Literature DB >> 23444392

Priming of fixations during recognition of natural scenes.

Christian Valuch1, Stefanie I Becker, Ulrich Ansorge.   

Abstract

Eye fixations allow the human viewer to perceive scene content with high acuity. If fixations drive visual memory for scenes, a viewer might repeat his/her previous fixation pattern during recognition of a familiar scene. However, visual salience alone could account for similarities between two successive fixation patterns by attracting the eyes in a stimulus-driven, task-independent manner. In the present study, we tested whether the viewer's aim to recognize a scene fosters fixations on scene content that repeats from learning to recognition as compared to the influence of visual salience alone. In Experiment 1 we compared the gaze behavior in a recognition task to that in a free-viewing task. By showing the same stimuli in both tasks, the task-independent influence of salience was held constant. We found that during a recognition task, but not during (repeated) free viewing, viewers showed a pronounced preference for previously fixated scene content. In Experiment 2 we tested whether participants remembered visual input that they fixated during learning better than salient but nonfixated visual input. To that end we presented participants with smaller cutouts from learned and new scenes. We found that cutouts featuring scene content fixated during encoding were recognized better and faster than cutouts featuring nonfixated but highly salient scene content from learned scenes. Both experiments supported the hypothesis that fixations during encoding and maybe during recognition serve visual memory over and above a stimulus-driven influence of visual salience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23444392     DOI: 10.1167/13.3.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  9 in total

1.  The spatial distribution of attention predicts familiarity strength during encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  Michelle M Ramey; John M Henderson; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-04-06

2.  What Am I Looking at? Interpreting Dynamic and Static Gaze Displays.

Authors:  Margot van Wermeskerken; Damien Litchfield; Tamara van Gog
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-03-13

3.  Human Eye Movements After Viewpoint Shifts in Edited Dynamic Scenes are Under Cognitive Control.

Authors:  Raphael Seywerth; Christian Valuch; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-06-30

4.  Why do we retrace our visual steps? Semantic and episodic memory in gaze reinstatement.

Authors:  Michelle M Ramey; Andrew P Yonelinas; John M Henderson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Refixation patterns reveal memory-encoding strategies in free viewing.

Authors:  Radha Nila Meghanathan; Andrey R Nikolaev; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  False memories when viewing overlapping scenes.

Authors:  Filip Děchtěrenko; Jiří Lukavský
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Swipes and Saves: A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Aesthetic Assessments and Perceived Beauty of Mobile Phone Photographs.

Authors:  Helmut Leder; Jussi Hakala; Veli-Tapani Peltoketo; Christian Valuch; Matthew Pelowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-28

8.  Tracking down the path of memory: eye scanpaths facilitate retrieval of visuospatial information.

Authors:  Agata Bochynska; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

9.  Using Highlighting to Train Attentional Expertise.

Authors:  Brett Roads; Michael C Mozer; Thomas A Busey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.