Lisa M Rosen1, Tao Liu, Roland C Merchant. 1. Department of Community Health, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blood and body fluid exposures are frequently evaluated in emergency departments (EDs). However, efficient and effective methods for estimating their incidence are not yet established. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of estimating statewide ED visits for blood or body fluid exposures using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), code searches. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a database of ED visits for blood or body fluid exposure. SETTING: EDs of 11 civilian hospitals throughout Rhode Island from January 1, 1995, through June 30, 2001. PATIENTS: Patients presenting to the ED for possible blood or body fluid exposure were included, as determined by prespecified ICD-9 codes. METHODS: Positive predictive values (PPVs) were estimated to determine the ability of 10 ICD-9 codes to distinguish ED visits for blood or body fluid exposure from ED visits that were not for blood or body fluid exposure. Recursive partitioning was used to identify an optimal subset of ICD-9 codes for this purpose. Random-effects logistic regression modeling was used to examine variations in ICD-9 coding practices and styles across hospitals. Cluster analysis was used to assess whether the choice of ICD-9 codes was similar across hospitals. RESULTS: The PPV for the original 10 ICD-9 codes was 74.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.2%-75.7%), whereas the recursive partitioning analysis identified a subset of 5 ICD-9 codes with a PPV of 89.9% (95% CI, 88.9%-90.8%) and a misclassification rate of 10.1%. The ability, efficiency, and use of the ICD-9 codes to distinguish types of ED visits varied across hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Although an accurate subset of ICD-9 codes could be identified, variations across hospitals related to hospital coding style, efficiency, and accuracy greatly affected estimates of the number of ED visits for blood or body fluid exposure.
BACKGROUND: Blood and body fluid exposures are frequently evaluated in emergency departments (EDs). However, efficient and effective methods for estimating their incidence are not yet established. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of estimating statewide ED visits for blood or body fluid exposures using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), code searches. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a database of ED visits for blood or body fluid exposure. SETTING: EDs of 11 civilian hospitals throughout Rhode Island from January 1, 1995, through June 30, 2001. PATIENTS: Patients presenting to the ED for possible blood or body fluid exposure were included, as determined by prespecified ICD-9 codes. METHODS: Positive predictive values (PPVs) were estimated to determine the ability of 10 ICD-9 codes to distinguish ED visits for blood or body fluid exposure from ED visits that were not for blood or body fluid exposure. Recursive partitioning was used to identify an optimal subset of ICD-9 codes for this purpose. Random-effects logistic regression modeling was used to examine variations in ICD-9 coding practices and styles across hospitals. Cluster analysis was used to assess whether the choice of ICD-9 codes was similar across hospitals. RESULTS: The PPV for the original 10 ICD-9 codes was 74.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.2%-75.7%), whereas the recursive partitioning analysis identified a subset of 5 ICD-9 codes with a PPV of 89.9% (95% CI, 88.9%-90.8%) and a misclassification rate of 10.1%. The ability, efficiency, and use of the ICD-9 codes to distinguish types of ED visits varied across hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Although an accurate subset of ICD-9 codes could be identified, variations across hospitals related to hospital coding style, efficiency, and accuracy greatly affected estimates of the number of ED visits for blood or body fluid exposure.
Authors: Cristina Varas-Lorenzo; Jordi Castellsague; Mary Rose Stang; Luis Tomas; Jaume Aguado; Susana Perez-Gutthann Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Kimberly J O'Malley; Karon F Cook; Matt D Price; Kimberly Raiford Wildes; John F Hurdle; Carol M Ashton Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Roland C Merchant; Kenneth H Mayer; Bruce M Becker; Allison K Delong; Joseph W Hogan Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Reena Mahajan; Anne C Moorman; Stephen J Liu; Loralee Rupp; R Monina Klevens Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 4.497