M Al-Khaled1, C Matthis, J Eggers. 1. Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The risk of a stroke after a transient ischemic attack (TIA) is high in the short time following a TIA. The German Stroke Society recommends an early hospitalization of patients with TIA preferably in a stroke unit (SU). This study aims to compare the impact of SU care with conventional care (CC) in patients with TIA. METHODS: In a prospective study, during a 36-month phase (starting November 2007), patients with TIA who were admitted to the hospital within 48 h of symptom onset were enrolled. Stroke rate during hospitalization and the 90-day rates of stroke and mortality were studied. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: Of 2,200 patients (mean age, 17.6 ± 12 years, 49% female), 1,347 (61%) treated in a SU and 853 (39%) received CC at general departments. Patients treated in SU were significantly younger than those received a CC (69.9 vs. 71.7 years; P = 0.001). TIA patients treated on SU received more ultrasound investigations of the neck arteries (98 vs. 96%; P = 0.003) and of the brain arteries (97 vs. 82%; P < 0.001) than those of CC. The primary outcomes (stroke during hospitalization, stroke after 90 days, and mortality after 90 days) did not show a difference between the SU and CC groups. In patients of male sex, the 90-day stroke rate was significantly lower in the SU group than the CC group (1.8 vs. 4.5%; P = 0.033). Using the adjusted logistic regression analysis, treatment in a SU revealed a reduction of 90-day stroke rate in patients of male sex (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.95; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The impact of evaluation and treatment of patients with TIA in SU and CC appears to differ only among patients of male sex. Further randomized trials are necessary.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The risk of a stroke after a transient ischemic attack (TIA) is high in the short time following a TIA. The German Stroke Society recommends an early hospitalization of patients with TIA preferably in a stroke unit (SU). This study aims to compare the impact of SU care with conventional care (CC) in patients with TIA. METHODS: In a prospective study, during a 36-month phase (starting November 2007), patients with TIA who were admitted to the hospital within 48 h of symptom onset were enrolled. Stroke rate during hospitalization and the 90-day rates of stroke and mortality were studied. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: Of 2,200 patients (mean age, 17.6 ± 12 years, 49% female), 1,347 (61%) treated in a SU and 853 (39%) received CC at general departments. Patients treated in SU were significantly younger than those received a CC (69.9 vs. 71.7 years; P = 0.001). TIApatients treated on SU received more ultrasound investigations of the neck arteries (98 vs. 96%; P = 0.003) and of the brain arteries (97 vs. 82%; P < 0.001) than those of CC. The primary outcomes (stroke during hospitalization, stroke after 90 days, and mortality after 90 days) did not show a difference between the SU and CC groups. In patients of male sex, the 90-day stroke rate was significantly lower in the SU group than the CC group (1.8 vs. 4.5%; P = 0.033). Using the adjusted logistic regression analysis, treatment in a SU revealed a reduction of 90-day stroke rate in patients of male sex (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.95; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The impact of evaluation and treatment of patients with TIA in SU and CC appears to differ only among patients of male sex. Further randomized trials are necessary.
Entities:
Keywords:
TIA; hospitalization; management; mortality; prognosis; stroke; stroke unit
Authors: Philippa C Lavallée; Elena Meseguer; Halim Abboud; Lucie Cabrejo; Jean-Marc Olivot; Olivier Simon; Mikael Mazighi; Chantal Nifle; Philippe Niclot; Bertrand Lapergue; Isabelle F Klein; Eric Brochet; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Guy Lesèche; Julien Labreuche; Pierre-Jean Touboul; Pierre Amarenco Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Peter M Rothwell; Matthew F Giles; Arvind Chandratheva; Lars Marquardt; Olivia Geraghty; Jessica N E Redgrave; Caroline E Lovelock; Lucy E Binney; Linda M Bull; Fiona C Cuthbertson; Sarah J V Welch; Shelley Bosch; Faye C Alexander; Faye Carasco-Alexander; Louise E Silver; Sergei A Gutnikov; Ziyah Mehta Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-10-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dominique A Cadilhac; Joosup Kim; Natasha A Lannin; Christopher R Levi; Helen M Dewey; Kelvin Hill; Steven Faux; Nadine E Andrew; Monique F Kilkenny; Rohan Grimley; Amanda G Thrift; Brenda Grabsch; Sandy Middleton; Craig S Anderson; Geoffrey A Donnan Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 9.910