Literature DB >> 23453093

Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience.

Oriol Rodriguez-Leor1, Eduard Fernandez-Nofrerias, Xavier Carrillo, Josepa Mauri, Carolina Oliete, Maria del Carmen Rivas, Antoni Bayes-Genis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of the transradial approach (TRA) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has increased in recent years. TRA has a lower mortality rate than the transfemoral approach (TFA) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Comparative studies have systematically excluded patients with cardiogenic shock (CS).
METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational registry study of consecutive patients undergoing emergent revascularization between February 2007 and January 2012. An analysis of the clinical evolution of patients with CS during hospitalization was performed.
RESULTS: Of 1,400 emergency procedures, 122 had CS, of which 80 underwent PCI by TRA (65.6%) and 42 underwent PCI by TFA (34.3%). The main reason for choosing TFA was the absence of radial pulse (54.9%). Mortality (64.3% vs 32.5%, P = .001), serious access site complications (11.9% vs 2.5%, P = .03), access site complications requiring blood transfusion (7.1% vs 0%, P = .04), and major adverse cardiac events (death, infarction, stroke, serious bleeding, and postanoxic encephalopathy) (73.8% vs 43.8%, P = .001) were greater in patients treated by TFA. In the multivariate analysis, TRA was a predictor of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.39 [0.15-0.97]); other predictive factors were age ≥75 years (3.47 [1.35-8.92]), previous treatment with diuretics (3.67 [1.21-11.12]), and success of the procedure (0.07 [0.02-0.24]).
CONCLUSIONS: Transradial approach for PCI is possible and safe in up to two-thirds of patients with CS. Absence of radial pulse was the main factor preventing use of TRA. In multivariate analysis, TRA was associated with a lower risk of mortality.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23453093     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  10 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of radial to femoral PCI in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sumeet Gandhi; Ron Kakar; Christopher B Overgaard
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Outcomes of transradial primary percutaneous intervention from a tertiary cardiac centre in Turkey.

Authors:  Seref Ulucan; Zeynettin Kaya; Ahmet Keser; Hüseyin Katlandur; Hüseyin Özdil; İsmail Ateş; Mehmet S Ulgen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

3.  Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Junaid Ahsan; Soban Ahmad; Azka Latif; Noman Lateef; Mohammad Zoraiz Ahsan; Waiel Abusnina; Sandeep Nathan; S Elissa Altin; Dhaval S Kolte; John C Messenger; Mark Tannenbaum; Andrew M Goldsweig
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-05

4.  The Role of the Transradial Approach for Complex Coronary Interventions in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Sasko Kedev
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2013-08

5.  Is Radial Access and Transradial Cardiac Catheterization Feasible without the Use of Any Vasodilator?

Authors:  Cemil Izgi; Hasan Feray
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-03

Review 6.  Transradial Artery Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Matthew S Schoenfeld; Ibrahim Kassas; Binita Shah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-24

7.  Improved in-hospital outcome for radial access in a large contemporary cohort of primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Matthias Hasun; Jakob Dörler; Hannes F Alber; Axel Bauer; Rudolf Berger; Günter Christ; Matthias Frick; Uta C Hoppe; Kurt Huber; Gudrun Lamm; Elisabeth Laßnig; Dirk von Lewinski; Anna Rab; Franz X Roithinger; Herwig Schuchlenz; Peter Siostrzonek; Johann Sipötz; Thomas Stefenelli; Clemens Steinwender; Michael Edlinger; Franz Weidinger
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

8.  Clinical Review: Management of Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Fatema Ahmed Ali; Hasan Altahoo; Mary Lynch
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2021-01-14

9.  Impact of guidewire selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure in transradial angiography.

Authors:  Jianmin Yang; Ningfu Wang; Xiaoshan Tong; Xianhua Ye; Liang Zhou; Guoxin Tong; Yun Shen; Shuzheng Lv
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  Antithrombotic Regimens for Patients Taking Oral Anticoagulation After Coronary Intervention: A Meta-analysis of 16 Clinical Trials and 9,185 Patients.

Authors:  Xiao-Fei Gao; Yan Chen; Zhong-Guo Fan; Xiao-Min Jiang; Zhi-Mei Wang; Bing Li; Wen-Xing Mao; Jun-Jie Zhang; Shao-Liang Chen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.882

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.