Literature DB >> 23462298

A qualitative analysis of parturients' perspectives on neuraxial labor analgesia.

P Toledo1, J Sun, F Peralta, W A Grobman, C A Wong, R Hasnain-Wynia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The decision to use, or not use, neuraxial analgesia is complex and likely multi-factorial. The objectives of this study were to understand parturients' concerns about neuraxial analgesia, and the reasons for not anticipating the use of neuraxial analgesia using qualitative methodology.
METHODS: English-speaking, term parturients, who had not requested or received labor analgesia, were recruited for this mixed-methods study. In addition to a quantitative survey, the results of which have been published elsewhere, women were asked open-ended questions regarding concerns about neuraxial analgesia and reasons for not anticipating its use. Answers were recorded verbatim and analyzed using qualitative methodology.
RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 509 women. Thirty-nine percent of patients expressed some concern about neuraxial analgesia. These concerns were thematically represented by misunderstandings about neuraxial analgesia, general fears about the procedure, and lack of trust in providers. Many of the concerns were misunderstandings that were not supported by the medical literature. Of the 129 patients who did not anticipate using neuraxial analgesia, 23% stated that this was because they desired a natural childbirth and/or control over their labor experience, whereas 46% cited concerns about the procedure and its complications as the basis for their decision.
CONCLUSION: Many women who anticipate not using neuraxial analgesia may be basing their decision on an inaccurate understanding of the risks of the procedure. Improved patient education and counseling that target specific areas of concern may address these misunderstandings.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23462298     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth        ISSN: 0959-289X            Impact factor:   2.603


  7 in total

1.  No association of labor epidural analgesia with cerebral palsy in children.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Jove H Graham; Wen Feng; Meredith W Lewis; Xiaopeng Zhang; H Lester Kirchner
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Parturients' Stated Preferences for Labor Analgesia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Semra Ozdemir; Teresa Chen; Chin Wen Tan; Wei Han Melvin Wong; Hon Sen Tan; Eric Andrew Finkelstein; Ban Leong Sng
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Differences in the Frequency of Use of Epidural Analgesia between Immigrant Women of Turkish Origin and Non-Immigrant Women in Germany - Explanatory Approaches and Conclusions of a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  I Petruschke; B Ramsauer; T Borde; M David
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Women's Experiences with Neuraxial Labor Analgesia in the Listening to Mothers II Survey: A Content Analysis of Open-Ended Responses.

Authors:  Laura Attanasio; Katy B Kozhimannil; Judy Jou; Marianne E McPherson; William Camann
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Knowledge, attitudes and use of labour analgesia among women at a low-income country antenatal clinic.

Authors:  Mary T Nabukenya; Andrew Kintu; Agnes Wabule; Mark T Muyingo; Arthur Kwizera
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Readability of internet-sourced patient education material related to "labour analgesia".

Authors:  Nilay Boztas; Dilek Omur; Sule Ozbılgın; Gözde Altuntas; Ersan Piskin; Sevda Ozkardesler; Volkan Hanci
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Allophone immigrant women's knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Melissa Dominicé Dao; Désirée Gerosa; Iris Pélieu; Guy Haller
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.006

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.