Literature DB >> 23445085

Addressing geographic variability in the comparative toxicity potential of copper and nickel in soils.

Mikołaj Owsianiak1, Ralph K Rosenbaum, Mark A J Huijbregts, Michael Z Hauschild.   

Abstract

Comparative toxicity potentials (CTP), in life cycle impact assessment also known as characterization factors (CF), of copper (Cu) and nickel (Ni) were calculated for a global set of 760 soils. An accessibility factor (ACF) that takes into account the role of the reactive, solid-phase metal pool in the soil was introduced into the definition of CTP. Geographic differences in fate, accessibility, bioavailability, and terrestrial toxicity were assessed by combining the USEtox characterization model, empirical regression models, and terrestrial biotic ligand models. The median CTPs for Cu and Ni with 95% geographic variability intervals are 1.4 × 10(3) (1.7 × 10(2) to 2.0 × 10(4)) and 1.7 × 10(3) (2.1 × 10(2) to 1.1 × 10(4)) m(3)/kg · day, respectively. The geographic variability of 3.5 orders of magnitude in the CTP of Cu is mainly associated with the variability in soil organic carbon and pH. They largely influence the fate and bioavailability of Cu in soils. In contrast, the geographic variability of 3 orders of magnitude in the CTP of Ni can mainly be explained by differences in pore water concentration of magnesium (Mg(2+)). Mg(2+) competes with Ni(2+) for binding to biotic ligands, influencing the toxicity. Our findings stress the importance of dealing with geographic variability in the calculation of CTPs for terrestrial ecotoxicity of metals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23445085     DOI: 10.1021/es3037324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  3 in total

1.  Toward harmonizing ecotoxicity characterization in life cycle impact assessment.

Authors:  Peter Fantke; Nicoló Aurisano; Jane Bare; Thomas Backhaus; Cécile Bulle; Peter M Chapman; Dick De Zwart; Robert Dwyer; Alexi Ernstoff; Laura Golsteijn; Hanna Holmquist; Olivier Jolliet; Thomas E McKone; Mikołaj Owsianiak; Willie Peijnenburg; Leo Posthuma; Sandra Roos; Erwan Saouter; Diederik Schowanek; Nico M van Straalen; Martina G Vijver; Michael Hauschild
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Overview and recommendations for regionalized life cycle impact assessment.

Authors:  Chris Mutel; Xun Liao; Laure Patouillard; Jane Bare; Peter Fantke; Rolf Frischknecht; Michael Hauschild; Olivier Jolliet; Danielle Maia de Souza; Alexis Laurent; Stephan Pfister; Francesca Verones
Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.141

3.  Evaluation of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil.

Authors:  Jan E Groenenberg; Paul F A M Römkens; André Van Zomeren; Sonia M Rodrigues; Rob N J Comans
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 9.028

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.