Literature DB >> 21831933

Management of intrathoracic oesophageal perforation: analysis of 16 cases.

M Tettey1, F Edwin, E Aniteye, L Sereboe, M Tamatey, K Entsua-Mensah, D Kotei, K Frimpong-Boateng.   

Abstract

Intrathoracic oesophageal perforation remains a life-threatening lesion that requires early diagnosis and the appropriate intervention in order to reduce morbidity and mortality. Management depends largely on the cause of the perforation, the integrity of the oesophagus and the time lapse between the perforation and the commencement of treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the management options that were employed in the treatment of patients with oesophageal perforation and the outcome. The records of 16 patients (11 males and 5 females) who had been operated on from 1994-2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Their ages ranged between 2-66 years (mean 36.4). Malignant oesophageal perforations were excluded from the study. The aetiology was iatrogenic in 10 (62.5%), foreign bodies five (31.2%) and spontaneous one (6.2%). Six patients (37.5%) presented within 24 h of their injury and 10 (62.5%) presented after 24 h. Thoracotomy and intrathoracic primary repair was possible in five (31.2%) cases. Oesophagectomy, cervical oesophagostomy and feeding gastrostomy were carried out in 11 (68.8%). Oesophageal substitution was by colon, routed retrosternally. One patient (6.2%) died after oesophagectomy from overwhelming sepsis. Oesophageal perforation is a life-threatening condition. Early diagnosis and the institution of prompt and appropriate treatment ensure good outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21831933     DOI: 10.1258/td.2011.110120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Doct        ISSN: 0049-4755            Impact factor:   0.731


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cardiothoracic surgical experience in Ghana.

Authors:  Mark Tettey; Martin Tamatey; Frank Edwin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-10

2.  Application of Oesophagogastric Cervical Mechanical Anastomosis in Oesophagectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  Zhong Chen; Ning Zhang; Xiao Chen
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 3.  Is oesophagectomy or conservative treatment for delayed benign oesophageal perforation the better option?

Authors:  Kelechi E Okonta; Emeka B Kesieme
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-06-13

Review 4.  Current treatment and outcome of esophageal perforations in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of 75 studies.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Vito D'Andrea; Rosalba Paone; Carlo Di Marco; Grazia Savino; Vesa Koivukangas; Juha Saarnio; Ersilia Lucenteforte
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  T-tube placement as a method for treating penetrating oesophageal injuries.

Authors:  Roger Christopher Gill; K M Inam Pal; Fatima Mannan; Amber Bawa; Saulat H Fatimi
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-01-04

6.  Long Standing Esophageal Perforation due to Foreign Body Impaction in Children: A Therapeutic Challenge in a Resource Limited Setting.

Authors:  Ngo Nonga Bernadette; Jean Jacques Ze; Angele O Pondy; Claude M Kalla; Nelly Kamgaing; Daniel Handy Eone
Journal:  Case Rep Pediatr       Date:  2017-08-08

7.  Challenges faced in the management of complicated Boerhaave syndrome: a tertiary care center experience.

Authors:  Sakthivel Harikrishnan; Chandramohan Servarayan Murugesan; Raveena Karthikeyan; Kanagavel Manickavasagam; Balaji Singh
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-06-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.