Literature DB >> 23456987

Thoracoscopic lobectomy: is a training program feasible with low postoperative morbidity?

Andrea Billè1, Lawrence Okiror, Wolfram Karenovics, Debajeet Choudhuri, Tom Routledge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of training program in video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy comparing intraoperative and postoperative data of patients operated on by an established consultant and trainees.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive patients who underwent VATS lobectomies between May 2008 and May 2012. 66 patients were operated on by an established consultant (Group A) and 34 by trainees (Group B).
RESULTS: The groups were comparable for clinical characteristics and pathological staging. The mean operating time in Group A was 125 ± 30 min and in Group B was 133 ± 26 min (p = 0.18). The rate of conversion was similar in both groups: 9.1% in Group A and 8.8% in Group B (p = 0.6). The complication rate was comparable (p = 0.4): 36.3% in Group A and 32.3% in Group B. Median time to drain removal and median length of hospital stay was 3 and 5.5 days in Group A and 3 and 5 days in Group B, showing no statistical differences between the two groups (p = 0.3 and 0.5). There were no differences in term of long-term complications between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that a training program in VATS lobectomy is feasible, without increasing the operative time, conversion rate, postoperative complication, time to drain removal, and length of hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23456987     DOI: 10.1007/s11748-013-0225-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1863-6705


  19 in total

1.  Learning curve associated with VATS lobectomy.

Authors:  René H Petersen; Henrik J Hansen
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

2.  Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation?

Authors:  R J McKenna; R K Wolf; M Brenner; R J Fischel; P Wurnig
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery with mediastinal node sampling for lung cancer.

Authors:  R J McKenna
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Acute phase responses following minimal access and conventional thoracic surgery.

Authors:  S R Craig; H A Leaver; P L Yap; G C Pugh; W S Walker
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  VATS lobectomy reduces cytokine responses compared with conventional surgery.

Authors:  A P Yim; S Wan; T W Lee; A A Arifi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy facilitates the delivery of chemotherapy after resection for lung cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca P Petersen; DuyKhanh Pham; William R Burfeind; Steven I Hanish; Eric M Toloza; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Evolution to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy after training: initial results of the first 30 patients.

Authors:  Thomas Ng; Beth A Ryder
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Raja M Flores; Bernard J Park; Joseph Dycoco; Anna Aronova; Yael Hirth; Nabil P Rizk; Manjit Bains; Robert J Downey; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery major lung resection can be safely taught to trainees.

Authors:  Innes Y P Wan; Kin Hoi Thung; Michael K Y Hsin; Malcolm J Underwood; Anthony P C Yim
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Safety and efficacy of video-assisted versus conventional lung resection for lung cancer.

Authors:  Farhood Farjah; Douglas E Wood; Michael S Mulligan; Bahirathan Krishnadasan; Patrick J Heagerty; Rebecca Gaston Symons; David R Flum
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  5 in total

1.  VATS lobectomy program: the trainee perspective.

Authors:  Alberto Sandri; Pier Luigi Filosso; Paolo Olivo Lausi; Enrico Ruffini; Alberto Oliaro
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Access instruments for video assisted surgery: combination of mini-invasivity and universality.

Authors:  Giovanni De Caridi; Mafalda Massara; Raffaele Serra; Francesco Monaco; Filippo Benedetto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  National adoption of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: the Italian VATS register evaluation.

Authors:  Duilio Divisi; Luca Bertolaccini; Mirko Barone; Dario Amore; Desideria Argnani; Gino Zaccagna; Piergiorgio Solli; Gaetano Di Rienzo; Carlo Curcio; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Postoperative pain in thoracic surgery: re-evaluating the benefits of VATS when coupled with epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Toshiro Obuchi; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Toshihiko Moroga; Naofumi Miyahara; Akinori Iwasaki
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Video-assisted thoracic bronchial sleeve lobectomy with bronchoplasty for treatment of lung cancer confined to a single lung lobe: a case series of Chinese patients.

Authors:  Daping Yu; Yi Han; Shijie Zhou; Xiaoyun Song; Yunsong Li; Ning Xiao; Zhidong Liu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 1.637

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.