| Literature DB >> 27642345 |
Xiu-Feng Su1, Na Li2, Xu-Fang Chen3, Lei Zhang4, Ming Yan5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are the most frequently used thermal ablation methods for the treatment of liver cancer. Liver abscess is a common and severe complication of thermal ablation treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Ablation; Incidence; Liver Abscess; Liver Neoplasm; Risk Factors
Year: 2016 PMID: 27642345 PMCID: PMC5018304 DOI: 10.5812/hepatmon.34588
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hepat Mon ISSN: 1735-143X Impact factor: 0.660
Figure 1.A 66-Year-Old Patient With Multiple Tumors Who Underwent RFA Via Percutaneous Puncture
A, contrast-enhanced transverse CT obtained during the arterial phase shows irregular liver tumors (arrows) with maximum diameters of 4.6 cm and 3.5 cm, in liver segments VII and II, respectively. The latter tumor is located in the porta hepatis; B, on the 6th postoperative day, the patient underwent CT due to fever and chills. CT showed gas (triangular mark) forming in the low-attenuation ablation zone (arrow), indicating formation of a liver abscess. Cultures from puncture aspiration were positive for Escherichia coli; C, in addition to treatment with carbapenem antibiotics, catheter drainage (arrows) by percutaneous puncture under ultrasonic guidance was administered, and pus was aspirated. Four weeks later, the patient had recovered.
Figure 2.Patient with Child-Pugh Class-C Cirrhosis Who Underwent MWA Treatment of Liver Cancer With Percutaneous Puncture
A, contrast-enhanced transverse CT imaging shows a 2.8 × 2.1 cm liver tumor (arrow) in segment IV and an irregular tumor (arrow) measuring approximately 2 × 1.5 cm, located close to the top of the right kidney in segment VI; B, after MWA, contrast-enhanced transverse CT imaging showed an oval low-density lesion (arrows); C, three days after the operation, hyperpyrexia occurred, with body temperature reaching 39.0°C. One week after the operation, contrast-enhanced CT showed an expanded ablation zone with pneumatosis, suggesting the formation of a liver abscess (arrows); D, catheter drainage of the liver abscess.
Clinical Characteristics of Patients and Tumors[a]
| Patient and Tumor Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
|
| 57.0 ± 14.8 |
|
| |
| Male/female | 338/85 |
|
| |
| HCC/MHC/IHCC | 352/64/7 |
|
| 767 |
|
| 3.5 ± 2.3 |
|
| |
| I/II/III/IV | 3/143/151/138 |
| V/VI/VII/VIII | 88/152/43/48 |
|
| 46 |
|
| |
| Solitary/multiple | 290/133 |
|
| |
| A/B/C | 268/138/17 |
|
| 282 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 53 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 56 |
|
| 205 |
|
| |
| ALT, U/L | 43.4 ± 2.8 |
|
| 37.8 ± 3.2 |
|
| 27.2 ± 7.4 |
|
| 106 |
|
| |
| Local/intravenous | 260/163 |
|
| |
| Percutaneous/abdominal/laparoscopic | 407/13/3 |
|
| |
| RFA/MWA | 385/306 |
|
| 16.2 ± 7.5 |
|
| |
| CT/MR/puncture fluid culture | 9/2/1 |
aValues are expressed as No. or mean ± SD.
Baseline Characteristics of Patients With Liver Abscesses After Thermal Ablation
| Patient Sequence No. Basic Characteristics of Patients | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Male | Male | Male | Female | Male | Male | Male | Female | Male | Male | Male | Male |
|
| 70 | 64 | 66 | 68 | 50 | 56 | 44 | 55 | 72 | 76 | 57 | 65 |
|
| HCC | MHC | HCC | HHC | ICC | HCC | HCC | ICC | HCC | HCC | ICC | HCC |
|
| 4.5 | 2.2 | 4.6 | 3.2 | 2.4 | 5.5 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 8.5 |
|
| 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
|
| IV | VIII | II,VII | IV | I | IV | VII,VIII | V | VI | IV,V | VI | II,III |
|
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
| Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No |
|
| Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
|
| Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes |
|
| No | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No |
|
| Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
|
| Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes |
|
| B | A | B | C | A | A | C | A | B | C | A | B |
|
| 33 | 21 | 46 | 77 | 35 | 35 | 42 | 55 | 36 | 48 | 19 | 88 |
|
| 31 | 45 | 28 | 27 | 38 | 34 | 29 | 41 | 35 | 29 | 38 | 32 |
|
| 57 | 77 | 60 | 44 | 90 | 85 | 48 | 76 | 58 | 42 | 100 | 55 |
|
| 33.5 | 11.0 | 37.4 | 44.4 | 31.0 | 14.5 | 19.3 | 66.2 | 28.0 | 36.5 | 24.2 | 33.0 |
|
| Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
|
| Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
| Local | Int | Local | Int | Int | Loca | Local | Local | Int | Int | Int | Local |
|
| Perc | Abd | Perc | Perc | Perc | Perc | Perc | Perc | Perc | Perc | Perc | Perc |
|
| RFA | MWA | MWA | RFA | RFA | RFA | MWA | RFA | RFA | MWA | RFA | MWA |
|
| 36 | 11 | 29 | 20 | 32 | 40 | 9 | 14 | 21 | 22 | 58 | 65 |
|
| 55 | 37 | 3 | 32 | 5 | 3 | 28 | 12 | 6 | 20 | 4 | 1 |
|
| CT | CT | CT | CT | MR | CT | CT | CT | CT | MR | MR | CT |
|
| Dra | Asp | Drug | Dra | Dra | Dra | Drug | Asp | Ope | Dra | Dra | Dra |
|
| Pos | Neg | Pos | Pos | Neg | Pos | Neg | Neg | Pos | Neg | Pos | Pos |
|
| Rec | Rec | Rec | Death | Rec | Rec | Rec | Rec | Rec | Rec | Rec | Rec |
Abbreviations: Abd, Abdominal; Asp, Aspiration; Dra, Drainage; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; ICC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; Int, intravenous; MHC, metastatic hepatic carcinoma; Neg, negative; Ope, Operation; Perc, Percutaneous; Positive, Positive; Rec, Recovery.
