INTRODUCTION: The Integrative Medicine in Residency (IMR) program, a 200-hour Internet-based, collaborative educational initiative was implemented in 8 family medicine residency programs and has shown a potential to serve as a national model for incorporating training in integrative/complementary/alternative medicine in graduate medical education. INTERVENTION: The curriculum content was designed based on a needs assessment and a set of competencies for graduate medical education developed following the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education outcome project guidelines. The content was delivered through distributed online learning and included onsite activities. A modular format allowed for a flexible implementation in different residency settings. EVALUATION: TO ASSESS THE FEASIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTING THE CURRICULUM, A MULTIMODAL EVALUATION WAS UTILIZED, INCLUDING: (1) residents' evaluation of the curriculum; (2) residents' competencies evaluation through medical knowledge testing, self-assessment, direct observations, and reflections; and (3) residents' wellness and well-being through behavioral assessments. RESULTS: The class of 2011 (n = 61) had a high rate of curriculum completion in the first and second year (98.7% and 84.2%) and course evaluations on meeting objectives, clinical utility, and functioning of the technology were highly rated. There was a statistically significant improvement in medical knowledge test scores for questions aligned with content for both the PGY-1 and PGY-2 courses. CONCLUSIONS: The IMR program is an advance in the national effort to make training in integrative medicine available to physicians on a broad scale and is a success in terms of online education. Evaluation suggests that this program is feasible for implementation and acceptable to residents despite the many pressures of residency.
INTRODUCTION: The Integrative Medicine in Residency (IMR) program, a 200-hour Internet-based, collaborative educational initiative was implemented in 8 family medicine residency programs and has shown a potential to serve as a national model for incorporating training in integrative/complementary/alternative medicine in graduate medical education. INTERVENTION: The curriculum content was designed based on a needs assessment and a set of competencies for graduate medical education developed following the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education outcome project guidelines. The content was delivered through distributed online learning and included onsite activities. A modular format allowed for a flexible implementation in different residency settings. EVALUATION: TO ASSESS THE FEASIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTING THE CURRICULUM, A MULTIMODAL EVALUATION WAS UTILIZED, INCLUDING: (1) residents' evaluation of the curriculum; (2) residents' competencies evaluation through medical knowledge testing, self-assessment, direct observations, and reflections; and (3) residents' wellness and well-being through behavioral assessments. RESULTS: The class of 2011 (n = 61) had a high rate of curriculum completion in the first and second year (98.7% and 84.2%) and course evaluations on meeting objectives, clinical utility, and functioning of the technology were highly rated. There was a statistically significant improvement in medical knowledge test scores for questions aligned with content for both the PGY-1 and PGY-2 courses. CONCLUSIONS: The IMR program is an advance in the national effort to make training in integrative medicine available to physicians on a broad scale and is a success in terms of online education. Evaluation suggests that this program is feasible for implementation and acceptable to residents despite the many pressures of residency.
Authors: Victoria Maizes; Howard Silverman; Patricia Lebensohn; Mary Koithan; Benjamin Kligler; David Rakel; Craig Schneider; Wendy Kohatsu; Meg Hayes; Andrew Weil Journal: Acad Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Rita Benn; Victoria Maizes; Mary Guerrera; Victor Sierpina; Paula Cook; Patricia Lebensohn Journal: Fam Med Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Benjamin Kligler; Mary Koithan; Victoria Maizes; Meg Hayes; Craig Schneider; Patricia Lebensohn; Susan Hadley Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2007-04-18 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Linda Van Horn; Carine M Lenders; Charlotte A Pratt; Bettina Beech; Patricia A Carney; William Dietz; Rose DiMaria-Ghalili; Timothy Harlan; Robert Hash; Martin Kohlmeier; Kathryn Kolasa; Nancy F Krebs; Robert F Kushner; Mary Lieh-Lai; Janet Lindsley; Susan Meacham; Holly Nicastro; Caryl Nowson; Carole Palmer; Miguel Paniagua; Edward Philips; Sumantra Ray; Suzanne Rose; Marcel Salive; Marsha Schofield; Kathryn Thompson; Jennifer L Trilk; Gwen Twillman; Jeffrey D White; Giovanna Zappalà; Ashley Vargas; Christopher Lynch Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Benjamin Kligler; Audrey J Brooks; Victoria Maizes; Elizabeth Goldblatt; Maryanna Klatt; Mary S Koithan; Mary Jo Kreitzer; Jeannie K Lee; Ana Marie Lopez; Hilary McClafferty; Robert Rhode; Irene Sandvold; Robert Saper; Douglas Taren; Eden Wells; Patricia Lebensohn Journal: Glob Adv Health Med Date: 2015-09-01
Authors: Anish Patnaik; Justin Tran; John W McWhorter; Helen Burks; Alexandra Ngo; Tu Dan Nguyen; Avni Mody; Laura Moore; Deanna M Hoelscher; Amber Dyer; Leah Sarris; Timothy Harlan; C Mark Chassay; Dominique Monlezun Journal: Med Sci Educ Date: 2020-05-20