Literature DB >> 23454055

Why the dish makes a difference: quantitative comparison of polystyrene culture surfaces.

Adam S Zeiger1, Benjamin Hinton, Krystyn J Van Vliet.   

Abstract

There is wide anecdotal recognition that biological cell viability and behavior can vary significantly as a function of the source of commercial tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) culture vessels to which those cells adhere. However, this marked material dependency is typically resolved by selecting and then consistently using the same manufacturer's product - following protocol - rather than by investigating the material properties that may be responsible for such experimental variation. Here, we quantified several physical properties of TCPS surfaces obtained from a wide range of commercial sources and processing steps, through the use of atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based imaging and analysis, goniometry and protein adsorption quantification. We identify qualitative differences in surface features, as well as quantitative differences in surface roughness and wettability that cannot be attributed solely to differences in surface chemistry. We also find significant differences in cell morphology and proliferation among cells cultured on different TCPS surfaces, and resolve a correlation between nanoscale surface roughness and cell proliferation rate for both cell types considered. Interestingly, AFM images of living adherent cells on these nanotextured surfaces demonstrate direct interactions between cellular protrusions and topographically distinct features. These results illustrate and quantify the significant differences in material surface properties among these ubiquitous materials, allowing us to better understand why the dish can make a difference in biological experiments.
Copyright © 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23454055     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  13 in total

Review 1.  Environmental preconditioning rejuvenates adult stem cells' proliferation and chondrogenic potential.

Authors:  Ming Pei
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  One size does not fit all: developing a cell-specific niche for in vitro study of cell behavior.

Authors:  Milos Marinkovic; Travis J Block; Rubie Rakian; Qihong Li; Exing Wang; Matthew A Reilly; David D Dean; Xiao-Dong Chen
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 11.583

3.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of surface nanoarchitecture from two-dimensional datasets.

Authors:  Veselin Boshkovikj; Hayden K Webb; Vy T H Pham; Christopher J Fluke; Russell J Crawford; Elena P Ivanova
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Cellular Responses Modulated by FGF-2 Adsorbed on Albumin/Heparin Layer-by-Layer Assemblies.

Authors:  Marta Kumorek; Dana Kubies; Elena Filová; Milan Houska; Naresh Kasoju; Eliška Mázl Chánová; Roman Matějka; Markéta Krýslová; Lucie Bačáková; František Rypáček
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Serum proteins are extracted along with monolayer cells in plasticware and interfere with protein analysis.

Authors:  Xin Hong; Yuling Meng; Steven N Kalkanis
Journal:  J Biol Methods       Date:  2016-08-13

6.  Customizable Implant-specific and Tissue-Specific Extracellular Matrix Protein Coatings Fabricated Using Atmospheric Plasma.

Authors:  Fei Tan; Mohamed Al-Rubeai
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-09-27

7.  Osteoblast lineage cells can discriminate microscale topographic features on titanium-aluminum-vanadium surfaces.

Authors:  Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Sharon L Hyzy; Mark E Berg; Jennifer M Schneider; Kelly Hotchkiss; Zvi Schwartz; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Development of an elastic cell culture substrate for a novel uniaxial tensile strain bioreactor.

Authors:  Matthew D Moles; Colin A Scotchford; Alastair Campbell Ritchie
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) thin films can act as autologous cell carriers for skin tissue engineering.

Authors:  Aleksandra Zuber; Julia Borowczyk; Eliza Zimolag; Malgorzata Krok; Zbigniew Madeja; Elzbieta Pamula; Justyna Drukala
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.787

Review 10.  The Evolution of Polystyrene as a Cell Culture Material.

Authors:  Max J Lerman; Josephine Lembong; Shin Muramoto; Greg Gillen; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 6.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.