Literature DB >> 23439171

Variability of blood glucose meters for patient self-testing: analysis of the article by Brazg and coauthors.

Andreas Pfützner1.   

Abstract

The article by Brzag and coauthors in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology reports a competitive accuracy performance study for a branded meter in comparison with six low-cost meters currently available in the United States. It highlights several important topics: (1) the need for more stringent post-marketing requirements for blood glucose meters after launch and (2) low-cost meters use older technologies and their manufacturers do not usually seriously invest in new technology or constant quality assurance efforts. This may explain the study results, which show superior performance of the branded meter. Finally, the article pinpoints to the "quality versus price" dilemma faced by the prescribing physician and their patients in daily routine, which may be additionally aggravated by budget constraints and prescription rules in reimbursed markets.
© 2013 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23439171      PMCID: PMC3692227          DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  3 in total

1.  Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers.

Authors:  Ronald L Brazg; Leslie J Klaff; Christopher G Parkin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-01

2.  Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197.

Authors:  Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Christina Schmid; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

3.  Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; Michael Mitri; Petra B Musholt; Daniela Sachsenheimer; Marcus Borchert; Andrew Yap; Thomas Forst
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.580

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Accuracy Evaluation of CONTOUR(®)PLUS Compared With Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.

Authors:  Nancy Dunne; Maria T Viggiani; Scott Pardo; Cynthia Robinson; Joan Lee Parkes
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.945

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.