Literature DB >> 23460136

In vivo and in situ evaluation of a wireless magnetoelastic sensor array for plastic biliary stent monitoring.

Scott R Green1, Richard S Kwon, Grace H Elta, Yogesh B Gianchandani.   

Abstract

This paper presents the in vivo and in situ evaluation of a system that wirelessly monitors the accumulation of biliary sludge in a plastic biliary stent. The sensing element, located within the stent, is a passive array of magnetoelastic resonators that is queried by a wireless electromagnetic signal. The in vivo and in situ testing uses commercially-available plastic biliary stents, each enhanced with an array of ribbon sensors (formed from Metglas™ 2826 MB). The sensor array is approximately 70 mm long and contains individual resonators that are 1 mm in width and have lengths of 10 mm, 14 mm, and 20 mm. The array is anchored into the 2.8 mm inner-diameter stent using a thermal staking technique. For the in situ testing, an instrumented stent is placed in various locations within the abdominal cavity of a female domestic swine carcass to evaluate the wireless range of the system; these results show that a wireless signal can be obtained from a range of at least 7.5 cm from a sensor array covered in bile. The in vivo testing includes the endoscopic implantation of an instrumented stent into the bile duct of a swine. After implantation, the swine was housed for a period of 4 weeks, during which the animal showed no ill effects and followed the expected growth curve from 29 kg to 42 kg. At the conclusion of the in vivo test, the animal was euthanized, and the instrumented stent explanted and examined. The results presented in this paper indicate that the monitoring system does not adversely affect the health of the animal and can feasibly provide sufficient wireless range after implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23460136      PMCID: PMC3738268          DOI: 10.1007/s10544-013-9750-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Microdevices        ISSN: 1387-2176            Impact factor:   2.838


  9 in total

1.  Metallic biliary stents for malignant obstructive jaundice:a review.

Authors:  Richard A Kozarek
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Biliary and pancreatic stents.

Authors:  Lehel Somogyi; Ram Chuttani; Joseph Croffie; James DiSario; Julia Liu; Daniel S Mishkin; Raj Shah; William Tierney; Louis M Wong Kee Song; Bret T Petersen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Plastic biliary stent occlusion: factors involved and possible preventive approaches.

Authors:  Gianfranco Donelli; Emilio Guaglianone; Roberta Di Rosa; Fausto Fiocca; Antonio Basoli
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2007-03

4.  In situ and ex vivo evaluation of a wireless magnetoelastic biliary stent monitoring system.

Authors:  Scott Ryan Green; Richard S Kwon; Grace H Elta; Yogesh B Gianchandani
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.838

Review 5.  Prevention of biliary stent clogging: a clinical review.

Authors:  E D Libby; J W Leung
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  Role of endoprostheses in the management of malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  G K McLean; D R Burke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Bacterial biofilm and clogging of biliary stents.

Authors:  J J Sung
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol       Date:  1995-09

8.  Benign biliary strictures: a review of 21 years of experience.

Authors:  F M Frattaroli; D Reggio; A Guadalaxara; G Illomei; G Pappalardo
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  P H Davids; A K Groen; E A Rauws; G N Tytgat; K Huibregtse
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992 Dec 19-26       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Implantable Sensors for Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Brett S Klosterhoff; Melissa Tsang; Didi She; Keat Ghee Ong; Mark G Allen; Nick J Willett; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Encapsulation Approaches for In-Stent Wireless Magnetoelastic Sensors.

Authors:  Jiqing Jiang; Ramprasad Mohanan Nambisan; Scott Green; Yogesh B Gianchandani
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Fully implantable wireless batteryless vascular electronics with printed soft sensors for multiplex sensing of hemodynamics.

Authors:  Robert Herbert; Hyo-Ryoung Lim; Bruno Rigo; Woon-Hong Yeo
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 14.957

4.  Enabling Angioplasty-Ready "Smart" Stents to Detect In-Stent Restenosis and Occlusion.

Authors:  Xing Chen; Babak Assadsangabi; York Hsiang; Kenichi Takahata
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 5.  The Future of Cardiovascular Stents: Bioresorbable and Integrated Biosensor Technology.

Authors:  Daniel Hoare; Anubhav Bussooa; Steven Neale; Nosrat Mirzai; John Mercer
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 16.806

6.  Predicting Cardiovascular Stent Complications Using Self-Reporting Biosensors for Noninvasive Detection of Disease.

Authors:  Daniel Hoare; Andreas Tsiamis; Jamie R K Marland; Jakub Czyzewski; Mahmut T Kirimi; Michael Holsgrove; Ewan Russell; Steven L Neale; Nosrat Mirzai; Srinjoy Mitra; John R Mercer
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 17.521

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.