| Literature DB >> 23451766 |
Vanessa Gonzalez-Covarrubias1, Marian Beekman, Hae-Won Uh, Adrie Dane, Jorne Troost, Iryna Paliukhovich, Frans M van der Kloet, Jeanine Houwing-Duistermaat, Rob J Vreeken, Thomas Hankemeier, Eline P Slagboom.
Abstract
Middle-aged offspring of nonagenarians, as compared to their spouses (controls), show a favorable lipid metabolism marked by larger LDL particle size in men and lower total triglyceride levels in women. To investigate which specific lipids associate with familial longevity, we explore the plasma lipidome by measuring 128 lipid species using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry in 1526 offspring of nonagenarians (59 years ± 6.6) and 675 (59 years ± 7.4) controls from the Leiden Longevity Study. In men, no significant differences were observed between offspring and controls. In women, however, 19 lipid species associated with familial longevity. Female offspring showed higher levels of ether phosphocholine (PC) and sphingomyelin (SM) species (3.5-8.7%) and lower levels of phosphoethanolamine PE (38:6) and long-chain triglycerides (TG) (9.4-12.4%). The association with familial longevity of two ether PC and four SM species was independent of total triglyceride levels. In addition, the longevity-associated lipid profile was characterized by a higher ratio of monounsaturated (MUFA) over polyunsaturated (PUFA) lipid species, suggesting that female offspring have a plasma lipidome less prone to oxidative stress. Ether PC and SM species were identified as novel longevity markers in females, independent of total triglycerides levels. Several longevity-associated lipids correlated with a lower risk of hypertension and diabetes in the Leiden Longevity Study cohort. This sex-specific lipid signature marks familial longevity and may suggest a plasma lipidome with a better antioxidant capacity, lower lipid peroxidation and inflammatory precursors, and an efficient beta-oxidation function.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23451766 PMCID: PMC3709127 DOI: 10.1111/acel.12064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging Cell ISSN: 1474-9718 Impact factor: 9.304
Demographics of the study population
| Controls (675) | Offspring (1526) | |
|---|---|---|
| Males (285), Females (390) | Males (714), Females (812) | |
| Age (years) | 58.8 ± 7.4 (30.2–79.2) | 59.4 ± 6.6 (33.6–80.3) |
| BMI (kg m−2) | 25.3 ± 3.6 (25.3–25.9) | 25.8 ± 3.6 (25.2–25.5) |
| Total TG (m | 1.94 ± 1.37 (1.81–2.03) | 1.76 ± 1.05 (1.69–1.80) |
| HDL-C (m | 1.43 ± 0.465 (1.40–1.47) | 1.45 ± 0.448 (1.43–1.48) |
| LDL-C (m | 3.36 ± 0.938 (3.29–3.43) | 3.34 ± 0.987 (3.29–3.39) |
| HDL particle size (nm) | 9.01 ± 0.509 (8.99–9.10) | 9.05 ± 0.507 (9.03–9.08) |
| LDL particle size (nm) | 21.1 ± 0.838 (21.09–21.21) | 21.3 ± 0.826 (21.2–21.3) |
| TG/HDLC ratio | 1.66 ± 1.54 (1.54–1.78) | 1.45 ± 1.27 (1.39–1.52) |
| Diabetes type 2 (%) | 47 (8.2) | 56 (4.3) |
| Hypertension (%) | 166 (28.7) | 288 (22.3) |
| MUFA-to-PUFA ratio | 0.881 ± 0.37 (0.851–0.911) | 0.928 ± 0.380 (0.907–0.948) |
Data are reported as mean values ± SD followed by range values in parentheses.
Values are number of cases followed by percentage in parenthesis.
Values are adjusted means from the regression model ± SD followed by range values between parenthesis.
Fig. 1Differences in lipid species between offspring of nonagenarians and controls. Left, differences in women; Right, differences in men. Statistical significance was observed in females only (*P < 0.005; **P < 0.001; ***P < 0.0005). X-axis depicts the effect size of levels of ln-transformed lipid species ± robust standard errors. Positive values indicate lipid levels higher in offspring. Negative values indicate lipid levels lower in offspring compared with controls.
