OBJECTIVE: With increasing use electronic health records (EHR) in the USA, we looked at the predictive values of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9) coding system for surveillance of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The chronic HBV cohort from the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study was created based on electronic health records (EHR) of adult patients who accessed services from 2006 to 2008 from four healthcare systems in the USA. Using the gold standard of abstractor review to confirm HBV cases, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values using one qualifying ICD-9 code versus using two qualifying ICD-9 codes separated by 6 months or greater. RESULTS: Of 1 652 055 adult patients, 2202 (0.1%) were confirmed as having chronic HBV. Use of one ICD-9 code had a sensitivity of 83.9%, positive predictive value of 61.0%, and specificity and negative predictive values greater than 99%. Use of two hepatitis B-specific ICD-9 codes resulted in a sensitivity of 58.4% and a positive predictive value of 89.9%. DISCUSSION: Use of one or two hepatitis B ICD-9 codes can identify cases with chronic HBV infection with varying sensitivity and positive predictive values. CONCLUSIONS: As the USA increases the use of EHR, surveillance using ICD-9 codes may be reliable to determine the burden of chronic HBV infection and would be useful to improve reporting by state and local health departments.
OBJECTIVE: With increasing use electronic health records (EHR) in the USA, we looked at the predictive values of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9) coding system for surveillance of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The chronic HBV cohort from the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study was created based on electronic health records (EHR) of adult patients who accessed services from 2006 to 2008 from four healthcare systems in the USA. Using the gold standard of abstractor review to confirm HBV cases, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values using one qualifying ICD-9 code versus using two qualifying ICD-9 codes separated by 6 months or greater. RESULTS: Of 1 652 055 adult patients, 2202 (0.1%) were confirmed as having chronic HBV. Use of one ICD-9 code had a sensitivity of 83.9%, positive predictive value of 61.0%, and specificity and negative predictive values greater than 99%. Use of two hepatitis B-specific ICD-9 codes resulted in a sensitivity of 58.4% and a positive predictive value of 89.9%. DISCUSSION: Use of one or two hepatitis B ICD-9 codes can identify cases with chronic HBV infection with varying sensitivity and positive predictive values. CONCLUSIONS: As the USA increases the use of EHR, surveillance using ICD-9 codes may be reliable to determine the burden of chronic HBV infection and would be useful to improve reporting by state and local health departments.
Authors: Emily E Sickbert-Bennett; David J Weber; Charles Poole; Pia D M MacDonald; Jean-Marie Maillard Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Melissa K Schaefer; Katherine Ellingson; Craig Conover; Alicia E Genisca; Donna Currie; Tina Esposito; Laura Panttila; Peter Ruestow; Karen Martin; Diane Cronin; Michael Costello; Stephen Sokalski; Scott Fridkin; Arjun Srinivasan Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Cindy M Weinbaum; Ian Williams; Eric E Mast; Susan A Wang; Lyn Finelli; Annemarie Wasley; Stephanie M Neitzel; John W Ward Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2008-09-19
Authors: J R Kramer; J A Davila; E D Miller; P Richardson; T P Giordano; H B El-Serag Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2007-11-08 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Ewoudt M W van de Garde; Jan Jelrik Oosterheert; Marc Bonten; Robert C Kaplan; Hubert G M Leufkens Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2007-02-23 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Michael Klompas; Gillian Haney; Daniel Church; Ross Lazarus; Xuanlin Hou; Richard Platt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-07-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jordan L Kennedy; Dana L Haberling; Chaorui C Huang; Fernanda C Lessa; David E Lucero; Demetre C Daskalakis; Neil M Vora Journal: Chest Date: 2019-04-29 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Anne C Moorman; Loralee B Rupp; Stuart C Gordon; Yuna Zhong; Jian Xing; Mei Lu; Joseph A Boscarino; Mark A Schmidt; Yihe G Daida; Eyasu H Teshale; Philip R Spradling; Scott D Holmberg Journal: Infect Dis Clin North Am Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 5.982
Authors: Abdool S Yasseen; Jeffrey C Kwong; Rafal Kustra; Laura Holder; Hannah Chung; Liane Macdonald; Naveed Z Janjua; Tony Mazzulli; Jordan Feld; Natasha S Crowcroft Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2021-01-08
Authors: Steven Erly; D Allen Roberts; Roxanne Kerani; H Nina Kim; Robert Harrington; Shireesha Dhanireddy; Rena Patel Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2020-11-18