BACKGROUND: Social stress is a risk factor for affective disorders for certain vulnerable individuals. Stress and depression are linked in part through regulation of the dorsal raphe (DR)-serotonin (5-HT) system by the stress-related neuropeptide, corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF). We used a rat social stress model that shows individual differences in coping strategies to determine whether differences in CRF-5-HT interactions underlie individual differences in the vulnerability to social stress. METHODS: Rats were exposed to the resident-intruder model of social stress for 5 days. In vivo single-unit recordings assessed DR-5-HT neuronal responses to CRF and immunoelectron microscopy assessed CRF1 and CRF2 cellular localization 24 hours after the last stress. RESULTS: Rats responded to social stress passively, assuming defeat with short latencies (48%), or actively, with proactive behaviors and longer defeat latencies (LL, 52%). Whereas CRF (30 ng, intra-DR) inhibited 5-HT neuronal activity of control and SL rats, it activated 5-HT neurons of LL rats, an effect that was CRF2-mediated. Consistent with this, social stress promoted CRF1 internalization together with CRF2 recruitment to the plasma membrane of DR neurons selectively in LL rats. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a proactive coping strategy toward social stress is associated with a redistribution of CRF1 and CRF2 in DR-5-HT neurons that primes the system to be activated by subsequent stress. The lack of this adaptation in passive coping rats may contribute to their depressive-like phenotype. These studies provide a cellular mechanism for individual differences in stress responses and consequences.
BACKGROUND: Social stress is a risk factor for affective disorders for certain vulnerable individuals. Stress and depression are linked in part through regulation of the dorsal raphe (DR)-serotonin (5-HT) system by the stress-related neuropeptide, corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF). We used a rat social stress model that shows individual differences in coping strategies to determine whether differences in CRF-5-HT interactions underlie individual differences in the vulnerability to social stress. METHODS:Rats were exposed to the resident-intruder model of social stress for 5 days. In vivo single-unit recordings assessed DR-5-HT neuronal responses to CRF and immunoelectron microscopy assessed CRF1 and CRF2 cellular localization 24 hours after the last stress. RESULTS:Rats responded to social stress passively, assuming defeat with short latencies (48%), or actively, with proactive behaviors and longer defeat latencies (LL, 52%). Whereas CRF (30 ng, intra-DR) inhibited 5-HT neuronal activity of control and SL rats, it activated 5-HT neurons of LL rats, an effect that was CRF2-mediated. Consistent with this, social stress promoted CRF1 internalization together with CRF2 recruitment to the plasma membrane of DR neurons selectively in LL rats. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a proactive coping strategy toward social stress is associated with a redistribution of CRF1 and CRF2 in DR-5-HT neurons that primes the system to be activated by subsequent stress. The lack of this adaptation in passive coping rats may contribute to their depressive-like phenotype. These studies provide a cellular mechanism for individual differences in stress responses and consequences.
Authors: T L Bale; A Contarino; G W Smith; R Chan; L H Gold; P E Sawchenko; G F Koob; W W Vale; K F Lee Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: T Kishimoto; J Radulovic; M Radulovic; C R Lin; C Schrick; F Hooshmand; O Hermanson; M G Rosenfeld; J Spiess Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: K S Kendler; R C Kessler; E E Walters; C MacLean; M C Neale; A C Heath; L J Eaves Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Erwin H van den Burg; Benjamin Jurek; Inga D Neumann; Julia Winter; Magdalena Meyer; Ilona Berger; Melanie Royer; Marta Bianchi; Kerstin Kuffner; Sebastian Peters; Simone Stang; Dominik Langgartner; Finn Hartmann; Anna K Schmidtner; Stefan O Reber; Oliver J Bosch; Anna Bludau; David A Slattery Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: R Parrish Waters; Marion Rivalan; D A Bangasser; J M Deussing; M Ising; S K Wood; F Holsboer; Cliff H Summers Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Lara S Hwa; Sofia Neira; Melanie M Pina; Dipanwita Pati; Rachel Calloway; Thomas L Kash Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Julie E Finnell; Casey M Moffitt; L Ande Hesser; Evelynn Harrington; Michael N Melson; Christopher S Wood; Susan K Wood Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Emily C Wright; Tiffany V Parks; Jonathon O Alexander; Rajesh Supra; Brian C Trainor Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 3.332