BACKGROUND: There is controversy whether asymptomatic vasospasm in other arteries should be concurrently treated (global treatment) in patients receiving targeted endovascular treatment [percutaneous-transluminal-angioplasty (PTA) and/or intra-arterial (IA) vasodilators] for focal symptomatic vasospasm. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of occurrence of new symptomatic vasospasm in previously asymptomatic arterial distributions among patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) who underwent targeted endovascular treatment for focal symptomatic vasospasm. METHODS: We identified all patients with SAH who had received targeted endovascular treatment during a 4-year period. We ascertained any new occurrence of symptomatic vasosopasm requiring endovascular treatment in previously unaffected (and untreated) arterial distributions within the same hospitalization. Blinded reviewers quantitatively graded angiographic vasospasm (<25, 26-49, ≥50 %) in all major arteries for each patient at the time of targeted treatment. RESULTS: Of the 41 patients who received targeted endovascular treatment (PTA in 41 % and vasodilators in 59 %), 11 (27 %) developed new symptomatic vasospasm in previously asymptomatic vascular distributions requiring endovascular treatment. Moderate severity of angiographic vasospasm in asymptomatic arteries at the time of targeted treatment tended to predict the occurrence of new symptomatic vasospasm. The rate of death and disability at discharge [modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 3-6] was 82 % (9/11) among those who developed a new episode of symptomatic vasospasm compared with 70 % (21/30) in those who did not (P = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: High risk of new occurrence of ischemic symptoms in previously asymptomatic (and untreated) arterial distributions among patients receiving targeted treatment should be recognized. Further studies should evaluate the benefit of performing global endovascular treatment during the initial targeted endovascular treatment session.
BACKGROUND: There is controversy whether asymptomatic vasospasm in other arteries should be concurrently treated (global treatment) in patients receiving targeted endovascular treatment [percutaneous-transluminal-angioplasty (PTA) and/or intra-arterial (IA) vasodilators] for focal symptomatic vasospasm. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of occurrence of new symptomatic vasospasm in previously asymptomatic arterial distributions among patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) who underwent targeted endovascular treatment for focal symptomatic vasospasm. METHODS: We identified all patients with SAH who had received targeted endovascular treatment during a 4-year period. We ascertained any new occurrence of symptomatic vasosopasm requiring endovascular treatment in previously unaffected (and untreated) arterial distributions within the same hospitalization. Blinded reviewers quantitatively graded angiographic vasospasm (<25, 26-49, ≥50 %) in all major arteries for each patient at the time of targeted treatment. RESULTS: Of the 41 patients who received targeted endovascular treatment (PTA in 41 % and vasodilators in 59 %), 11 (27 %) developed new symptomatic vasospasm in previously asymptomatic vascular distributions requiring endovascular treatment. Moderate severity of angiographic vasospasm in asymptomatic arteries at the time of targeted treatment tended to predict the occurrence of new symptomatic vasospasm. The rate of death and disability at discharge [modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 3-6] was 82 % (9/11) among those who developed a new episode of symptomatic vasospasm compared with 70 % (21/30) in those who did not (P = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: High risk of new occurrence of ischemic symptoms in previously asymptomatic (and untreated) arterial distributions among patients receiving targeted treatment should be recognized. Further studies should evaluate the benefit of performing global endovascular treatment during the initial targeted endovascular treatment session.
Authors: Paul T Akins; Yekaterina Axelrod; Syed Arshad; Jonathan Hartman; Cheng Ji; Jeremy Ciporen; Mark W Hawk Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: E Sander Connolly; Alejandro A Rabinstein; J Ricardo Carhuapoma; Colin P Derdeyn; Jacques Dion; Randall T Higashida; Brian L Hoh; Catherine J Kirkness; Andrew M Naidech; Christopher S Ogilvy; Aman B Patel; B Gregory Thompson; Paul Vespa Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: J M Eskridge; W McAuliffe; J K Song; A V Deliganis; D W Newell; D H Lewis; M R Mayberg; H R Winn Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Marike Zwienenberg-Lee; Jonathan Hartman; Nancy Rudisill; Lori Kennedy Madden; Karen Smith; Joseph Eskridge; David Newell; Bon Verweij; M Ross Bullock; Andrew Baker; William Coplin; Robert Mericle; Jian Dai; David Rocke; J Paul Muizelaar Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-04-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Qaisar A Shah; Muhammad Zeeshan Memon; M Fareed K Suri; Gustavo J Rodriguez; Osman S Kozak; Robert A Taylor; Ramachandra P Tummala; Gabriela Vazquez; Alexandros L Georgiadis; Adnan I Qureshi Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2009-04-16 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Jenna L Leclerc; Spiros Blackburn; Dan Neal; Nicholas V Mendez; Jeffrey A Wharton; Michael F Waters; Sylvain Doré Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 11.205