| Literature DB >> 23443392 |
Hummad Habib Qazi1, Abu Bakar bin Mohammad, Muhammad Akram.
Abstract
Optical chemical sensors have promoted escalating interest in the determination of various pollutants in the environment, which are creating toxicity and may cause serious health problems. This review paper focuses particularly on the recent progress and developments in this field; the working principles and basic classes of optical chemical sensors have been briefly described.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23443392 PMCID: PMC3571796 DOI: 10.3390/s121216522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.Structure of the paper.
Figure 2.Schematic of fiber-based evanescent wave fluorescence sensor [9], reproduced by the permission of Elsevier.
Figure 3.Schematic of an unclad U-bent multimode optical fiber [12]. reproduced by the permission of John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 4.Schematic of Mach-Zehnder configration.
Figure 5.The schematic of photoacoustic spectrometer [64], reproduced by the permission of Elsevier.
Recently reported optical chemical sensors for metal ions.
| 1 | Pb(II) | Ionophore (lead IV), proton-selective chromoionophore (ETH 5294) and lipophilic anionic sites (KTpClPB) | PVC membrane | Water sample | 1.26 × 10−8 to 3.16 × 10−5 mol·L−1 | 8.97 × 10−9 mol·L−1 | 7.0 | Na(I), K(I), Mg(II), Cd(II), Hg(II), Ag(I) | Absorption | [ |
| 2 | Pb(II) | Triazolothiadiazine | PVC membrane | Water sample | 5.0 × 10−8 to 3.8 × 10−4 M | 2.2 × 10−8 M | 5.0–6.0 | Good selectivity for Pb(II) over other metal ions | Fluorescence | [ |
| 3 | Pb(II) | 2,7-bis(2-Arsenophenylazo)-1,8-dihydroxynaphthalene-3,6-disulphonic acid (arsenazoIII or ASA III) | XAD-16 | Aqueous solution | 0.2 to 20.7 ppm | 0.01 ppm | 5.0 | Non-selective | Reflectance | [ |
| 4 | Pb(II) | Synthesized 5,10,15,20-tetra-(3-bromo-4-hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin (TBHPP) | PVC flim | Aqueous solution | 5 × 10−6 to 4 × 10−4 mol·L−1 | 4 × 10−8 μM | 6.0–7.8 | Selective for Pb(II) over Na(I), K(I), Ca(I), Mg(II), | Fluorescence | [ |
| 5 | Pb(II) | 4-Hydroxysalophen | -- | Aqueous solution | 1.0 × 10−3 to 1.0 × 10−7 mol·L−1 | 8.6 × 10−8 mol·L−1 | 3.7 | Excellent selectivity toward Pb(II) w.r.t other metal ions | Absorption | [ |
| 6 | Cu(II) | Functional CdS nanoparticles | -- | Water sample | 0.09 to 27.0 μg·L−1 | 3.2 ng·L−1 | 4.9 | Selectivity toward Cu(II) w.r.t other metal ions expect the Fe(III) | Fluorescence | [ |
| 7 | Cu(II) | 4,5-Disubstituted-1,8-naphthalimide derivatives | -- | Aqueous solution | -- | 2.48 ppm | 4.9–13 | Selectivive toward Cu(II) w.r.t other metal ions | Fluorescence | [ |
| 8 | Cu(II) | 4,5-Disubstituted-1,8-naphthalimide derivatives | -- | Aqueous solutions | -- | 0.52 ppm | 4.2–13 | Selectivive toward Cu(II) w.r.t other metal ions | Absorption | [ |
| 9 | Cu(II) | Functionalized-8-hydroxyquinoline | -- | Water samples | -- | 4.7 nM | 7.2 | Selective for Cu(II)over other ions | Fluorescence/Absorption | [ |
