| Literature DB >> 23465493 |
Phyllis N Butow1, Lynley Aldridge, Melanie L Bell, Ming Sze, Maurice Eisenbruch, Michael Jefford, Penelope Schofield, Afaf Girgis, Madeleine King, Priya Duggal-Beri, Joshua McGrane, David Goldstein.
Abstract
This study compared health-related quality of life (QOL) and psychological morbidity in a population-based sample of first generation immigrant and Anglo-Australian cancer survivors. Eligible participants, recruited via three State Cancer Registries, included those: with a new diagnosis of one of 12 most incident cancers (all stages) 1-6years earlier; aged 18-80 at diagnosis; born in a Chinese, Arabic, or Greek speaking country and able to speak one of these languages. A random sample of English-speaking Anglo-Australian-born controls frequency matched for cancer diagnosis was recruited. 596 patients (277 of whom were immigrants) participated (a 26% response rate). In multiple linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, education, marital status, socio-economic status, time since diagnosis and type of cancer, immigrants had clinically significantly worse QOL (5.4-8.5 points on Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), P<0·0001), higher depression (P<0·0001) and higher incidence of clinical depression (P<0·01) than Anglo-Australians. Understanding the health system partially mediated this relationship for depression (P=0·0004) and QOL (P=0·001). Immigrant survivors of cancer have worse psychological and QOL outcomes than Anglo-Australians. Potential targets for intervention include assistance in navigating the health system, translated information and cultural competency training for health professionals.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23465493 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.01.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Cancer ISSN: 0959-8049 Impact factor: 9.162