Literature DB >> 23436859

Frequency of and risk factors for complications after liver radiofrequency ablation under CT fluoroscopic guidance in 1500 sessions: single-center experience.

Haruyuki Takaki1, Koichiro Yamakado, Atsuhiro Nakatsuka, Tomomi Yamada, Katsuya Shiraki, Yoshiyuki Takei, Kan Takeda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to retrospectively evaluate the frequency of and risk factors for complications after liver radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 656 patients (with 1755 liver tumors) who underwent 1500 CT fluoroscopy-guided liver RFA sessions. Of those patients, 501 had primary liver tumor and 155 had liver metastases. Mortality and treatment-related complications were documented. Complications were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). Major complications were defined as grade 3 or higher adverse events. Factors affecting frequent complications with a frequency of 1% or more were detected using multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Two deaths (0.1% [2/1500]) occurred. One patient died of liver failure subsequent to hemorrhage, and the other died of liver failure. The major complication rate was 2.8% (42/1500). The most frequent major complication was hemorrhage (1.1% [16/1500]). The absence of arterial embolization before RFA (p < 0.01), low hemoglobin level (p < 0.04), and elevated serum creatinine level (p < 0.04) were identified as significant risk factors for major hemorrhage. The minor complication rate was 17.1% (257/1500). Pneumothorax (7.7% [116/1500]) was the most frequent minor complication, followed by hemorrhage (7.0% [105/1500]). A transthoracic approach (p < 0.01) and subphrenic tumor location (p < 0.01) were significant risk factors for pneumothorax, and the use of a cluster needle (p < 0.02) and multiple tumors (p < 0.01) were significant risk factors for minor hemorrhage.
CONCLUSION: CT fluoroscopy-guided RFA is a safe procedure with an acceptably low rate of major complications for liver tumor treatment. Factors identified in this study will help to stratify high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23436859     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.8691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  13 in total

1.  Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: contemporary treatment trends and outcomes from the United States National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Johannes Uhlig; Cortlandt M Sellers; Stacey M Stein; Hyun S Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Complications of image-guided thermal ablation of liver and kidney neoplasms.

Authors:  Kyung Rae Kim; Sarah Thomas
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Ablation protocols and ancillary procedures in tumor ablation therapy: consensus from Japanese experts.

Authors:  Masaya Miyazaki; Toshihiro Iguchi; Haruyuki Takaki; Takashi Yamanaka; Yoshitaka Tamura; Hiroyuki Tokue; Yozo Sato; Osamu Ikeda; Tadashi Shimizu; Koichiro Yamakado
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 4.  Interventional Oncology Approach to Hepatic Metastases.

Authors:  Cathal O'Leary; Michael C Soulen; Susan Shamimi-Noori
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Adverse effects of irreversible electroporation of malignant liver tumors under CT fluoroscopic guidance: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Marco Dollinger; Lukas Philipp Beyer; Michael Haimerl; Christoph Niessen; Ernst Michael Jung; Florian Zeman; Christian Stroszczynski; Philipp Wiggermann
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  Phase Contrast Imaging Based Microbubble Monitoring of Radiofrequency Ablation: An ex vivo Study.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Jian Lu; Rongbiao Tang; Zhiyuan Wu; Qingbing Wang; Xiaoyi Ding; Zhongmin Wang; Kemin Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Percutaneous transcatheter embolisation of active haemorrhage following radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Adam A Dmytriw; Michael Devin Rivers-Bowerman; Joel Woodley-Cook
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-05-26

8.  Avatrombopag and lusutrombopag for thrombocytopenia in people with chronic liver disease needing an elective procedure: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Nigel Armstrong; Nasuh Büyükkaramikli; Hannah Penton; Rob Riemsma; Pim Wetzelaer; Vanesa Huertas Carrera; Stephanie Swift; Thea Drachen; Heike Raatz; Steve Ryder; Dhwani Shah; Titas Buksnys; Gill Worthy; Steven Duffy; Maiwenn Al; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  Incidence and Risk Factors for Liver Abscess After Thermal Ablation of Liver Neoplasm.

Authors:  Xiu-Feng Su; Na Li; Xu-Fang Chen; Lei Zhang; Ming Yan
Journal:  Hepat Mon       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 0.660

Review 10.  Bronchobiliary fistula after ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma adjacent to the diaphragm: Case report and literature review.

Authors:  Zhi-Mei Huang; Meng-Xuan Zuo; Yang-Kui Gu; Chun-Xiao Lai; Qiu-Xiang Pan; Xiao-Cheng Yi; Tian-Qi Zhang; Jin-Hua Huang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.