Influence of Treatment Method on Development of Liver Abscess After Thermal Ablation
| RFA | MWA | Ablation Combined With PEI | Ablation Alone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 7 | 5 | 0 | 12 |
|
| 378 | 299 | 73 | 606 |
|
| 385 | 306 | 73 | 618 |
|
| 1.18 | 1.18 | 15.74 | 15.74 |
|
| 0.812 | 0.812 | 0.0026 | 0.0026 |
Relationships Between Risk Factor Variables and Abscess Formation After RFA and MWA Treatment[a]
| Risk Factor Variables | Incidence of Liver Abscess | P Value | Odds Ratio | Confidence Interval With Odds Ratio of 95% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk factor Group | Control Group | ||||
|
| 1.6 | 2.4 | 0.4562 | 0.643 | 0.775 - 1.685 |
| Male/female | 9/569 | 3/122 | |||
|
| 52.3 ± 10.2 | 54.8 ± 11.3 | 0.8851 | 0.986 | 0.534 - 1.655 |
|
| 4.2 ± 2.6 | 3.6 ± 3.2 | 0.2326 | 1.788 | 0.810 - 2.693 |
|
| 42.4 ± 2.1 | 36.5 ± 4.6 | 0.1536 | 2.012 | 0.698 - 2.874 |
|
| 32.2 ± 3.7 | 38.1 ± 2.4 | 0.4605 | 0.651 | 0.513 - 1.725 |
|
| 29.6 ± 7.6 | 25.3 ± 6.4 | 0.6664 | 0.734 | 0.438 - 1.654 |
|
| 17.0 ± 4.3 | 15.8 ± 6.6 | 0.6544 | 0.729 | 0.502 - 1.678 |
|
| 1.7 | 1.8 | 0.7966 | 0.925 | 0.668 - 1.774 |
| left lobe/right lobe | 5/301 | 7/390 | |||
|
| 2.2 | 1.6 | 0.5218 | 1.378 | 0.564 - 1.838 |
| Ratio | 4/184 | 8/507 | |||
|
| 3.6 | 0.6 | 0.0386 | 6.300 | 1.372 - 18.802 |
| Ratio | 8/223 | 3/468 | |||
|
| 1.7 | 1.9 | 0.6977 | 0.897 | 0.614 - 1.662 |
| Ratio | 9/532 | 3/159 | |||
|
| 2.9 | 1.6 | 0.1313 | 1.832 | 0.649 - 3.328 |
| Ratio | 2/68 | 10/623 | |||
|
| 13.0 | 1.0 | 0.0123 | 13.370 | 1.233 - 88.232 |
| Ratio | 6/46 | 6/615 | |||
|
| 6.7 | 1.0 | 0.0305 | 6.764 | 1.112 - 22.855 |
| Ratio | 6/89 | 6/602 | |||
|
| 42.9 | 1.3 | 0.0015 | 32.76 | 1.975 - 96.741 |
| Ratio | 3/7 | 9/688 | |||
|
| 6.5 | 1.1 | 0.0344 | 5.696 | 1.020 - 20.374 |
| Ratio | 5/77 | 7/614 | |||
|
| 2.1 | 1.5 | 0.5524 | 1.399 | 0.578 - 1.902 |
| Ratio | 6/288 | 6/403 | |||
|
| 1.3 | 2.1 | 0.3636 | 0.597 | 0.522 - 1.688 |
| Ratio | 4/315 | 8/376 | |||
|
| 2.8 | 1.5 | 0.3321 | 1.840 | 0.638 - 2.965 |
| Ratio | 3/106 | 9/585 | |||
|
| 1.5 | 2.2 | 0.4950 | 0.703 | 0.570 - 1.655 |
| Ratio | 7/460 | 5/231 | |||
|
| 1.6 | 3.8 | 0.0612 | 0.430 | 0.522 - 1.587 |
| Ratio | 11/665 | 1/26 | |||
|
| 1.4 | 1.8 | 0.7812 | 0.819 | 0.465 - 1.887 |
| Ratio | 1/69 | 11/622 | |||
aValues are expressed as mean ± SD or %.