Literature DB >> 23436601

A review of RSPCA research into wildlife rehabilitation.

A Grogan1, A Kelly.   

Abstract

Wildlife rehabilitation is defined as 'the treatment and temporary care of injured, diseased, and displaced indigenous animals, and the subsequent release of healthy animals to appropriate habitats in the wild' (Miller 2012). Vets are frequently presented with wildlife casualties and although there are a number of texts available to help vets with the treatment of wild animals, such as the BSAVA Manual of Wildlife Casualties (Mullineaux and others 2003) and papers produced by experienced wildlife vets (eg, Bexton and Couper 2010, Couper and Bexton 2012), there still remains questions regarding which individual animals can, or should, be treated, which animals will survive treatment and which animals will survive after they have been released back to the wild. The RSPCA believes that the welfare of wildlife casualties can be improved by investigating which injuries or illnesses are most likely to result in a successful release for each species, and by collecting data on postrelease survivorship. As a result, there have been a number of papers published based on the work of the RSPCA's four wildlife centres: East Winch in Norfolk, Mallydams Wood in East Sussex, Stapeley Grange in Cheshire and West Hatch in Somerset. This paper summarises this research, to guide those in the profession with an interest in this subject to papers that may prove useful to them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23436601     DOI: 10.1136/vr.101139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Rec        ISSN: 0042-4900            Impact factor:   2.695


  7 in total

1.  Chlamydiaceae in North Atlantic Seabirds Admitted to a Wildlife Rescue Center in Western France.

Authors:  R Aaziz; P Gourlay; F Vorimore; K Sachse; V I Siarkou; K Laroucau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Morbidity, outcomes and cost-benefit analysis of wildlife rehabilitation in Catalonia (Spain).

Authors:  Rafael Angel Molina-López; Santi Mañosa; Alex Torres-Riera; Manel Pomarol; Laila Darwich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The impact of human activities on Australian wildlife.

Authors:  Alyce Taylor-Brown; Rosie Booth; Amber Gillett; Erica Mealy; Steven M Ogbourne; Adam Polkinghorne; Gabriel C Conroy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  A Review of Australian Animal Welfare Legislation, Regulation, Codes of Practice, and Policy, and Their Influence on Stakeholders Caring for Wildlife and the Animals for Whom They Care.

Authors:  Bruce Englefield; Simone A Blackman; Melissa Starling; Paul D McGreevy
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  A Trial of a Solar-Powered, Cooperative Sensor/Actuator, Opto-Acoustical, Virtual Road-Fence to Mitigate Roadkill in Tasmania, Australia.

Authors:  Bruce Englefield; Steven G Candy; Melissa Starling; Paul D McGreevy
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Trends in intake and outcomes for European hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) in the Czech rescue centers.

Authors:  Gabriela Lukešová; Eva Voslarova; Vladimir Vecerek; Marijana Vucinic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Experimental Release of Orphaned Wild Felids into a Tropical Rainforest in Southwestern Costa Rica.

Authors:  Víctor H Montalvo; Isabel Hagnauer; Juan C Cruz-Díaz; Brayan Morera; Kevin Lloyd; Carolina Sáenz-Bolaños; Todd K Fuller; Eduardo Carrillo
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.