BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) deficiency and cognitive impairment are both prevalent in hemodialysis patients in the United States. This study tested the hypothesis that 25(OH)D deficiency may be associated with cognitive impairment because of its vasculoprotective, neuroprotective, and immune-modulatory properties. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This cross-sectional analysis involved 255 patients enrolled in the Dialysis and Cognition Study between 2004 and 2012. In linear regression models, 25(OH)D was the exposure variable; it was used first as a continuous variable and then stratified as deficient (<12 ng/ml), insufficient (12 to <20 ng/ml), and sufficient (≥20 ng/ml). Principal component analysis was used to obtain the memory and the executive function domains from the individual neurocognitive tests. Scores on individual tests as well as on the memory and executive function domains were the outcome variables. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex, race, education, and other potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Mean serum 25(OH)D ± SD was 17.2±7.4 ng/ml, with 14%, 55%, and 31% of patients in the deficient, insufficient, and sufficient groups, respectively. Patients in the deficient group were more likely to be women, African American, and diabetic and to have longer dialysis vintage. Higher 25(OH)D levels were independently associated with better performance on several tests of executive function (mean difference on component executive score, 0.16 [95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.28; P=0.01] for each SD higher 25[OH]D). No association was seen with tests assessing memory. CONCLUSIONS: 25(OH)D deficiency in hemodialysis patients is associated with worse cognitive function, particularly in domains that assess executive function.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) deficiency and cognitive impairment are both prevalent in hemodialysis patients in the United States. This study tested the hypothesis that 25(OH)D deficiency may be associated with cognitive impairment because of its vasculoprotective, neuroprotective, and immune-modulatory properties. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This cross-sectional analysis involved 255 patients enrolled in the Dialysis and Cognition Study between 2004 and 2012. In linear regression models, 25(OH)D was the exposure variable; it was used first as a continuous variable and then stratified as deficient (<12 ng/ml), insufficient (12 to <20 ng/ml), and sufficient (≥20 ng/ml). Principal component analysis was used to obtain the memory and the executive function domains from the individual neurocognitive tests. Scores on individual tests as well as on the memory and executive function domains were the outcome variables. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex, race, education, and other potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Mean serum 25(OH)D ± SD was 17.2±7.4 ng/ml, with 14%, 55%, and 31% of patients in the deficient, insufficient, and sufficient groups, respectively. Patients in the deficient group were more likely to be women, African American, and diabetic and to have longer dialysis vintage. Higher 25(OH)D levels were independently associated with better performance on several tests of executive function (mean difference on component executive score, 0.16 [95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.28; P=0.01] for each SD higher 25[OH]D). No association was seen with tests assessing memory. CONCLUSIONS: 25(OH)D deficiency in hemodialysis patients is associated with worse cognitive function, particularly in domains that assess executive function.
Authors: Arema A Pereira; Daniel E Weiner; Tammy Scott; Priya Chandra; Robyn Bluestein; John Griffith; Mark J Sarnak Journal: Hemodial Int Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 1.812
Authors: John McGrath; Robert Scragg; David Chant; Darryl Eyles; Thomas Burne; Darja Obradovic Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2007-09-24 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: C Oudshoorn; F U S Mattace-Raso; N van der Velde; E M Colin; T J M van der Cammen Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2008-05-26 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: M Wolf; A Shah; O Gutierrez; E Ankers; M Monroy; H Tamez; D Steele; Y Chang; C A Camargo; M Tonelli; R Thadhani Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2007-08-08 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Ron Wald; Mark J Sarnak; Hocine Tighiouart; Alfred K Cheung; Andrew S Levey; Garabed Eknoyan; Dana C Miskulin Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2008-07-26 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Na Ri Kang; Yo Han Ahn; Eujin Park; Keum Hwa Lee; Hee Sun Baek; Seong Heon Kim; Heeyeon Cho; Min Hyun Cho; Jae Il Shin; Joo Hoon Lee; Hae Il Cheong; Hee Gyung Kang; Young Seo Park; Il Soo Ha; Duk Soo Moon; Kyoung Hee Han Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Anna J Jovanovich; Michel Chonchol; Christopher B Brady; James D Kaufman; Jessica Kendrick; Alfred K Cheung; Kristen L Jablonski Journal: Clin Nephrol Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 0.975