Literature DB >> 23461862

D category IV: a group of clinically relevant and phylogenetically diverse partial D.

Inge von Zabern1, Franz F Wagner, Joann M Moulds, John J Moulds, Willy A Flegel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The D typing strategies in several European countries protect carriers of D category VI (DVI) from anti-D immunization but not carriers of other partial D. Besides DVI, one of the clinically most important partial D is D category IV (DIV). A detailed description and direct comparison of the different DIV types was missing. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: RHD nucleotide sequences were determined from genomic DNA. D epitope patterns were established with commercial monoclonal anti-D panels.
RESULTS: DIV comprises several variants of the D antigen with distinct serology, molecular structures, evolutionary origins, and ethnic prevalences. The DIV phenotype is determined by 350H shared by all, but not limited to, DIV variants which are further divided into DIVa and DIVb. The DIVa phenotype is expressed by DIV Type 1.0 harboring 350H and the dispersed amino acids 62F, 137V, and 152T. The DIVb phenotype is expressed by DIV Type 3 to Type 5 representing RHD-CE-D hybrids. Four of the six postulated DIV variants were encountered among 23 DIV samples analyzed. Of 12 DIV carriers with anti-D, 10 were female and seven likely immunized by pregnancy. Two DIV-related alleles are newly described: DWN, which differs from DIV Type 4 by 350D and epitope pattern. DNT carries 152T, known to cause a large D antigen density.
CONCLUSION: DIV alleles arose from at least two independent evolutionary events. DIV Type 1.0 with DIVa phenotype belongs to the oldest extant human RHD alleles. DIV Type 2 to Type 5 with DIVb phenotype arose from more recent gene conversions. Anti-D immunization, especially dreaded in pregnancies, will be avoided not only in carriers of DVI but also in carriers of other D variants like DIV, if our proposed D typing strategy is adopted.
© 2013 American Association of Blood Banks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23461862      PMCID: PMC3681876          DOI: 10.1111/trf.12145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  55 in total

1.  Polymorphisms of RhD(Va) and a new RhD(Va)-like variant found in Japanese individuals.

Authors:  H Hyodo; Y Ishikawa; K Kashiwase; A Ogawa; Y Watanabe; H Tsuneyama; C Toyoda; M Uchikawa; T Akaza; T Fujii; S Kozuma; Y Taketani; T Juji
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.144

Review 2.  The Rh blood group system: a review.

Authors:  N D Avent; M E Reid
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  PCR screening for common weak D types shows different distributions in three Central European populations.

Authors:  T H Müller; F F Wagner; A Trockenbacher; N I Eicher; W A Flegel; D Schönitzer; F Schunter; C Gassner
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Observations on subdivisions of the Rh antigen D.

Authors:  P TIPPETT; R SANGER
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1962       Impact factor: 2.144

5.  Outliers in RhD membrane integration are explained by variant RH haplotypes.

Authors:  Xinjian Yu; Franz F Wagner; Bernd Witter; Willy A Flegel
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  In-frame triplet deletions in RHD alter the D antigen phenotype.

Authors:  Willy A Flegel; Nicole I Eicher; Andrea Doescher; Hein Hustinx; Peter Gowland; Behrouz Mansouri Taleghani; Eduard K Petershofen; Ursula Bauerfeind; Manfred Ernst; Ingeborg von Zabern; Hubert Schrezenmeier; Franz F Wagner
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Frequencies of the blood groups ABO, Rhesus, D category VI, Kell, and of clinically relevant high-frequency antigens in south-western Germany.

Authors:  F F Wagner; D Kasulke; M Kerowgan; W A Flegel
Journal:  Infusionsther Transfusionsmed       Date:  1995-10

8.  A structural model for 30 Rh D epitopes based on serological and DNA sequence data from partial D phenotypes.

Authors:  M L Scott; D Voak; J W Jones; N D Avent; W Liu; N Hughes-Jones; H Sonneborn
Journal:  Transfus Clin Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.406

9.  Further observations on the blood factors Rh-A, Rh-B, Rh-C and Rh-D.

Authors:  A S WIENER; L J UNGER
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1962 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Studies on blood factors RhA, RhB, and RhC.

Authors:  L J UNGER; A S WIENER; L KATZ
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1959-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Serological weak D phenotypes: a review and guidance for interpreting the RhD blood type using the RHD genotype.

Authors:  S Gerald Sandler; Leonard N Chen; Willy A Flegel
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  The DAU cluster: a comparative analysis of 18 RHD alleles, some forming partial D antigens.

Authors:  Kshitij Srivastava; Helene Polin; Sherry Lynne Sheldon; Franz Friedrich Wagner; Christoph Grabmer; Christian Gabriel; Gregory Andrew Denomme; Willy Albert Flegel
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  It's time to phase in RHD genotyping for patients with a serologic weak D phenotype. College of American Pathologists Transfusion Medicine Resource Committee Work Group.

Authors:  S Gerald Sandler; Willy A Flegel; Connie M Westhoff; Gregory A Denomme; Meghan Delaney; Margaret A Keller; Susan T Johnson; Louis Katz; John T Queenan; Ralph R Vassallo; Clayton D Simon
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Strategies to identify candidates for D variant genotyping.

Authors:  Xunda Luo; Margaret A Keller; Ian James; Michelle Grant; Shiguang Liu; Kellie Simmons Massey; Andrew Czulewicz; Sandra Nance; Yanhua Li
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 5.  Genotyping in Sickle Cell Disease Patients: The French Strategy.

Authors:  Aline Floch; Christophe Tournamille; Btissam Chami; France Pirenne
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.747

6.  Transfusion strategy for weak D Type 4.0 based on RHD alleles and RH haplotypes in Tunisia.

Authors:  Mouna Ouchari; Kshitij Srivastava; Houda Romdhane; Saloua Jemni Yacoub; Willy Albert Flegel
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  It's time to phase out "serologic weak D phenotype" and resolve D types with RHD genotyping including weak D type 4.

Authors:  Willy A Flegel; Gregory A Denomme; John T Queenan; Susan T Johnson; Margaret A Keller; Connie M Westhoff; Louis M Katz; Meghan Delaney; Ralph R Vassallo; Clayton D Simon; S Gerald Sandler
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.337

8.  'Chameleonic' Serological Findings Leading to Life-Threatening Hemolytic Transfusion Reactions.

Authors:  Ariane Sümnig; Beate Mayer; Volker Kiefel; Andreas Greinacher; Abdulgabar Salama
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.747

9.  The genomic landscape of blood groups in Indigenous Australians in remote communities.

Authors:  Sudhir Jadhao; Wendy Hoy; Simon Lee; Hardip R Patel; Brendan J McMorran; Robert L Flower; Shivashankar H Nagaraj
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.337

10.  Molecular Characteristics of the Serological Weak D Phenotype in Koreans.

Authors:  Dajeong Jeong; Sujin Oh; Eun Young Song; Yun Ji Hong; Kyoung Un Park
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.