Integrated whole-body PET/MR hybrid imaging: clinical experience.

OBJECTIVES: Integrated whole-body positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) scanners have recently been introduced and potentially offer new possibilities in hybrid imaging of oncologic patients. Integration of PET in a whole-body MR system requires new PET detector technology and new approaches to attenuation correction of PET data based on MR imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance and image quality parameters of integrated whole-body PET/MR hybrid imaging in intraindividual comparison with PET/CT in oncologic patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients underwent a single-injection, dual-imaging protocol including whole-body PET/computed tomography (CT) and subsequent whole-body PET/MR hybrid imaging. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed after adequate resting time (73 ± 13 minutes post injectionem of 227 ± 52.7 MBq Fluor-18-Fluordesoxyglucose, 3 minutes of acquisition time for each of 7 bed positions), followed by PET/MR (172 ± 33 minutes post injectionem, 10 minutes acquisition time for each of 4 bed positions). Positron emission tomographic data for both modalities were reconstructed iteratively. Two observers evaluated the following parameters: qualitative correlation of tracer-avid lesions in PET/CT versus PET/MR and PET image quality of PET/CT versus PET/MR. Magnetic resonance image quality of standard sequences (T1-weighted, T2-weighted), performance of the Dixon sequence for MR-based attenuation correction in comparison with corresponding T1-weighted images, artifacts in PET/MR data, and spatial coregistration of PET and MR data were evaluated by another observer.
RESULTS: In 70 of the 80 patients, both image data sets were complete. In these patients, 192 tracer-avid lesions were identified on PET/CT; 195, on PET/MR. A total of 187 lesions were identified concordantly by both modalities, and this corresponds to an agreement rate of 97.4%. The overall PET image quality was rated good to excellent for PET from PET/CT (12/28, excellent, 42.9%; 16/28, good, 57.1%; 0/28, poor, 0.0%) and slightly superior compared with PET from PET/MR, which was rated good (3/28, excellent, 10.7%; 20/28, good, 71.4%; 5/28, poor, 17.9%) in a subset of 28 patients. The overall image quality of the MR image data sets in all 70 of the 80 patients was rated excellent (260/280, excellent, 92.8%; 15/280, good, 5.4%; 5/280, poor, 1.8%). The Dixon sequence and conversion to μ-maps for MR-based attenuation correction provided robust tissue segmentation in all 280 bed positions of the acquired PET/MR data. No artifacts such as elevated noise and radiofrequency disturbances related to hardware cross talk between the PET and MR components in the hybrid system could be detected in the MR images. No major spatial mismatches between PET and MR data were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: Integrated PET/MR hybrid imaging is feasible in a clinical setting with similar detection rates as those of PET/CT. Attenuation correction can be performed sufficiently with Dixon sequences, although bone is disregarded. The administration of specific radiotracers and dedicated imaging sequences will foster this hybrid imaging modality in various indications.