INTRODUCTION: Secondhand smoke contains a mixture of pollutants that can persist in air, dust, and on surfaces for months or longer. This persistent residue is known as thirdhand smoke (THS). Here, we detail a simple method of wipe sampling for nicotine as a marker of accumulated THS on surfaces. METHODS: We analyzed findings from 5 real-world studies to investigate the performance of wipe sampling for nicotine on surfaces in homes, cars, and hotels in relation to smoking behavior and smoking restrictions. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient for side-by-side samples was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94). Wipe sampling for nicotine reliably distinguished between private homes, private cars, rental cars, and hotels with and without smoking bans and was significantly positively correlated with other measures of tobacco smoke contamination such as air and dust nicotine. The sensitivity and specificity of possible threshold values (0.1, 1, and 10 μg/m(2)) were evaluated for distinguishing between nonsmoking and smoking environments. Sensitivity was highest at a threshold of 0.1 μg/m(2), with 74%-100% of smoker environments showing nicotine levels above threshold. Specificity was highest at a threshold of 10 μg/m(2), with 81%-100% of nonsmoker environments showing nicotine levels below threshold. The optimal threshold will depend on the desired balance of sensitivity and specificity and on the types of smoking and nonsmoking environments. CONCLUSIONS: Surface wipe sampling for nicotine is a reliable, valid, and relatively simple collection method to quantify THS contamination on surfaces across a wide range of field settings and to distinguish between nonsmoking and smoking environments.
INTRODUCTION: Secondhand smoke contains a mixture of pollutants that can persist in air, dust, and on surfaces for months or longer. This persistent residue is known as thirdhand smoke (THS). Here, we detail a simple method of wipe sampling for nicotine as a marker of accumulated THS on surfaces. METHODS: We analyzed findings from 5 real-world studies to investigate the performance of wipe sampling for nicotine on surfaces in homes, cars, and hotels in relation to smoking behavior and smoking restrictions. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient for side-by-side samples was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94). Wipe sampling for nicotine reliably distinguished between private homes, private cars, rental cars, and hotels with and without smoking bans and was significantly positively correlated with other measures of tobacco smoke contamination such as air and dust nicotine. The sensitivity and specificity of possible threshold values (0.1, 1, and 10 μg/m(2)) were evaluated for distinguishing between nonsmoking and smoking environments. Sensitivity was highest at a threshold of 0.1 μg/m(2), with 74%-100% of smoker environments showing nicotine levels above threshold. Specificity was highest at a threshold of 10 μg/m(2), with 81%-100% of nonsmoker environments showing nicotine levels below threshold. The optimal threshold will depend on the desired balance of sensitivity and specificity and on the types of smoking and nonsmoking environments. CONCLUSIONS: Surface wipe sampling for nicotine is a reliable, valid, and relatively simple collection method to quantify THS contamination on surfaces across a wide range of field settings and to distinguish between nonsmoking and smoking environments.
Authors: Thomas F Northrup; Georg E Matt; Melbourne F Hovell; Amir M Khan; Angela L Stotts Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Peyton Jacob; Neal L Benowitz; Hugo Destaillats; Lara Gundel; Bo Hang; Manuela Martins-Green; Georg E Matt; Penelope J E Quintana; Jonathan M Samet; Suzaynn F Schick; Prue Talbot; Noel J Aquilina; Melbourne F Hovell; Jian-Hua Mao; Todd P Whitehead Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Thomas F Northrup; Peyton Jacob; Neal L Benowitz; Eunha Hoh; Penelope J E Quintana; Melbourne F Hovell; Georg E Matt; Angela L Stotts Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2016 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Thomas F Northrup; Angela L Stotts; Robert Suchting; Amir M Khan; Charles Green; Michelle R Klawans; Penelope J E Quintana; Eunha Hoh; Melbourne F Hovell; Georg E Matt Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Georg E Matt; Penelope J E Quintana; Joy M Zakarian; Eunha Hoh; Melbourne F Hovell; Melinda Mahabee-Gittens; Kayo Watanabe; Kathy Datuin; Cher Vue; Dale A Chatfield Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 7.552