Literature DB >> 14579097

Brain tumour imaging with PET: a comparison between [18F]fluorodopa and [11C]methionine.

Alexander Becherer1, Georgios Karanikas, Monica Szabó, Georg Zettinig, Susanne Asenbaum, Christine Marosi, Christine Henk, Patrick Wunderbaldinger, Thomas Czech, Wolfgang Wadsak, Kurt Kletter.   

Abstract

Imaging of amino acid transport in brain tumours is more sensitive than fluorine-18 2-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET). The most frequently used tracer in this field is carbon-11 methionine (MET), which is unavailable for PET centres without a cyclotron because of its short half-life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[(18)F]fluoro-phenylalanine (FDOPA) in this setting, in comparison with MET. Twenty patients with known supratentorial brain lesions were referred for PET scans with FDOPA and MET. The diagnoses were 18 primary brain tumours, one metastasis and one non-neoplastic cerebral lesion. All 20 patients underwent PET with FDOPA (100 MBq, 20 min p.i.), and 19 of them also had PET scans with MET (800 MBq, 20 min p.i.). In all but one patient a histological diagnosis was available. In 15 subjects, histology was known from previous surgical interventions; in five of these patients, as well as in four previously untreated patients, histology was obtained after PET. In one untreated patient, confirmation of PET was possible solely by correlation with MRI; a histological diagnosis became available 10 months later. MET and FDOPA images matched in all patients and showed all lesions as hot spots with higher uptake than in the contralateral brain. Standardised uptake value ratios, tumour/contralateral side (mean+/-SD), were 2.05+/-0.91 for MET and 2.04+/-0.53 for FDOPA (NS). The benign lesion, which biopsy revealed to be a focal demyelination, was false positive, showing increased uptake of MET and FDOPA. We conclude that FDOPA is accurate as a surrogate for MET in imaging amino acid transport in malignant cerebral lesions for the purpose of visualisation of vital tumour tissue. It combines the good physical properties of (18)F with the pharmacological properties of MET and might therefore be a valuable PET radiopharmaceutical in brain tumour imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14579097     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1259-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  32 in total

Review 1.  Oncological applications of FDG PET imaging.

Authors:  D Delbeke
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Use of PET in neuroendocrine tumors. In vivo applications and in vitro studies.

Authors:  B Eriksson; M Bergström; H Orlefors; A Sundin; K Oberg; B Långström
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-03

3.  Association of rubidium and C-methionine uptake in brain tumors measured by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  U Roelcke; E Radü; S Ametamey; R Pellikka; W Steinbrich; K L Leenders
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Evaluation of l-3-[123I]iodo-alpha-methyltyrosine SPET and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the detection and grading of recurrences in patients pretreated for gliomas at follow-up: a comparative study with stereotactic biopsy.

Authors:  J B Bader; S Samnick; J R Moringlane; W Feiden; A Schaefer; S Kremp; C M Kirsch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-02

5.  18F-DOPA positron emission tomography for tumour detection in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma and elevated calcitonin levels.

Authors:  S Hoegerle; C Altehoefer; N Ghanem; I Brink; E Moser; E Nitzsche
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-01

6.  Aspects of 6-[18F]fluoro-L-DOPA preparation: precursor synthesis, preparative HPLC purification and determination of radiochemical purity.

Authors:  F Füchtner; P Angelberger; H Kvaternik; F Hammerschmidt; B Peric Simovc; J Steinbach
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  11C-methionine uptake in cerebrovascular disease: a comparison with 18F-fDG PET and 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT.

Authors:  Makoto Nakagawa; Yasuo Kuwabara; Masayuki Sasaki; Hirofumi Koga; Tao Chen; Ouichirou Kaneko; Kazutaka Hayashi; Takato Morioka; Kouji Masuda
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.668

8.  Brain tumor protein synthesis and histological grades: a study by positron emission tomography (PET) with C11-L-Methionine.

Authors:  P Bustany; M Chatel; J M Derlon; F Darcel; P Sgouropoulos; F Soussaline; A Syrota
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Assessment of [11C]-L-methionine transport into the human brain.

Authors:  L A O'Tuama; T R Guilarte; K H Douglass; H N Wagner; D F Wong; R F Dannals; H T Ravert; A A Wilson; N D LaFrance; A N Bice
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  Dynamic study of supratentorial gliomas with L-methyl-11C-methionine and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  A Lilja; K Bergström; P Hartvig; B Spännare; C Halldin; H Lundqvist; B Långstrom
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  76 in total

1.  Preclinical characterization of 18F-D-FPHCys, a new amino acid-based PET tracer.

Authors:  Delphine Denoyer; Laura Kirby; Kelly Waldeck; Peter Roselt; Oliver C Neels; Thomas Bourdier; Rachael Shepherd; Andrew Katsifis; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Treatment response evaluation using 18F-FDOPA PET in patients with recurrent malignant glioma on bevacizumab therapy.

Authors:  Johannes Schwarzenberg; Johannes Czernin; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson; Whitney B Pope; Tristan Grogan; David Elashoff; Cheri Geist; Daniel H S Silverman; Michael E Phelps; Wei Chen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Metabolic positron emission tomography imaging in cancer detection and therapy response.

Authors:  Aizhi Zhu; Daniel Lee; Hyunsuk Shim
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 4.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas.

Authors:  Nathalie L Albert; Michael Weller; Bogdana Suchorska; Norbert Galldiks; Riccardo Soffietti; Michelle M Kim; Christian la Fougère; Whitney Pope; Ian Law; Javier Arbizu; Marc C Chamberlain; Michael Vogelbaum; Ben M Ellingson; Joerg C Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Novel Approaches to Imaging Tumor Metabolism.

Authors:  Sui-Seng Tee; Kayvan R Keshari
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 6.  Treating recurrent glioblastoma: an update.

Authors:  Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2015

7.  Value of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)- L-tyrosine PET for the diagnosis of recurrent glioma.

Authors:  Gabriele Pöpperl; Claudia Götz; Walter Rachinger; Franz-Josef Gildehaus; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Klaus Tatsch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Fluorinated tracers for imaging cancer with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Olivier Couturier; André Luxen; Jean-François Chatal; Jean-Philippe Vuillez; Pierre Rigo; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  18F-FDOPA PET/CT for detection of recurrence in patients with glioma: prospective comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Sellam Karunanithi; Punit Sharma; Abhishek Kumar; Bangkim Chandra Khangembam; Guru Pada Bandopadhyaya; Rakesh Kumar; Deepak Kumar Gupta; Arun Malhotra; Chandrasekhar Bal
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  11C-L-methionine positron emission tomography in the clinical management of cerebral gliomas.

Authors:  Tarun Singhal; Tanjore K Narayanan; Viney Jain; Jogeshwar Mukherjee; Joseph Mantil
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.