Literature DB >> 23453183

Preliminary report on a new, fully covered, metal stent designed for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections.

Natsuyo Yamamoto1, Hiroyuki Isayama, Hiroshi Kawakami, Naoki Sasahira, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Yukiko Ito, Naminatsu Takahara, Rie Uchino, Koji Miyabayashi, Suguru Mizuno, Hirofumi Kogure, Takashi Sasaki, Yousuke Nakai, Masaki Kuwatani, Kenji Hirano, Minoru Tada, Kazuhiko Koike.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transluminal treatment of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC) has been reported as an effective alternative approach to surgical treatment. A wide, short stent with an anti-migration system has been developed.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a newly developed, fully covered, self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) customized for cystogastrostomy.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical centers and affiliated hospitals. PATIENTS: Nine patients who underwent endoscopic treatment of PFCs (5 with pseudocysts and 4 with walled-off pancreatic necrosis). INTERVENTION: Stent deployment after endoscopic US-guided puncture. Irrigation and necrosectomy were performed at the discretion of the endoscopist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Technical and clinical success rate, complications, and removability.
RESULTS: The FCSEMS was inserted successfully in all cases (9/9, 100%). Clinical success was achieved in 7 of 9 cases (77.8%). No early complications associated with the procedure were observed. Late complications were observed in 2 cases (bleeding and asymptomatic migration). The FCSEMS was removed without any complications in all 6 cases where it was attempted after the procedure had been completed (100%). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective evaluation of a small number of cases. The FCSEMS was always inserted via the transgastric route. Follow-up duration was short.
CONCLUSION: The endoscopic approach that uses this new FCSEMS is feasible for the treatment of PFCs. However, further evaluation is required.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23453183     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  34 in total

1.  Electrocautery vs non-electrocautery dilation catheters in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided pancreatic fluid collection drainage.

Authors:  Katsuya Kitamura; Akira Yamamiya; Yu Ishii; Tomohiro Nomoto; Tadashi Honma; Hitoshi Yoshida
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-07-10

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasound guided interventional procedures.

Authors:  Vishal Sharma; Surinder S Rana; Deepak K Bhasin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-10

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments: are we getting evidence based--a systematic review.

Authors:  Carlo Fabbri; Carmelo Luigiano; Andrea Lisotti; Vincenzo Cennamo; Clara Virgilio; Giancarlo Caletti; Pietro Fusaroli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Efficacy and safety of metallic stents in comparison to plastic stents for endoscopic drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Rajesh Panwar; Preet Mohinder Singh
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-18

Review 5.  Endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic disease.

Authors:  Christopher W Teshima; Gurpal S Sandha
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Comparison of clinical efficacies and safeties of lumen-apposing metal stent and conventional-type metal stent-assisted EUS-guided pancreatic wall-off necrosis drainage: a real-life experience in a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Siu Tong Law; Carlos De La SernaHiguera; Paula Gil Simón; Manuel Pérez-MirandaCastillo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Increased Incidence of Pseudoaneurysm Bleeding With Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents Compared to Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents in Patients With Peripancreatic Fluid Collections.

Authors:  Bryan Brimhall; Samuel Han; Philip D Tatman; Toshimasa J Clark; Sachin Wani; Brian Brauer; Steven Edmundowicz; Mihir S Wagh; Augustin Attwell; Hazem Hammad; Raj J Shah
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage with Lumen-apposing Metal Stents or Plastic Double-pigtail Stents: A Multifactorial Analysis.

Authors:  Nan Ge; Jinlong Hu; Siyu Sun; Enqiang Linghu; Zhendong Jin; Zhaoshen Li
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2017-12-29

9.  Novel lumen-apposing metal stent for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: An Italian multicentre experience.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Petrone; Livia Archibugi; Edoardo Forti; Rita Conigliaro; Roberto Di Mitri; Ilaria Tarantino; Carlo Fabbri; Alberto Larghi; Sabrina Gloria Giulia Testoni; Massimiliano Mutignani; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-06-17       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents.

Authors:  Vanessa Falk; Sana Kenshil; Simrat Sandha; Christopher Teshima; Pernilla D'Souza; Gurpal Sandha
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.