| 10 | Cu(II) | poly(2,5-di(Propyloxysulfonate)-1,4-phenyleneethynyl)-ene-9,10-anthrylene | -- | Buffer solution | 0.0 to 100,000 μmol·L−1 | 5.0 nmol·L−1 | 7.5 | Sensitive but less selective | Fluorescence | [ |
| 11 | Cu(II) | 1-Phenyl-1,2-propanedione-2-oxime thiosemi-carbazone (PPDOT) | Triacetylcellulosemembrane | Water sample | 7.5 × 10−6 to 2.0 × 10−4 | 8.0 × 10−7 μM | 5.8 | Sensitive but less selective | Absorption | [ |
| 12 | Cu(II) | 4-[( | Sol-gel matrix | Spring water samples | 2.5 to 50 μmol·L−1 | 4.7 × 10−7 μM | 5.0 | Poor selectivity | Fluorescence | [ |
| 13 | Hg(II) | tris[2-(4-Phenyldiazenyl)phenylaminoethoxy]cyclotriveratrylene (TPPECTV) | Triacetylcellulose membrane | River water | 0 to 2.0 × 10−5 M | 5.0 μM | 5.8 | Less selective | Absorbance | [ |
| 14 | Hg(II) | tris[2-(4-Phenyldiazenyl)phenylamino)ethoxy]cyclotriveratrylene (TPPECTV) | PVC film | River water | 1.0 × 10−6 to 2.5 × 10−4 M | 0.5 μM | 7.0 | Selective for Hg(II) inpresence of other ions | Absorbance | [ |
| 15 | Hg(II) | 4-Ethyl-5-hydroxy-5,6-dipyridin-2-yl-4,5-dihydro-2H-[1,2,4]-triazine-3-thione | PVC membrane | Tap water | 5.0 × 10−10 to 5.0 × 10−5 M | 1.8 × 10−7 μM | 5.5 | Highly selective for Hg(II) | Fluorescence | [ |
| 16 | Hg(II) | Quinolin-8-ol- | -- | Aqueous ethanol | 3 × 10−7 to 2 × 10−5 M | 2.2 × 10−8 μM | 5.0–9.0 | Excellentselectivity to Hg(II)over transitionmetalcations except Cu(II) | Fluorescence | [ |
| 17 | Hg(II) | 2,6-Pyridinedicarbox-aldehydebis( | -- | Aqueous solutions | 5.0 × 10−5 to 2.5 × 10−8 M | 5.0 × 10−8 μM | 6.5–7.5 | Highly selective for Hg(II) over Na(I), Ca(I), Mg(II) and Fe(II) | Luminescence | [ |
| 18 | Hg(II) | (1 | Agarose membrane | Aqueous solutions | 5.78 × 10−9 to 1.05 × 10−3 M | 1.71 × 10−9 μM | 4.0 | Highly selective to Hg(II)ion | Absorption | [ |
| 19 | Hg(II) | 2-[(2-sulfanylphenyl)ethanimidoyl]phenol | Agarosemembrane | Water sample | 1 × 10−2 to 1 × 10−5 mol·L−1 | 1 × 10−6 mol·L−1 | 4.5 | Presence of other has minor effects on the selective for Hg(II) | Absorption | [ |
| 20 | Hg(II) | 4-Phenyl-2,6-bis(2,3,5,6-tetrahydrobenzo[b][1,4,7]-trioxononin-9-yl)-pyrylium perchlorate | Sol-gel layer | Aqueous solution | 1.52 × 10−9to 1.70 × 10−2 M | 1.11 × 10−9 μM | 5.0 | Selective for Hg(II) in other cations | Absorption | [ |
| 21 | Hg(II) | 4-Phenyl-2,6-bis(2,3,5,6-tetrahydrobenzo[b][1,4,7]trioxo-nonyn-9-yl)pyrylium perchlorate | PVC membrane | Aqueous solution | 2.95 × 10−10 to 3.20 × 10−3 M | 1.01×10−1° μM | 5.0 | Selective for Hg(II)ions over other metal ions | Absorption | [ |
| 22 | Hg(II) | Rhodamine B derivative (RND) | PVC membrane | Environmental water | 1.0 × 10−9 to 2.0 × 10−3 M | 8.1 × 10−10 μM | 6.5 | Selective for Hg(II)ions with respect to other cations | Fluorescence | [ |
| 23 | Hg(II) | 4-[( | Sol-gel matrix | Spring water samples | 2.5 to 50 μmol·L−1 | 2.9 × 10−7 | 5.0 | Poor selectivity | Fluorescence | [ |
| 24 | Hg(II) | Tetrathia-12-crown-4 (TT12C4) | PVC membrane | aqueous solution | 9.5 × 10−9 to 1.8 × 10−5 mol·L−1 | 8.1 × 10−10 mol·L−1 | 7.0 | Selective and fully reversible | Absorption | [ |
