Literature DB >> 2343874

Mortality from lung cancer among workers employed in formaldehyde industries.

A Blair1, P A Stewart, R N Hoover.   

Abstract

A historical cohort of 26,561 workers employed in ten facilities was assembled to evaluate cancer risks associated with exposure to formaldehyde. Historical exposures to formaldehyde by job, work area, plant, and calendar time were estimated using monitoring data available from participating plants, comments from long-term workers and company officials, exposure evaluations from walk-through surveys conducted by project industrial hygienists, and results from monitoring specifically performed for this project. A previous report of findings from this study noted a 30% excess mortality from lung cancer among wage workers. The relative risk for lung cancer (whether estimated by SMRs or SRRs) 20 or more years after first exposure did not generally rise with increasing exposure to formaldehyde. Various estimates of exposure were investigated including duration, intensity, peak, cumulative, and average, and by exposures lagged by 5, 10, 20, and 30 years. The excess did not appear to arise gradually, but emerged suddenly among workers whose total cumulative exposure was less than 0.1 ppm-years. Slightly positive, but nonsignificant, exposure-response associations between lung cancer and level of formaldehyde occurred in only a few out of a large number of comparisons (e.g., for persons hired before the start dates for the study and for workers also exposed to particulates). There was a lack of consistency among the various plants for risk of lung cancer, with six plants having elevated SMRs and four plants having deficits. Mortality from lung cancer was more strongly associated with exposure to other substances including phenol, melamine, urea, and wood dust than with exposure to formaldehyde. Workers exposed to formaldehyde without exposure to these substances did not experience an elevated mortality from lung cancer. The risk did not increase with cumulative levels of formaldehyde among those exposed to other substances and there was a slightly negative trend for those exposed to formaldehyde alone. Although some role for formaldehyde, particularly in association with other substances, in the excess of lung cancer seen among these workers cannot be ruled out, these findings suggest that exposure to phenol, melamine, urea, wood dust or other exposures also occurring in the area where these substances were used (i.e., production of resin and molding compounds) may play a more primary role. This association should be further evaluated in other studies that include workers from resin and molding compound operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2343874     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700170604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  6 in total

1.  Mortality among chemical workers in a factory where formaldehyde was used.

Authors:  G M Marsh; R A Stone; N A Esmen; V L Henderson; K Y Lee
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Carcinogenic potential of formaldehyde in occupational settings: a critical assessment and possible impact on occupational exposure levels.

Authors:  S Duhayon; P Hoet; G Van Maele-Fabry; D Lison
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Childhood cancer survivorship research in minority populations: A position paper from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Smita Bhatia; Todd M Gibson; Kirsten K Ness; Qi Liu; Kevin C Oeffinger; Kevin R Krull; Paul C Nathan; Joseph P Neglia; Wendy Leisenring; Yutaka Yasui; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Critical review and synthesis of the epidemiologic evidence on formaldehyde exposure and risk of leukemia and other lymphohematopoietic malignancies.

Authors:  Harvey Checkoway; Paolo Boffetta; Diane J Mundt; Kenneth A Mundt
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 5.  Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ward; Paul A Schulte; Steve Bayard; Aaron Blair; Paul Brandt-Rauf; Mary Ann Butler; David Dankovic; Ann F Hubbs; Carol Jones; Myra Karstadt; Gregory L Kedderis; Ronald Melnick; Carrie A Redlich; Nathaniel Rothman; Russell E Savage; Michael Sprinker; Mark Toraason; Ainsley Weston; Andrew F Olshan; Patricia Stewart; Sheila Hoar Zahm
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Chemicals and cancer in humans: first evidence in experimental animals.

Authors:  J Huff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.