Literature DB >> 23445634

Substrate stiffness influences the outcome of antitumor drug screening in vitro.

Jiantao Feng1, Yong Tang, Yonggang Xu, Quanmei Sun, Fulong Liao, Dong Han.   

Abstract

Substrate stiffness has been proven to play a critical role in vitro tumor proliferation; however, pharmacological studies on antitumor drug screening are still routinely carried out in regular plastic culture plates. In the article, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates with different stiffness (mimicking articular cartilage, collagenous bone and mammary tumor respectively) and plastic substrate were employed to establish the mechanical microenvironment for the in vitro drug screening platform. We studied the influences of stiffness on the responses of MCF-7 cells to typical antitumor drugs, cisplatin and taxol. Results showed that for both the treatment IC50 value to MCF-7 cells decreased significantly (p < 0.01) on the rigid substrate, indicating that MCF-7 cells on soft substrate have a resistance to cytotoxicity of antitumor drugs. The sensitivity of MCF-7 cells on rigid substrate to drug cytotoxicity was attributed to the increased cell cycle progression, implying that agents proven to be effective in vitro by conventional screening approach might be inefficient in a soft microenvironment in vivo. We conclude that stiffness of the substrates, as a critical mechanical factor, should be concerned for screening antitumor agents in vitro. As an extrapolation, the extensively used drug screening system needs to be revalued and redesigned.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stiffness; drug screening system; microenvironment; pharmacology; tumor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23445634     DOI: 10.3233/CH-131696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc        ISSN: 1386-0291            Impact factor:   2.375


  8 in total

1.  Translating Mechanobiology to the Clinic: a panel discussion from the 2018 CMBE Conference.

Authors:  Alisa Morss Clyne; Michele Marcolongo; Eric M Darling; Nadeen O Chahine
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.321

2.  Simple polyacrylamide-based multiwell stiffness assay for the study of stiffness-dependent cell responses.

Authors:  Sana Syed; Amin Karadaghy; Silviya Zustiak
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Mechanical phenotype of cancer cells: cell softening and loss of stiffness sensing.

Authors:  Hsi-Hui Lin; Hsiu-Kuan Lin; I-Hsuan Lin; Yu-Wei Chiou; Horn-Wei Chen; Ching-Yi Liu; Hans I-Chen Harn; Wen-Tai Chiu; Yang-Kao Wang; Meng-Ru Shen; Ming-Jer Tang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-08-28

4.  A portable pen-sized instrumentation to measure stiffness of soft tissues in vivo.

Authors:  Zhengwei Li; Alireza Tofangchi; Robert A Stavins; Bashar Emon; Ronald D McKinney; Paul J Grippo; M Taher A Saif
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Exploration of the Effects of Substrate Stiffness on Biological Responses of Neural Cells and Their Mechanisms.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Yan Tan; Jiantao Feng; Chang Huang; Biyuan Liu; Zhu Fan; Bing Xu; Tao Lu
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-11-29

Review 6.  The emerging role of mechanical and topographical factors in the development and treatment of nervous system disorders: dark and light sides of the force.

Authors:  Natalia Bryniarska-Kubiak; Andrzej Kubiak; Małgorzata Lekka; Agnieszka Basta-Kaim
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.024

Review 7.  Tumor and the microenvironment: a chance to reframe the paradigm of carcinogenesis?

Authors:  Mariano Bizzarri; Alessandra Cucina
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Kinetic behaviour of the cells touching substrate: the interfacial stiffness guides cell spreading.

Authors:  Jianjun Li; Dong Han; Ya-Pu Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.