| 25 | Hg(II) | 4-(2-Pyridylazo)-resorcinol (PAR) | tri-(2-Ethylhexyl) phosphate plasticized cellulose triacetate matrix | aqueous solution | 0.22 to 1.32 μg/mL | 0.11 μgm−1·L−1 | 7.5 | Sensitive but non-selective | Absorption | [ |
| 26 | Hg(II) | Hexathiacyclooctadecane | PVC membrane | Water samples | 2.1 × 10−7 to 1.2 × 10−4 mol·L−1 | 2.0 × 10−7 mol·L−1 | 4.0 | Selective and disposable | Absorption | [ |
| 27 | Cd(II) | 2-Amino-cyclopentene-1-dithiocarboxylic acid | Triacetylcellulose membrane | Water samples | 3.0 × 10−6 to 3.4 × 10−4 M | 1.0 × 10−6 M | 6.2 | Selective at certain pH value | Absorption | [ |
| 28 | Cd(II) | 4-Hydroxysalophen | Triacetyl cellulose | Aqueous solution | 1.0 × 10−6 to 5.0 × 10−2 M | 5.3 × 10−7 mol·L−1 | 6.0 | More selective for Cd(II) than Nafion sensor | Absorption | [ |
| 29 | Cd(II) | 1-(2-Pyridylazo)-2-naphthol (PAN) | Tri-(2-Ethylhexyl) Phosphate plasticized Cellulose Triacetate matrix | Water samples | 250 ng·mL−1 to 5,000 ng·mL−1 | 250 ng·L−1 | 7.5 | Selective at certain pH value | Absorption | [ |
| 30 | Cd(II) | 4-Hydroxysalophen | PVC membrane | Water samples | 1.0 × 10−6 to 1.0 × 10−1 mol·L−1 | 8.4 × 10−7 mol·L−1 | 2.8–8,1 | Sensitive and less selective | Absorption | [ |
| 31 | Cd(II) | Rhod-5N | -- | Buffered solutions | -- | 0.45 μg·L−1 | 7.0 | Good selectivity towards Cd (II) in the presence of Pb(II) | Fluorescence | [ |
| 32 | Ag(I) | 3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) | -- | Buffered solutions | -- | 50 nM | 4.0 | Selective toward Ag(I) in the presence of other metal ions | Absorption | [ |
| 33 | Zinc(II) | 1-Methyl-1-phenyl-3-[1-hydroxyimino-2-(succinimido)ethyl]-cyclobutane (MCB) | PVC membrane | Tap water | 8.0 × 10−8 to 1.6 × 10−4 mol·L−1 | 2.5 × 10−8 mol·L−1 | 6.0 | Less selective toward Zinc(II) in the presence of Co(II) and Ni(II) | Fluorescence | [ |
| 34 | Zinc(II) | 1-( | PVC membrane | -- | 5.0 × 10−3 to 1.0 × 10−6 M | 8.0 × 10−7 | 9.0 | Presence of Cu(II), Co(II)and Ni(II) affect selectivity | Fluorescence | [ |
| 35 | Zinc(II) | 4-Benzoxazol-2-yl-3-hydroxyphenylallyl ether | 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) | Tap river water | 8.0 × 10−5 to 4.0 × 10−3 mol·L−1 | 4.5 × 10−5 mol·L−1 | 3.73–9.19 | Good selectivityfor Zn(II) in the presence of Cd(II) | Fluorescence | [ |
| 36 | Zinc(II) | 8-Pyridylmethyloxy-2-methylquinoline | Water-soluble | Nutrition supplements/zinc gluconate solution of sanchine | 7.5 × 10−8 to 2.5 × 10−5M | 1.5 | 4.5–9.2 | Selective for Zn(II)In the presence ofother metal ions except for Cd(II) | Fluorescence | [ |
| 37 | Zinc(II) | N-Methyl-α,β,γ,δ-tetraphenylporphine (NMTPPH) | -- | Ethanol–water solution | 5.0 × 10−7 to 1.0 × 10−5 mol·L−1 | 1.5 × 10−7 mol·L−1 | 6.3–10.5 | Selective for Zn(II)affected by Cu(II) and Hg(II) | Fluorescence | [ |
| 38 | Fe(III) | Rhodamine-based thiacalix[4]arene derivative | -- | Ethanol water solution | 5.0×10−6 to 6.0 × 10−5 mol·L−1 | 3.5 × 10−8 mol·L−1 | 6.0 | Enhanced selectivity for Fe(III) | Fluorescence | [ |
| 39 | Fe(III) | 1-(D-Gluco-pyranosyl-20-deoxy-20-iminomethyl)-2-hydroxynaphthalene | -- | Aqueous HEPES buffer solution | -- | 280 ppb | 7.2 | Selective for Fe(III) in buffer solution | Absorption | [ |
