PURPOSE: Unstable paediatric diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures requiring fixation have traditionally been treated with rigid internal fixation with plate and screws. Intramedullary stabilisation has grown in popularity over the last 25 years but may be associated with rotational deformity and subsequent loss of pronosupination. This systematic review aims to establish which treatment method provides better functional outcome. METHODS: A systematic review of the published literature was performed, searching Medline, Embase, Pubmed and the Cochrane Library for English-language studies comparing intramedullary nailing with plate and screws in patients less than 18 years old with both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures. RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. They were all retrospective comparative studies (level III or IV). One was age- and sex-matched. Three looked specifically at older children. No study reported a significant difference in functional outcome with either treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The currently available literature shows no difference in functional outcome between intramedullary nailing and plate and screw fixation, even in older children with less remodelling potential. Intramedullary nailing may therefore be the treatment of choice for simple fracture patterns due to shorter operative time, better cosmesis and ease of removal. Plating may still have a role in more complex injuries.
PURPOSE: Unstable paediatric diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures requiring fixation have traditionally been treated with rigid internal fixation with plate and screws. Intramedullary stabilisation has grown in popularity over the last 25 years but may be associated with rotational deformity and subsequent loss of pronosupination. This systematic review aims to establish which treatment method provides better functional outcome. METHODS: A systematic review of the published literature was performed, searching Medline, Embase, Pubmed and the Cochrane Library for English-language studies comparing intramedullary nailing with plate and screws in patients less than 18 years old with both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures. RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. They were all retrospective comparative studies (level III or IV). One was age- and sex-matched. Three looked specifically at older children. No study reported a significant difference in functional outcome with either treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The currently available literature shows no difference in functional outcome between intramedullary nailing and plate and screw fixation, even in older children with less remodelling potential. Intramedullary nailing may therefore be the treatment of choice for simple fracture patterns due to shorter operative time, better cosmesis and ease of removal. Plating may still have a role in more complex injuries.