| Literature DB >> 23452435 |
Xue-Cai Hao1, Xiu-Shan Yang1, Ping Wan1, Shen Tian1.
Abstract
The development of inhibitor-tolerant ethanologenic yeast is one of the most significant challenges facing bio-ethanol production. Adaptation of Pichia stipitis to inhibitors is one of the most efficient ways for dealing with inhibitor problems. The molecular mechanisms involved in the tolerance and adaptation of P. stipitis are, however, still unclear. In the present study, we developed a yeast strain from P. stipitis Y7 that has improved tolerance against inhibitors. We performed comparative proteomic investigations with sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. These investigations gave insights into the tolerance of yeast strains to biomass conversion inhibitors at the protein level. Many proteins involved in glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway, and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle were found to be differentially expressed due to the presence of furfural. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and metabolite analysis were utilized to provide orthogonal evidence for the results obtained. Our results provide a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the response of P. stipitis to furfural. These findings will benefit the design and development of inhibitor-tolerant yeast.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23452435 PMCID: PMC3621497 DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-34
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Figure 1Cell growth of parental strain Y7 and adapted strain Y7-1 as measured at ODon the defined medium containing 10 Mm (A), 20 mM (B), 30 mM (C) and 40 mM (D) furfural.
Summaries of fermentation results from the parental and the adapted strains of
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethanol yield on substrate (gp gs-1) | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.03 |
| Theoretical yield (%)b | 71.06 ± 0.02 | 78.14 ± 0.07 | 69.74 ± 0.01 | 83.33 ± 0.03 |
| Ethanol productivity (gpL-1 h-1) | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.41 ± 0.04 | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 0.41 ± 0.03 |
| Fermentation time (h) | 60 | 48 | 60 | 48 |
| Maximum ethanol concentration(gpL-1) | 17.76 ± 0.03 | 19.53 ± 0.04 | 16.80 ± 0.05 | 19.87 ± 0.03 |
| Total sugar consumption rate (gl-1 L-1 h-1) | 0.82 ± 0.04 | 1.02 ± 0.05 | 0.79 ± 0.04 | 0.98 ± 0.06 |
a The initial cell density for fermentation was 2.0gL-1.
b Theoretical yield ethanol from glucose is 0.51gpgs-1; theoretical yield (%) calculated as ethanol yield × 100 divided by 0.51.
Biological process analyses of the differentially expressed proteins according to Gene Ontology
| GO:0044262 | cellular carbohydrate metabolic process | 23 | 0.00013 |
| GO:0005996 | monosaccharide metabolic process | 19 | 0.0003 |
| GO:0006066 | alcohol metabolic process | 19 | 0.0003 |
| GO:0006091 | generation of precursor metabolites and energy | 19 | 0.0003 |
| GO:0019318 | hexose metabolic process | 19 | 0.0003 |
| GO:0006006 | glucose metabolic process | 18 | 0.00054 |
| GO:0044282 | small molecule catabolic process | 15 | 0.00064 |
| GO:0006007 | glucose catabolic process | 14 | 0.00116 |
| GO:0016052 | carbohydrate catabolic process | 14 | 0.00116 |
| GO:0019320 | hexose catabolic process | 14 | 0.00116 |
| GO:0044275 | cellular carbohydrate catabolic process | 14 | 0.00116 |
| GO:0046164 | alcohol catabolic process | 14 | 0.00116 |
| GO:0046365 | monosaccharide catabolic process | 14 | 0.00116 |
| GO:0009056 | catabolic process | 21 | 0.00127 |
| GO:0005975 | carbohydrate metabolic process | 25 | 0.00646 |
Figure 2Comparison of transcript levels for selected genes in Y7 and Y7-1. The two strains were cultivated in flasks containing 100 ml of the YPD medium (containing 10 mM of furfural·liter-1) at 30°C and 150 rpm for 4 h. Mean values are presented with error bars representing variations of two standard deviations. The fold change was determined by the 2-ΔΔCt method.
Figure 3Relative expression levels of proteins involved in the central carbon metabolism, including glycolysis, the TCA cycle and the PPP. The ratios of proteins are presented for Y7 and Y7-1 at the 4 h time point (the value in parentheses). Comparative mRNA expressions of genes at 4 h, 6 h and 10 h time point are presented. Ratios between Y7 and Y7-1 levels are shown (column configuration).