Thomas Hiemstra1,2, Kenneth Lim3, Ravi Thadhani4, JoAnn E Manson5. 1. Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK. 2. School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 3. Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 4. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. 5. Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: A large body of experimental and observational data has implicated vitamin D deficiency in the development of cardiovascular disease. However, evidence to support routine vitamin D supplementation to prevent or treat cardiovascular disease is lacking. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive literature review was performed using Pubmed and other literature search engines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Mounting epidemiological evidence and data from Mendelian randomization studies support a link between vitamin D deficiency and adverse cardiovascular health outcomes, but randomized trial evidence to support vitamin D supplementation is sparse. Current public health guidelines restrict vitamin D intake recommendations to the maintenance of bone health and prevention of fractures. Two recently published large trials (VITAL and ViDA) that assessed the role of moderate-to-high dose vitamin D supplementation as primary prevention for cardiovascular outcomes in the general population had null results, and previous randomized trials have also been generally negative. These findings from general population cohorts that are largely replete in vitamin D may not be applicable to chronic kidney disease (CKD) populations, in which the use of active (1α-hydroxylated) vitamin D compounds is prevalent, or to other high-risk populations. Additionally, recent trials in the CKD population, and trials using vitamin D analogues have been limited. CONCLUSIONS: Current randomized trials of vitamin D supplementation do not support benefits for cardiovascular health, but the evidence remains inconclusive. Additional randomized trials assessing larger numbers of participants with low baseline vitamin D levels, having longer follow-up periods, and testing higher vitamin D dosages, are needed to guide clinical practice.
CONTEXT: A large body of experimental and observational data has implicated vitamin Ddeficiency in the development of cardiovascular disease. However, evidence to support routine vitamin D supplementation to prevent or treat cardiovascular disease is lacking. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive literature review was performed using Pubmed and other literature search engines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Mounting epidemiological evidence and data from Mendelian randomization studies support a link between vitamin Ddeficiency and adverse cardiovascular health outcomes, but randomized trial evidence to support vitamin D supplementation is sparse. Current public health guidelines restrict vitamin D intake recommendations to the maintenance of bone health and prevention of fractures. Two recently published large trials (VITAL and ViDA) that assessed the role of moderate-to-high dose vitamin D supplementation as primary prevention for cardiovascular outcomes in the general population had null results, and previous randomized trials have also been generally negative. These findings from general population cohorts that are largely replete in vitamin D may not be applicable to chronic kidney disease (CKD) populations, in which the use of active (1α-hydroxylated) vitamin D compounds is prevalent, or to other high-risk populations. Additionally, recent trials in the CKD population, and trials using vitamin D analogues have been limited. CONCLUSIONS: Current randomized trials of vitamin D supplementation do not support benefits for cardiovascular health, but the evidence remains inconclusive. Additional randomized trials assessing larger numbers of participants with low baseline vitamin D levels, having longer follow-up periods, and testing higher vitamin D dosages, are needed to guide clinical practice.
Authors: Akira Sekikawa; Katsuyuki Miura; Sunghee Lee; Akira Fujiyoshi; Daniel Edmundowicz; Takashi Kadowaki; Rhobert W Evans; Sayaka Kadowaki; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Tomonori Okamura; Marnie Bertolet; Kamal H Masaki; Yasuyuki Nakamura; Emma J M Barinas-Mitchell; Bradley J Willcox; Aya Kadota; Todd B Seto; Hiroshi Maegawa; Lewis H Kuller; Hirotsugu Ueshima Journal: Heart Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Stefan Pilz; Nicolas Verheyen; Martin R Grübler; Andreas Tomaschitz; Winfried März Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Jun H Choi; Qingen Ke; Soochan Bae; Ji Yoo Lee; Yu Jin Kim; Ui Kyoung Kim; Cynthia Arbeeny; Ravi Thadhani; Peter M Kang Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Dalton Bertolim Précoma; Gláucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira; Antonio Felipe Simão; Oscar Pereira Dutra; Otávio Rizzi Coelho; Maria Cristina de Oliveira Izar; Rui Manuel Dos Santos Póvoa; Isabela de Carlos Back Giuliano; Aristóteles Comte de Alencar Filho; Carlos Alberto Machado; Carlos Scherr; Francisco Antonio Helfenstein Fonseca; Raul Dias Dos Santos Filho; Tales de Carvalho; Álvaro Avezum; Roberto Esporcatte; Bruno Ramos Nascimento; David de Pádua Brasil; Gabriel Porto Soares; Paolo Blanco Villela; Roberto Muniz Ferreira; Wolney de Andrade Martins; Andrei C Sposito; Bruno Halpern; José Francisco Kerr Saraiva; Luiz Sergio Fernandes Carvalho; Marcos Antônio Tambascia; Otávio Rizzi Coelho-Filho; Adriana Bertolami; Harry Correa Filho; Hermes Toros Xavier; José Rocha Faria-Neto; Marcelo Chiara Bertolami; Viviane Zorzanelli Rocha Giraldez; Andrea Araújo Brandão; Audes Diógenes de Magalhães Feitosa; Celso Amodeo; Dilma do Socorro Moraes de Souza; Eduardo Costa Duarte Barbosa; Marcus Vinícius Bolívar Malachias; Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso de Souza; Fernando Augusto Alves da Costa; Ivan Romero Rivera; Lucia Campos Pellanda; Maria Alayde Mendonça da Silva; Aloyzio Cechella Achutti; André Ribeiro Langowiski; Carla Janice Baister Lantieri; Jaqueline Ribeiro Scholz; Silvia Maria Cury Ismael; José Carlos Aidar Ayoub; Luiz César Nazário Scala; Mario Fritsch Neves; Paulo Cesar Brandão Veiga Jardim; Sandra Cristina Pereira Costa Fuchs; Thiago de Souza Veiga Jardim; Emilio Hideyuki Moriguchi; Jamil Cherem Schneider; Marcelo Heitor Vieira Assad; Sergio Emanuel Kaiser; Ana Maria Lottenberg; Carlos Daniel Magnoni; Marcio Hiroshi Miname; Roberta Soares Lara; Artur Haddad Herdy; Cláudio Gil Soares de Araújo; Mauricio Milani; Miguel Morita Fernandes da Silva; Ricardo Stein; Fernando Antonio Lucchese; Fernando Nobre; Hermilo Borba Griz; Lucélia Batista Neves Cunha Magalhães; Mario Henrique Elesbão de Borba; Mauro Ricardo Nunes Pontes; Ricardo Mourilhe-Rocha Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Thomas F Hiemstra; Jane C Smith; Kenneth Lim; Dihua Xu; Shreya Kulkarni; J Andrew Bradley; Kaido Paapstel; Inez Schoenmakers; John R Bradley; Laurie Tomlinson; Carmel M McEniery; Ian B Wilkinson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hyun Ah Kim; Andrea Perrelli; Alberto Ragni; Francesca Retta; T Michael De Silva; Christopher G Sobey; Saverio Francesco Retta Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) Date: 2020-04-17
Authors: Kenneth Lim; Guerman Molostvov; Maria Lubczanska; Simon Fletcher; Rosemary Bland; Thomas F Hiemstra; Daniel Zehnder Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 3.240