Literature DB >> 23466037

Validation of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of shearwave elastography: Phantom study.

Han Song Mun1, Seon Hyeong Choi, Shin Ho Kook, Yoonjung Choi, Woo Kyoung Jeong, Yongsoo Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess intra- and interobserver reproducibility of quantitative ultrasound (US) elastography for breast masses using shearwave elastography (SWE).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The US elastography phantom was used. This training phantom contained 12 masses with dimensions from 6 to 11mm and varying B-mode (hypo- iso- and hyperechoic) characteristics and viscoelastic properties varying from about 50 to 250kPa. Four attending radiologists participated as operators and used Supersonic Imaging 15-4 MHz array to acquire images. In each session, B-mode US features were assessed once and US elastography values were assessed twice in a consecutive and distinct manner. A total of three identical sessions of data acquisition were performed at 2-week intervals. For categorical variables such as BI-RADS features of mass on B-mode image and qualitative SWE features, kappa (k) values were calculated by the generalized linear mixed model. For continuous variables, kPa, and ratio, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated.
RESULTS: Interobserver agreement for SWE image similarity was moderate (k=0.57). With respect to quantitative SWE values, intraobserver ICCs were 0.65, 0.77, 0.92, and 0.91 for maximum elasticity; 0.70, 0.83, 0.94, and 0.94 for mean elasticity; and 0.67, 0.83, 0.92, and 0.92 for elasticity ratio for operators 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Interobserver reproducibility showed good agreement with ICC values of 0.77 for maximum elasticity, 0.82 for mean elasticity, and 0.79 for elasticity ratio.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative US elastography for breast masses was highly reproducible with good agreement across operators. With respect to intraobserver reproducibility, ICC values varied but three out of four operators showed good agreement.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23466037     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  10 in total

1.  Non-invasive biomechanical characterization of intervertebral discs by shear wave ultrasound elastography: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Claudio Vergari; Philippe Rouch; Guillaume Dubois; Dominique Bonneau; Jean Dubousset; Mickael Tanter; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Shear-wave elastography quantitative assessment of the male breast: added value to distinguish benign and malignant palpable masses.

Authors:  Amandine Crombé; Gabrielle Hurtevent-Labrot; Maryam Asad-Syed; Jean Palussière; Gaetan MacGrogan; Michèle Kind; Stéphane Ferron
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  2D shear wave elastography in evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Claudio Ventura; Silvia Baldassarre; Federico Cerimele; Laura Pepi; Elisabetta Marconi; Paola Ercolani; Chiara Floridi; Giulio Argalia; Gaia Goteri; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 6.313

4.  Added value of deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis and shear wave elastography to b-mode ultrasound for evaluation of breast masses detected by screening ultrasound.

Authors:  Min Young Kim; Soo-Yeon Kim; Yeon Soo Kim; Eun Sil Kim; Jung Min Chang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Axially- and torsionally-polarized radially converging shear wave MRE in an anisotropic phantom made via Embedded Direct Ink Writing.

Authors:  Martina Guidetti; Marco Andrea Zampini; Yizhou Jiang; Chiara Gambacorta; Joshua P Smejkal; Joseph Crutison; Yayue Pan; Dieter Klatt; Thomas J Royston
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-03-31

6.  Prospective Validation of Intra- and Interobserver Reproducibility of a New Point Shear Wave Elastographic Technique for Assessing Liver Stiffness in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease.

Authors:  Su Joa Ahn; Jeong Min Lee; Won Chang; Sang Min Lee; Hyo-Jin Kang; Hyunkyung Yang; Jeong Hee Yoon; Sae Jin Park; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Reproducibility of shear wave elastography among operators, machines, and probes in an elasticity phantom.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Ibrahim Alrashed; Abdulrahman M Alfuraih
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2020-05-09

8.  Accuracy and reproducibility of shear wave elastography according to the size and elasticity of lesions: A phantom study.

Authors:  Harim Kim; Haejung Kim; Boo-Kyung Han; Ji Soo Choi; Eun Sook Ko; Eun Young Ko
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Practice guideline for the performance of breast ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Su Hyun Lee; Jung Min Chang; Nariya Cho; Hye Ryoung Koo; Ann Yi; Seung Ja Kim; Ji Hyun Youk; Eun Ju Son; Seon Hyeong Choi; Shin Ho Kook; Jin Chung; Eun Suk Cha; Jeong Seon Park; Hae Kyoung Jung; Kyung Hee Ko; Hye Young Choi; Eun Bi Ryu; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2013-11-26

10.  Shear Wave Elastography: Is It a Valuable Additive Method to Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Small (≤2 cm) Breast Cancer?

Authors:  So Jung Kim; Kyung Hee Ko; Hae Kyoung Jung; Hyerin Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.