AIM: To report an analysis of the concept of perinatal bereavement. BACKGROUND: The concept of perinatal bereavement emerged in the scientific literature during the 1970s. Perinatal bereavement is a practice-based concept, although it is not well-defined in the scientific literature and is often intermingled with the concepts of mourning and grief. DESIGN: Concept Analysis. DATA SOURCES: Using the term 'perinatal bereavement' and limits of only English and human, Pub Med and CINAHL were searched to yield 278 available references dating from 1974-2011. Articles specific to the experience of perinatal bereavement were reviewed. The final data set was 143 articles. REVIEW METHODS: The methods of principle-based concept analysis were used. Results reveal conceptual components (antecedents, attributes and outcomes) which are delineated to create a theoretical definition of perinatal bereavement. RESULTS: The concept is epistemologically immature, with few explicit definitions to describe the phenomenon. Inconsistency in conceptual meaning threatens the construct validity of measurement tools for perinatal bereavement and contributes to incongruent theoretical definitions. This has implications for both nursing science (how the concept is studied and theoretically integrated) and clinical practice (timing and delivery of support interventions). CONCLUSIONS: Perinatal bereavement is a multifaceted global phenomenon that follows perinatal loss. Lack of conceptual clarity and lack of a clearly articulated conceptual definition impede the synthesis and translation of research findings into practice. A theoretical definition of perinatal bereavement is offered as a platform for researchers to advance the concept through research and theory development.
AIM: To report an analysis of the concept of perinatal bereavement. BACKGROUND: The concept of perinatal bereavement emerged in the scientific literature during the 1970s. Perinatal bereavement is a practice-based concept, although it is not well-defined in the scientific literature and is often intermingled with the concepts of mourning and grief. DESIGN: Concept Analysis. DATA SOURCES: Using the term 'perinatal bereavement' and limits of only English and human, Pub Med and CINAHL were searched to yield 278 available references dating from 1974-2011. Articles specific to the experience of perinatal bereavement were reviewed. The final data set was 143 articles. REVIEW METHODS: The methods of principle-based concept analysis were used. Results reveal conceptual components (antecedents, attributes and outcomes) which are delineated to create a theoretical definition of perinatal bereavement. RESULTS: The concept is epistemologically immature, with few explicit definitions to describe the phenomenon. Inconsistency in conceptual meaning threatens the construct validity of measurement tools for perinatal bereavement and contributes to incongruent theoretical definitions. This has implications for both nursing science (how the concept is studied and theoretically integrated) and clinical practice (timing and delivery of support interventions). CONCLUSIONS: Perinatal bereavement is a multifaceted global phenomenon that follows perinatal loss. Lack of conceptual clarity and lack of a clearly articulated conceptual definition impede the synthesis and translation of research findings into practice. A theoretical definition of perinatal bereavement is offered as a platform for researchers to advance the concept through research and theory development.
Authors: Moon Fai Chan; Feng-Lan Lou; David Gordon Arthur; Feng-Lin Cao; Lai Har Wu; Ping Li; Miharu Sagara-Rosemeyer; Loretta Yuet Foon Chung; Li Lui Journal: J Clin Nurs Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.036
Authors: Anna Agnes Ojok Arach; Juliet Kiguli; Victoria Nankabirwa; Noeline Nakasujja; David Mukunya; Milton W Musaba; Agnes Napyo; James K Tumwine; Grace Ndeezi; Joseph Rujumba Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 3.105
Authors: Eloisa Fernández-Ordoñez; María González-Cano-Caballero; Cristina Guerra-Marmolejo; Eloísa Fernández-Fernández; Marina García-Gámez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 3.390