSS): a Bayesian-based decision support system for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy.

Authors:  Natasha A Loghmanpour; Marek J Druzdzel; James F Antaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  PI Prob: A risk prediction and clinical guidance system for evaluating patients with recurrent infections.

Authors:  Nicholas L Rider; Gina Cahill; Tina Motazedi; Lei Wei; Ashok Kurian; Lenora M Noroski; Filiz O Seeborg; Ivan K Chinn; Kirk Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  An explainable artificial intelligence approach for predicting cardiovascular outcomes using electronic health records.

Authors:  Sergiusz Wesołowski; Gordon Lemmon; Edgar J Hernandez; Alex Henrie; Thomas A Miller; Derek Weyhrauch; Michael D Puchalski; Bruce E Bray; Rashmee U Shah; Vikrant G Deshmukh; Rebecca Delaney; H Joseph Yostl; Karen Eilbeck; Martin Tristani-Firouzi; Mark Yandell
Journal:  PLOS Digit Health       Date:  2022-01-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.