Literature DB >> 23445000

Comparison of finite difference based methods to obtain sensitivities of stochastic chemical kinetic models.

Rishi Srivastava1, David F Anderson, James B Rawlings.   

Abstract

Sensitivity analysis is a powerful tool in determining parameters to which the system output is most responsive, in assessing robustness of the system to extreme circumstances or unusual environmental conditions, in identifying rate limiting pathways as a candidate for drug delivery, and in parameter estimation for calculating the Hessian of the objective function. Anderson [SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 50, 2237 (2012)] shows the advantages of the newly developed coupled finite difference (CFD) estimator over the common reaction path (CRP) [M. Rathinam, P. W. Sheppard, and M. Khammash, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 034103 (2010)] estimator. In this paper, we demonstrate the superiority of the CFD estimator over the common random number (CRN) estimator in a number of scenarios not considered previously in the literature, including the sensitivity of a negative log likelihood function for parameter estimation, the sensitivity of being in a rare state, and a sensitivity with fast fluctuating species. In all examples considered, the superiority of CFD over CRN is demonstrated. We also provide an example in which the CRN method is superior to the CRP method, something not previously observed in the literature. These examples, along with Anderson's results, lead to the conclusion that CFD is currently the best estimator in the class of finite difference estimators of stochastic chemical kinetic models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23445000      PMCID: PMC3592914          DOI: 10.1063/1.4790650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  16 in total

1.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene.

Authors:  Ertugrul M Ozbudak; Mukund Thattai; Iren Kurtser; Alan D Grossman; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-04-22       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression.

Authors:  William J Blake; Mads KAErn; Charles R Cantor; J J Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression.

Authors:  Jonathan M Raser; Erin K O'Shea
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Ultrasensitivity and noise propagation in a synthetic transcriptional cascade.

Authors:  Sara Hooshangi; Stephan Thiberge; Ron Weiss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sensitivity analysis of discrete stochastic systems.

Authors:  Rudiyanto Gunawan; Yang Cao; Linda Petzold; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  The finite state projection algorithm for the solution of the chemical master equation.

Authors:  Brian Munsky; Mustafa Khammash
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  An efficient and exact stochastic simulation method to analyze rare events in biochemical systems.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kuwahara; Ivan Mura
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells.

Authors:  A Arkin; J Ross; H H McAdams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression.

Authors:  H H McAdams; A Arkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A finite difference method for estimating second order parameter sensitivities of discrete stochastic chemical reaction networks.

Authors:  Elizabeth Skubak Wolf; David F Anderson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.488

View more
  4 in total

1.  Stochastic representations of ion channel kinetics and exact stochastic simulation of neuronal dynamics.

Authors:  David F Anderson; Bard Ermentrout; Peter J Thomas
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Parameter estimation in stochastic chemical kinetic models using derivative free optimization and bootstrapping.

Authors:  Rishi Srivastava; James B Rawlings
Journal:  Comput Chem Eng       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Long-time analytic approximation of large stochastic oscillators: Simulation, analysis and inference.

Authors:  Giorgos Minas; David A Rand
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Effective implicit finite-difference method for sensitivity analysis of stiff stochastic discrete biochemical systems.

Authors:  Monjur Morshed; Brian Ingalls; Silvana Ilie
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.615

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.