Effect of age (men and women) and sex in lipid species that associated with familial longevity
| Lipid | Adjusted mean | Effect of age | Effect of sex | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta ± SE | Beta ± SE | ||||
| PC (O-34:3) | 0.736 | −0.067 ± 0.010 | 1.0 × 10−11 | −0.134 ± 0.012 | <10−20 |
| PC (O-34:1) | 0.41 | −0.021 ± 0.008 | 7.0 × 10−3 | −0.121 ± 0.010 | <10−20 |
| PC (O-36:3) | 0.176 | −0.041 ± 0.011 | 1.3 × 10−4 | −0.096 ± 0.013 | 1.3 × 10−12 |
| PC (O-36:2) | 0.122 | −0.029 ± 0.011 | 1.1 × 10−2 | −0.098 ± 0.014 | 6.5 × 10−12 |
| PE (38:6) | 0.819 | 0.046 ± 0.019 | 1.3 × 10−2 | −0.221 ± 0.026 | 4.3 × 10−17 |
| SM (d18:1/14:0) | 0.362 | 0.039 ± 0.009 | 2.2 × 10−5 | −0.154 ± 0.011 | <10−20 |
| SM (d18:1/15:0) | 0.229 | 0.050 ± 0.009 | 5.0 × 10−8 | −0.177 ± 0.011 | <10−20 |
| SM (d18:1/16:0) | 6.624 | 0.012 ± 0.006 | 3.9 × 10−2 | −0.969 ± 0.008 | <10−20 |
| SM (d18:1/17:0) | 0.085 | 0.056 ± 0.010 | 1.0 × 10−8 | −0.190 ± 0.012 | <10−20 |
| SM (d18:1/18:2) | 0.023 | 0.003 ± 0.010 | 7.8 × 10−1 | −0.274 ± 0.013 | <10−20 |
| SM (d18:1/21:0) | 0.282 | 0.021 ± 0.011 | 3.3 × 10−2 | −0.210 ± 0.013 | <10−20 |
| SM (d18:1/23:1) | 0.501 | 0.033 ± 0.008 | 8.1 × 10−5 | −0.251 ± 0.010 | <10−20 |
| SM (d18:1/23:0) | 0.74 | 0.002 ± 0.008 | 7.5 × 10−1 | −0.144 ± 0.010 | <10−20 |
| TG (52:1) | 4.065 | 0.073 ± 0.018 | 7.2 × 10−5 | 0.225 ± 0.026 | 2.4 × 10−17 |
| TG (54:7) | 0.376 | 0.063 ± 0.021 | 3.0 × 10−3 | 0.144 ± 0.028 | 4.7 × 10−7 |
| TG (54:6) | 1.38 | 0.043 ± 0.023 | 5.7 × 10−2 | 0.222 ± 0.031 | 8.6 × 10−13 |
| TG (56:7) | 1.021 | 0.052 ± 0.020 | 1.0 × 10−2 | 0.192 ± 0.028 | 1.8 × 10−11 |
| TG (56:6) | 1.116 | 0.041 ± 0.018 | 2.3 × 10−2 | 0.157 ± 0.024 | 4.9 × 10−11 |
| TG (57:2) | 1.216 | 0.059 ± 0.018 | 1.0 × 10−3 | 0.219 ± 0.025 | 1.7 × 10−18 |
Nominal P-value.
Back-transformed adjusted means of relative lipid levels.
Beta, effect size of age in 10 years and robust standard error.
Beta, effect size of sex and robust standard error; negative values indicate lipid levels lower in men, positive values indicate lipid levels higher in men.
Effect of age after 55 years on levels of lipid species that associated with familial longevity
| Controls | Offspring | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta ± SE | Beta ± SE | |||
| PC (O-34:3) | 0.037 ± 0.322 | 0.909 | 0.034 ± 0.369 | 0.927 |
| PC (O-34:1) | −0.384 ± 0.303 | 0.206 | −0.124 ± 0.236 | 0.600 |
| PC (O-36:3) | 0.015 ± 0.372 | 0.969 | −0.352 ± 0.372 | 0.345 |
| PC (O-36:2) | 0.029 ± 0.386 | 0.940 | −0.718 ± 0.428 | 0.094 |
| PE (38:6) | −0.900 ± 0.680 | 0.186 | 0.602 ± 0.652 | 0.356 |
| SM (d18:1/14:0) | −0.051 ± 0.278 | 0.854 | 0.524 ± 0.288 | 0.069 |
| SM (d18:1/15:0) | −0.368 ± 0.296 | 0.215 | 0.408 ± 0.274 | 0.136 |
| SM (d18:1/16:0) | −0.049 ± 0.221 | 0.825 | 0.344 ± 0.185 | 0.064 |
| SM (d18:1/17:0) | −0.118 ± 0.329 | 0.719 | −0.002 ± 0.448 | 0.996 |
| SM (d18:1/18:2) | −0.589 ± 0.404 | 0.146 | 0.093 ± 0.341 | 0.786 |
| SM (d18:1/21:0) | −0.058 ± 0.319 | 0.855 | 0.418 ± 0.315 | 0.186 |
| SM (d18:1/23:1) | −0.169 ± 0.283 | 0.550 | 0.682 ± 0.226 | 0.003 |
| SM (d18:1/23:0) | 0.197 ± 0.255 | 0.440 | 0.630 ± 0.238 | 0.008 |
| TG (52:1) | −0.050 ± 0.691 | 0.942 | 1.40 ± 0.632 | 0.027 |
| TG (54:7) | −0.672 ± 0.786 | 0.393 | 1.24 ± 0.637 | 0.052 |
| TG (54:6) | −0.360 ± 0.793 | 0.650 | 1.86 ± 0.690 | 0.005 |
| TG (56:7) | −0.686 ± 0.727 | 0.346 | 1.10 ± 0.656 | 0.094 |
| TG (56:6) | −0.699 ± 0.609 | 0.252 | 1.18 ± 0.537 | 0.028 |
| TG (57:2) | −0.779 ± 0.633 | 0.219 | 0.828 ± 0.544 | 0.129 |
Nominal P-value.
Beta, effect size of age after 55 years and robust standard error; negative values indicate lipid levels decrease and positive values indicate lipid levels increase after 55 years.
Fig. 2MUFA-to-PUFA ratio differences in offspring of nonagenarians and controls. Adjusted mean values of MUFA-to-PUFA ratios and 95% confidence intervals; female differences P = 2.6 × 10−4; male differences P > 0.05.
Fig. 3Correlation heatmap of longevity-associated lipids and clinical parameters in female offspring.