| 40 | Fe(III) | Rhodamine-benzimidazole conjugate | -- | -- | 6 × 10−6 to 4 × 10−5 M | 1.5 ×10−8 M. | 4.0–14.0 | Selective to Fe(III) over other metal ions | Fluorescence | [ |
| 41 | Fe(III) | Poly(9-aminofluorene) | -- | HEPES buffer | 5.0 × 10−12 to 7.6 × 10−6 M | 3.7 × 10−12 | 7.0 | Selective towards Fe(III) | Fluorescence | [ |
| 42 | Cr(III) | Rhodamine-based thiacalix[4]arene derivative | PVC matrix | Ethanol water solution | 4.0×10−6 to 1.0 × 10−5 mol·L−1 | 1.6 ×10−7mol·L−1 | 6.0 | Enhanced selectivity for Cr(III) | Fluorescence | [ |
| 43 | Ni(II) | Thiazolotriazole derivative | PVC matrix | Aqueous solution | 1.0 × 10−9 to 4.4 × 10−3 M | 8.5 × 10−10 | 6.0 | Presence of other metal ions has minor effects on selectivity | Fluorescence | [ |
| 44 | Ni(II) | 3,7-Diamine-5-phenothiazoniom thionineacetate | Agarose membrane | Environmental water | 1.0 × 10−1° to 1.0 × 10−7 mol·L−1 | 9.3 × 10−11 mol·L−1 | 5.8 | Good selectivity towards Ni(II) in the presence of other metal ions | Absorption | [ |
| 45 | Ni(II) | Dibutylphthalate and 2-amino-1-cyclopentenedithio-carboxylic acid | PVC membrane | Water sample | 3.1 × 10−8 to 8.0 × 10−3 M | -- | -- | Selective towards Ni(II) with other metal ions expects Pb(II), Cd(II) and Al(III) | Absorption | [ |
| 46 | Ni(II) | 1,2-di( | PVC membrane | Water sample | 1.0 × 10−5 to 5.0 × 10−3 M | 8.5 × 10−6 μM | 6.0 | Selective to Ni(II) but presence of Hg(II), Cu(II) effects response time | Absorption | [ |
| 47 | UO2(II) | 6,7,9,10,12,13,15,16,23,24,25,26 dodecahydrodibenzo[n,v][1,4,7,10,13,17,20]pentaoxadiazacyclotricosine-22,27-dione | PVC membrane | Water sample | 4.3 × 10−6 to 2.5 × 10−8M | 8.0 × 10−9 M | 4.0 | Stable and selective towards UO2(II) | [ | |
| 48 | UO2(II) | 1-(2-Pyridylazo)-2-naphthol (PAN), tri- | PVC membrane | Water sample | 1.0 × 10−6 to 1.50 × 10−4M | 8.2 × 10−7 M. | 5.5 | Good selective towards UO2(II) | Absorption | [ |
| 49 | UO2(II) | 1,1′-2,2′-(1,2-Phenylene)bis(ethene-2,1-diyl)dinaphthalen-2-ol (PBED), dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and sodium tetraphenylborate (Na-TPB) | PVC membrane | Water sample | 3.9 × 10−6 to 8.0 × 10−5 mol·L−1 | 9.9 × 10−7 mol·L−1 | 3.0 | Selective to UO2(II) over alkali, alkaline earth, transition, and heavy metal ions | Absorption | [ |
| 50 | UO2(II) | C.I. Mordant Blue 29 (Chromazurol S)/cetyl N,N,N-trimethyl ammonium bromide | Triacetyl cellulose membrane | Water sample | 3.0 × 10−7 to 6.0 × 10−5mol·L−1 | 1.1 × 10−7 mol·L−1 | 4.5 | Presence of Cu(II), Fe(III) and Th(IV) in sample effect selectivity towards UO2(II) | Absorption | [ |
| 51 | Al(III) | -- | Water sample | 0.1 to 1.5 mM | 40 nM | 5.5 | Excellent selectivity for Al(III) over other metal ions | Fluorescence | [ | |
| 52 | Bi(III) | Methyltrioctyl-ammonium chloride | Triacetylcellulose membrane | water samples | 3.36 × 10−6 to 4.80 × 10−5 mol·L−1 | 1.02 × 10−6 mol·L−1 | -- | Less selective to Bi(III) in the presence of heavy metal ions | Absorption | [ |