Literature DB >> 23442190

Conceptualizing how couples talk about cancer.

Daena J Goldsmith1, Gregory A Miller.   

Abstract

Scholarship on couple communication about cancer employs variable conceptualizations of communication, and common measurement strategies make questionable assumptions about communication. This study provides a descriptive foundation for a multiple-topic, multidimensional approach to studying couple talk about cancer. Based on interviews with persons treated for cancer in the last 5 years and partners, we identified 16 topics and 5 dimensions of talk. "Talk about cancer" covers a broad range of issues. The frequency, openness, difficulty, and focus of talk vary considerably for different topics and can change over time or differ between partners. Disagreements were rare but highly salient, and satisfaction with talk tended to be high. These findings suggest we move away from abstract, general measures of couple communication and that we develop descriptive advice for couples, rather than simply prescribing "be open."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23442190     DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2012.717215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  12 in total

1.  The Dyadic Communicative Resilience Scale (DCRS): scale development, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Skye Chernichky-Karcher; Maria K Venetis; Helen Lillie
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Supporting cancer family caregivers: How can frontline oncology clinicians help?

Authors:  Laura S Porter; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Communication avoidance, coping and psychological distress of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Yisha Yu; Kerry A Sherman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-03-25

4.  Communication Efficacy and Couples' Cancer Management: Applying a Dyadic Appraisal Model.

Authors:  Kate Magsamen-Conrad; Maria G Checton; Maria K Venetis; Kathryn Greene
Journal:  Commun Monogr       Date:  2015-06-01

5.  Family communication challenges of adolescents and young adults with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: Implications for psychosocial care.

Authors:  Camella J Rising; Catherine Wilsnack; Patrick Boyd; Alix G Sleight; Sadie P Hutson; Payal P Khincha; Allison Werner-Lin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2022-07-20

6.  Uncovering Factors Influencing Interpersonal Health Communication.

Authors:  Lennie Donné; Carel Jansen; John Hoeks
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2017-06-14

7.  Randomized controlled trial of an 8-week intervention combining self-care and hypnosis for post-treatment cancer patients: study protocol.

Authors:  Charlotte Grégoire; Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville; Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse; Vanessa Charland-Verville; Guy Jerusalem; Isabelle Bragard
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Efficacy of a hypnosis-based intervention to improve well-being during cancer: a comparison between prostate and breast cancer patients.

Authors:  C Grégoire; H Nicolas; I Bragard; F Delevallez; I Merckaert; D Razavi; D Waltregny; M-E Faymonville; A Vanhaudenhuyse
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  How family caregivers of persons with advanced cancer assist with upstream healthcare decision-making: A qualitative study.

Authors:  J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Deborah Ejem; Rachel Wells; Amber E Barnato; Richard A Taylor; Gabrielle B Rocque; Yasemin E Turkman; Matthew Kenny; Nataliya V Ivankova; Marie A Bakitas; Michelle Y Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Talking but not always understanding: couple communication about infertility concerns after cancer.

Authors:  Alexandra Hawkey; Jane M Ussher; Janette Perz; Chloe Parton
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.