Literature DB >> 9930466

Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation?

R J McKenna1, R K Wolf, M Brenner, R J Fischel, P Wurnig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the public perceives video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) as advantageous because it is less invasive than a thoracotomy, the medical community has questioned the safety of VATS lobectomy and its adequacy as a cancer operation. Reported series have not been able to address these issues because follow-up has been only short-term.
METHODS: A multiinstitutional, retrospective review was performed in 298 consecutive patients who underwent VATS for a standard anatomic lobectomy with lymph node dissection for lung cancer. Pathologic staging was I in 233 (78%), II in 27 (9%), and IIIA in 38 (13%) patients. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed.
RESULTS: The conversion rate from VATS lobectomy to thoracotomy was 6%, but none were for massive intraoperative bleeding. The only death (0.3%) was because of mesenteric venous thrombosis. Forty minor complications occurred in 38 patients (12.8%) undergoing VATS. The mean and median lengths of stay were 5+/-3.39 and 4 days, respectively. Recurrence in an incision occurred in 1 patient (0.3%). The Kaplan Meier 4-year survival for stage I was 70%+/-5%.
CONCLUSION: The VATS lobectomy for bronchogenic carcinoma appears to be a safe operation, with the same survival as expected for a lobectomy done by thoracotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9930466     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01166-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  31 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer 7: management of lung cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  R Booton; M Jones; N Thatcher
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) anatomic lung resection.

Authors:  Danny Chu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Outcomes of a hybrid technique for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pulmonary resection in a community setting.

Authors:  Roger H Kim; Kazuaki Takabe; Charles G Lockhart
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Video-atlas of thoracoscopic formal lung resections emulating traditional open techniques - Editor's comments.

Authors:  Kumud Dhital
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

5.  Current costs of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Authors:  Tunc Lacin; Scott Swanson
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Comparison in prognosis after VATS lobectomy and open lobectomy for stage I lung cancer: retrospective analysis focused on a histological subgroup.

Authors:  S Sawada; E Komori; M Yamashita; M Nakata; R Nishimura; N Teramoto; Y Segawa; T Shinkai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection aimed at solo surgery for primary lung cancer.

Authors:  Katsuo Yamada; Shinji Kato
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-06-18

8.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: focus on technique.

Authors:  Raja M Flores
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  VATS lobectomy program: the trainee perspective.

Authors:  Alberto Sandri; Pier Luigi Filosso; Paolo Olivo Lausi; Enrico Ruffini; Alberto Oliaro
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Video-assisted lobectomy for a lung cancer patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Koizumi; Shuji Haraguchi; Tomomi Hirata; Kyoji Hirai; Iwao Mikami; Mitsuhiro Fukushima; Daisuke Okada; Shigeki Yamagishi; Yuki Nakajima; Shigeo Tanaka
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.