Alexis R Howerton1, Alison V Roland1, Jessica M Fluharty1, Anikò Marshall2, Alon Chen3, Derek Daniels2, Sheryl G Beck4, Tracy L Bale5. 1. Department of Animal Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York. 3. Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. 4. Department of Anesthesia, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Animal Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: tbale@vet.upenn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Women are twice as likely as men to suffer from stress-related affective disorders. Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is an important link between stress and mood, in part through its signaling in the serotonergic dorsal raphe (DR). Development of CRF receptor-1 (CRFr1) antagonists has been a focus of numerous clinical trials but has not yet been proven efficacious. We hypothesized that sex differences in CRFr1 modulation of DR circuits might be key determinants in predicting therapeutic responses and affective disorder vulnerability. METHODS: Male and female mice received DR infusions of the CRFr1 antagonist, NBI 35965, or CRF and were evaluated for stress responsivity. Sex differences in indices of neural activation (cFos) and colocalization of CRFr1 throughout the DR were examined. Whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology assessed sex differences in serotonin neuron membrane characteristics and responsivity to CRF. RESULTS: Males showed robust behavioral and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses to DR infusion of NBI 35965 and CRF, whereas females were minimally responsive. Sex differences were also found for both CRF-induced DR cFos and CRFr1 co-localization throughout the DR. Electrophysiologically, female serotonergic neurons showed blunted membrane excitability and divergent inhibitory postsynaptic current responses to CRF application. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate convincing sex differences in CRFr1 activity in the DR, where blunted female responses to NBI 35965 and CRF suggest unique stress modulation of the DR. These sex differences might underlie affective disorder vulnerability and differential sensitivity to pharmacologic treatments developed to target the CRF system, thereby contributing to a current lack of CRFr1 antagonist efficacy in clinical trials.
BACKGROUND:Women are twice as likely as men to suffer from stress-related affective disorders. Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is an important link between stress and mood, in part through its signaling in the serotonergic dorsal raphe (DR). Development of CRF receptor-1 (CRFr1) antagonists has been a focus of numerous clinical trials but has not yet been proven efficacious. We hypothesized that sex differences in CRFr1 modulation of DR circuits might be key determinants in predicting therapeutic responses and affective disorder vulnerability. METHODS: Male and female mice received DR infusions of the CRFr1 antagonist, NBI 35965, or CRF and were evaluated for stress responsivity. Sex differences in indices of neural activation (cFos) and colocalization of CRFr1 throughout the DR were examined. Whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology assessed sex differences in serotonin neuron membrane characteristics and responsivity to CRF. RESULTS: Males showed robust behavioral and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses to DR infusion of NBI 35965 and CRF, whereas females were minimally responsive. Sex differences were also found for both CRF-induced DR cFos and CRFr1 co-localization throughout the DR. Electrophysiologically, female serotonergic neurons showed blunted membrane excitability and divergent inhibitory postsynaptic current responses to CRF application. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate convincing sex differences in CRFr1 activity in the DR, where blunted female responses to NBI 35965 and CRF suggest unique stress modulation of the DR. These sex differences might underlie affective disorder vulnerability and differential sensitivity to pharmacologic treatments developed to target the CRF system, thereby contributing to a current lack of CRFr1 antagonist efficacy in clinical trials.
Authors: Emily M Jutkiewicz; Susan K Wood; Hani Houshyar; Ling-Wei Hsin; Kenner C Rice; James H Woods Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2005-02-05 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: G W Smith; J M Aubry; F Dellu; A Contarino; L M Bilezikjian; L H Gold; R Chen; Y Marchuk; C Hauser; C A Bentley; P E Sawchenko; G F Koob; W Vale; K F Lee Journal: Neuron Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: S W Sutton; D P Behan; S L Lahrichi; R Kaiser; A Corrigan; P Lowry; E Potter; M H Perrin; J Rivier; W W Vale Journal: Endocrinology Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: R Parrish Waters; Marion Rivalan; D A Bangasser; J M Deussing; M Ising; S K Wood; F Holsboer; Cliff H Summers Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Kelly J Brunst; Maria José Rosa; Calvin Jara; Lianna R Lipton; Alison Lee; Brent A Coull; Rosalind J Wright Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: M R Arnold; P H Williams; J A McArthur; A R Archuleta; C E O'Neill; J E Hassell; D G Smith; R K Bachtell; C A Lowry Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Kimberly R Wiersielis; Brittany Wicks; Hannah Simko; Sarah R Cohen; Sabina Khantsis; Nausheen Baksh; David E Waxler; Debra A Bangasser Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 4.905