Amir Moussavi1, Markus Untenberger, Martin Uecker, Jens Frahm. 1. Biomedizinische NMR Forschungs GmbH am MPI für biophysikalische Chemie, Göttingen, Germany; DFG Research Center for Molecular Physiology of the Brain (CMPB), Göttingen, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To correct gradient-induced phase errors in radial MRI. METHODS: Gradient-induced eddy currents affect the MRI data acquisition by gradient delays and phase errors that may lead to severe image artifacts for non-Cartesian imaging scenarios such as radial trajectories. While gradient delays are dealt with by respective shifts of the acquisition window during radial image acquisition, this work introduces a simple method for quantifying and correcting phase errors from the actual data prior to image reconstruction. For a given gradient system, the approach yields a specific phase error per gradient that can be used for correcting the raw data. RESULTS: Phantom studies at 9.4 T demonstrated marked improvements in radial image quality. It could be shown that the phase correction is not compromised by data undersampling. Moreover, the selective correction of gradient-induced phase errors retained the phase information caused by different concentrations of a paramagnetic contrast agent. CONCLUSION: The proposed method does not require additional reference measurements and separately corrects for phase errors induced by eddy currents, while retaining the residual phase of the object which may carry physiologic information.
PURPOSE: To correct gradient-induced phase errors in radial MRI. METHODS: Gradient-induced eddy currents affect the MRI data acquisition by gradient delays and phase errors that may lead to severe image artifacts for non-Cartesian imaging scenarios such as radial trajectories. While gradient delays are dealt with by respective shifts of the acquisition window during radial image acquisition, this work introduces a simple method for quantifying and correcting phase errors from the actual data prior to image reconstruction. For a given gradient system, the approach yields a specific phase error per gradient that can be used for correcting the raw data. RESULTS: Phantom studies at 9.4 T demonstrated marked improvements in radial image quality. It could be shown that the phase correction is not compromised by data undersampling. Moreover, the selective correction of gradient-induced phase errors retained the phase information caused by different concentrations of a paramagnetic contrast agent. CONCLUSION: The proposed method does not require additional reference measurements and separately corrects for phase errors induced by eddy currents, while retaining the residual phase of the object which may carry physiologic information.
Authors: Wen Cao; Yulin V Chang; Erin K Englund; Hee Kwon Song; Suliman Barhoum; Zachary B Rodgers; Michael C Langham; Felix W Wehrli Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-03-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Axel J Krafft; Ralf B Loeffler; Ruitian Song; Aaryani Tipirneni-Sajja; M Beth McCarville; Matthew D Robson; Jane S Hankins; Claudia M Hillenbrand Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Pei-Hsin Wu; Ana E Rodríguez-Soto; Andrew Wiemken; Erin K Englund; Zachary B Rodgers; Michael C Langham; Richard J Schwab; John A Detre; Wensheng Guo; Felix W Wehrli Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 6.960
Authors: Anagha Deshmane; Martin Blaimer; Felix Breuer; Peter Jakob; Jeffrey Duerk; Nicole Seiberlich; Mark Griswold Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Fabrizio Donati; C Alberto Figueroa; Nicolas P Smith; Pablo Lamata; David A Nordsletten Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 8.545