Literature DB >> 23457371

The effect of failure mode and effect analysis on reducing percutaneous coronary intervention hospital door-to-balloon time and mortality in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Feng-Yu Kuo1, Wei-Chun Huang, Kuan-Rau Chiou, Guang-Yuan Mar, Chin-Chang Cheng, Chen-Chi Chung, Han-Lin Tsai, Chen-Hung Jiang, Shue-Ren Wann, Shoa-Lin Lin, Chun-Peng Liu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Door-to-balloon (D2B) time is an important factor in the outcome of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We aimed to use failure mode and effect analysis to reduce the D2B time for patients with STEMI and to improve clinical outcomes.
METHODS: There were three stages in this study. In Stage 0, data collected from 2005-2006 was used to identify failures in the process, and during Stage 2 (2007) and Stage 3 (2008) the efficacy of intrahospital and interhospital strategies to reduce the D2B time were evaluated. This study enrolled 385 patients; 86 from 2005-2006; 80 in 2007; and 219 in 2008.
RESULTS: By making improvements in these steps, the median D2B time was reduced from 146 min to 32 min for all patients. The proportion of patients with a D2B time of <90 min significantly increased from Stage 0 to Stage 1 and from Stage 1 to Stage 2, for all patients as well as for the non-transferred and transferred subgroups of patients (all p values <0.0001). For non-transferred patients, only reinfarction-free survival showed significant difference among the three stages (p=0.0225), and for transferred patients, only overall survival showed significant difference among the three stages (p=0.0322). Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis showed Stage 2 was associated with a lower risk of reinfarction and mortality compared with Stage 0.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found that failure mode and effect analysis is a powerful method for identifying weaknesses in D2B processes and evaluating strategies to reduce the D2B time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Checklists; Clinical Practice Guidelines; Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23457371     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  3 in total

1.  Hospital-Based Quality Improvement Interventions for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ehete Bahiru; Anubha Agarwal; Mark A Berendsen; Abigail S Baldridge; Tecla Temu; Amy Rogers; Carey Farquhar; Frederick Bukachi; Mark D Huffman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-09-06

2.  Changing Practice Pattern of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Taiwan from 2008 to 2015.

Authors:  Yi-Heng Li; Yu-Wei Chiu; Jun-Jack Cheng; I-Chang Hsieh; Ping-Han Lo; Meng-Huan Lei; Kwo-Chang Ueng; Fu-Tien Chiang; Shih-Hsien Sung; Jen-Yuan Kuo; Ching-Pei Chen; Wen-Ter Lai; Wen-Lieng Lee; Jyh-Hong Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.672

3.  Failure mode and effects analysis drastically reduced potential risks in clinical trial conduct.

Authors:  Howard Lee; Heechan Lee; Jungmi Baik; Hyunjung Kim; Rachel Kim
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.162

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.