Literature DB >> 23444106

Conceptualization of task boundaries preserves implicit sequence learning under dual-task conditions.

Kimberly M Halvorson1, Tana Truelove Wagschal, Eliot Hazeltine.   

Abstract

Implicit learning in the serial reaction time (SRT) task is sometimes disrupted by the presence of a secondary distractor task (e.g., Schumacher & Schwarb Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138:270-290, 2009) and at other times is not (e.g., Cohen, Ivry, & Keele Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16:17-30, 1990). In the present study, we used an instructional manipulation to investigate how participants' conceptualizations of the task affect sequence learning under dual-task conditions. Two experimental groups differed only in terms of the instructions and presequence training. One group was instructed that they were completing two separate tasks, whereas the other group was instructed that they were performing a single, integrated task. The separate group showed sequence learning, while the integrated group did not. These findings suggest that the conceptualization of task boundaries affects the availability of the sequential information necessary for implicit learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23444106     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0409-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  8 in total

Review 1.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 2.  Representing serial action and perception.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Luis Jiménez; Willem B Verwey; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

3.  Sequence learning under dual-task conditions: alternatives to a resource-based account.

Authors:  Luis Jiménez; Gustavo A Vázquez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-04-26

4.  Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.

Authors:  Eric H Schumacher; Hillary Schwarb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-05

5.  How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Hilde Haider
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Secondary-task effects on sequence learning.

Authors:  H Heuer; V Schmidtke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1996

7.  The boundaries of sequential modulations: evidence for set-level control.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Erin Lightman; Hillary Schwarb; Eric H Schumacher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Implicit sequence learning based on instructed task set.

Authors:  Robert Gaschler; Peter A Frensch; Asher Cohen; Dorit Wenke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.051

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  The impact of implicit and explicit suggestions that 'there is nothing to learn' on implicit sequence learning.

Authors:  Luc Vermeylen; Elger Abrahamse; Senne Braem; Davide Rigoni
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-08-04

2.  The illusion of control: Sequential dependencies underlie contingent attentional capture.

Authors:  Greg Huffman; Victoria M Antinucci; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

3.  Ego depletion impairs implicit learning.

Authors:  Kelsey R Thompson; Daniel J Sanchez; Abigail H Wesley; Paul J Reber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  No impact of instructions and feedback on task integration in motor learning.

Authors:  Harald Ewolds; Laura Broeker; Rita F de Oliveira; Markus Raab; Stefan Künzell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-10-08

5.  The impact of predictability on dual-task performance and implications for resource-sharing accounts.

Authors:  Laura Broeker; Harald Ewolds; Rita F de Oliveira; Stefan Künzell; Markus Raab
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-01-04

6.  Ways to Improve Multitasking: Effects of Predictability after Single- and Dual-Task Training.

Authors:  Harald Ewolds; Laura Broeker; Rita F de Oliveira; Markus Raab; Stefan Künzell
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2021-01-07

7.  Why Does Dual-Tasking Hamper Implicit Sequence Learning?

Authors:  Eva Röttger; Fang Zhao; Robert Gaschler; Hilde Haider
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2021-01-07

8.  Learning of across- and within-task contingencies modulates partial-repetition costs in dual-tasking.

Authors:  Lasse Pelzer; Christoph Naefgen; Robert Gaschler; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-04-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.