Literature DB >> 23448902

Artemis is required to improve the accuracy of repair of double-strand breaks with 5'-blocked termini generated from non-DSB-clustered lesions.

Svitlana Malyarchuk1, Reneau Castore, Runhua Shi, Lynn Harrison.   

Abstract

Clustered DNA lesions are defined as ≥2 damage events within 20 bp. Oxidised bases, abasic (AP) sites, single-strand breaks and double-strand breaks (DSBs) exist in radiation-induced clusters, and these lesions are more difficult to repair and can be more mutagenic than single lesions. Understanding clustered lesion repair is therefore important for the design of complementary treatments to enhance radiotherapy. Non-DSB-clustered lesions consisting of opposing AP sites can be converted to DSBs by base excision repair, and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) plays a role in repairing these DSBs. Artemis is an endonuclease that removes blocking groups from DSB termini during NHEJ. Hence, we hypothesised that Artemis plays a role in the processing of DSBs or complex DSBs generated from non-DSB-clustered lesions. We examined the repair of clusters containing two or three lesions in wild-type (WT) or Artemis-deficient (ART(-/-)) mouse fibroblasts using a reporter plasmid. Each cluster contained two opposing tetrahydrofurans (an AP site analogue), which AP endonuclease can convert to a DSB with blocked 5' termini. Loss of Artemis did not decrease plasmid survival, but did result in more mutagenic repair with plasmids containing larger deletions. This increase in deletions did not occur with ClaI-linearised plasmid. Since Mre11 has been implicated in deletional NHEJ, we used small interfering RNA to reduce Mre11 in WT and ART(-/-) cells, but decreasing Mre11 did not change the size of deletions in the repair products. This work implicates Artemis in limiting the deletions introduced during repair of 5'-blocked termini DSBs generated from non-DSB-clustered lesions. Decreasing repair accuracy without decreasing repair capacity could result in mutated cells surviving irradiation. Inhibiting Artemis in normal cells could promote carcinogenesis, while in tumour cells enhanced mutagenic repair following irradiation could promote tumour recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23448902      PMCID: PMC3630522          DOI: 10.1093/mutage/get009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  54 in total

1.  DNA repair of clustered uracils in HeLa cells.

Authors:  Svitlana Malyarchuk; Lynn Harrison
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  A review of dsb induction data for varying quality radiations.

Authors:  K M Prise; G Ahnström; M Belli; J Carlsson; D Frankenberg; J Kiefer; M Löbrich; B D Michael; J Nygren; G Simone; B Stenerlöw
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Radiation-induced DNA damage and its repair.

Authors:  R Téoule
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1987-04

Review 4.  DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability.

Authors:  J F Ward
Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol       Date:  1988

5.  The formation, identification, and significance of DNA-protein cross-links in mammalian cells.

Authors:  N L Oleinick; S M Chiu; N Ramakrishnan; L Y Xue
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1987-06

Review 6.  Radiation mutagenesis: the initial DNA lesions responsible.

Authors:  J F Ward
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  gamma Ray induced deoxyribonucleic acid strand breaks. 3' Glycolate termini.

Authors:  W D Henner; L O Rodriguez; S M Hecht; W A Haseltine
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1983-01-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Critical target and dose and dose-rate responses for the induction of chromosomal instability by ionizing radiation.

Authors:  C L Limoli; J J Corcoran; J R Milligan; J F Ward; W F Morgan
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  A pathway of double-strand break rejoining dependent upon ATM, Artemis, and proteins locating to gamma-H2AX foci.

Authors:  Enriqueta Riballo; Martin Kühne; Nicole Rief; Aidan Doherty; Graeme C M Smith; María-José Recio; Caroline Reis; Kirsten Dahm; Andreas Fricke; Andrea Krempler; Antony R Parker; Stephen P Jackson; Andrew Gennery; Penny A Jeggo; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  APE1-dependent repair of DNA single-strand breaks containing 3'-end 8-oxoguanine.

Authors:  Jason L Parsons; Irina I Dianova; Grigory L Dianov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Silencing Artemis Enhances Colorectal Cancer Cell Sensitivity to DNA-Damaging Agents.

Authors:  Hai Liu; Xuanxuan Wang; Aihua Huang; Huaping Gao; Yikan Sun; Tingting Jiang; Liming Shi; Xianjie Wu; Qinghua Dong; Xiaonan Sun
Journal:  Oncol Res       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.574

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.