Literature DB >> 23454254

Vascular and ureteral anatomy relative to the midsacral promontory.

Meadow M Good1, Travis A Abele, Sunil Balgobin, T Ignacio Montoya, Donald McIntire, Marlene M Corton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to further characterize the vascular and ureteral anatomy relative to the midsacral promontory, a landmark often used during sacrocolpopexy, and suggest strategies to avoid complications. STUDY
DESIGN: Distances between the right ureter, aortic bifurcation, and iliac vessels to the midsacral promontory were examined in 25 unembalmed female cadavers and 100 computed tomography (CT) studies. Data were analyzed using Pearson χ(2), unpaired Student t test, and analysis of covariance.
RESULTS: The average distance between the midsacral promontory and right ureter was 2.7 cm (range, 1.6-3.8 cm) in cadavers and 2.9 cm (range, 1.7-5.0 cm) on CT (P = .209). The closest cephalad vessel to the promontory was the left common iliac vein, the average distance being 2.7 cm (range, 0.95-4.75 cm) in cadavers and 3.0 cm (range, 1.0-6.1 cm) on CT (P = .289). The closest vessel to the right of the promontory was the internal iliac artery, with the average distance of 2.5 cm (range, 1.4-3.9 cm) in cadavers and 2.2 cm (range, 1.2-3.9 cm) on CT (P = .015). The average distance from the promontory to the aortic bifurcation was 5.3 cm (range, 2.8-9.7 cm) in cadavers and 6.6 cm (range, 3.1-10.1 cm) on CT (P < .001). The average distance from the aortic bifurcation to the inferior margin of the left common iliac vein was 2.3 cm (range, 1.2-3.9 cm) in cadavers and 3.5 cm (range, 1.7-5.6 cm) on CT (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: The right ureter, right common iliac artery, and left common iliac vein are found within 3 cm from the midsacral promontory. A thorough understanding of the extensive variability in vascular and ureteral anatomy relative to the midsacral promontory should help avoid serious intraoperative complications during sacrocolpopexy.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23454254     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  The umbilicus: a reliable surface landmark for the aortic bifurcation?

Authors:  Lukas Attwell; Sarah Rosen; Bhavin Upadhyay; Peter Gogalniceanu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Effect of mesh width on apical support after sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Sunil Balgobin; Joseph L Fitzwater; Donald D McIntire; Imelda J Delgado; Clifford Y Wai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  An Augmented Reality Endoscope System for Ureter Position Detection.

Authors:  Feng Yu; Enmin Song; Hong Liu; Yunlong Li; Jun Zhu; Chih-Cheng Hung
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Correlation of patient age with CT-measured aorta-sacral promontory distance.

Authors:  Anubhav Agrawal; Aly Abayazeed; Sean L Francis; Jocelyn Tolentino; Donald R Ostergard; Albert Seow; Eric Van Bogaert; Timothy Rose; Nicolette E Deveneau; Ali Azadi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications.

Authors:  Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chunbo Li; Zhiyuan Dai; Huimin Shu
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Surgical treatments for vaginal apical prolapse.

Authors:  Mi Kyung Kong; Sang Wook Bai
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2016-07-13

8.  Laparoscopic monolateral suspension for vaginal vault prolapse: a report of an exit surgical strategy during sacralcolpopexy.

Authors:  Federico Romano; Andrea Sartore; Denise Mordeglia; Giovanni Di Lorenzo; Guglielmo Stabile; Giuseppe Ricci
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.