Literature DB >> 23436283

Patient-reported outcomes after 3-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, or proton beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Phillip J Gray1, Jonathan J Paly, Beow Y Yeap, Martin G Sanda, Howard M Sandler, Jeff M Michalski, James A Talcott, John J Coen, Daniel A Hamstra, William U Shipley, Stephen M Hahn, Anthony L Zietman, Justin E Bekelman, Jason A Efstathiou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested differing toxicity patterns for patients with prostate cancer who receive treatment with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), or proton beam therapy (PBT).
METHODS: The authors reviewed patient-reported outcomes data collected prospectively using validated instruments that assessed bowel and urinary quality of life (QOL) for patients with localized prostate cancer who received 3DCRT (n = 123), IMRT (n = 153) or PBT (n = 95). Clinically meaningful differences in mean QOL scores were defined as those exceeding half the standard deviation of the baseline mean value. Changes from baseline were compared within groups at the first post-treatment follow-up (2-3 months from the start of treatment) and at 12 months and 24 months.
RESULTS: At the first post-treatment follow-up, patients who received 3DCRT and IMRT, but not those who received PBT, reported a clinically meaningful decrement in bowel QOL. At 12 months and 24 months, all 3 cohorts reported clinically meaningful decrements in bowel QOL. Patients who received IMRT reported clinically meaningful decrements in the domains of urinary irritation/obstruction and incontinence at the first post-treatment follow-up. At 12 months, patients who received PBT, but not those who received IMRT or 3DCRT, reported a clinically meaningful decrement in the urinary irritation/obstruction domain. At 24 months, none of the 3 cohorts reported clinically meaningful changes in urinary QOL.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received 3DCRT, IMRT, or PBT reported distinct patterns of treatment-related QOL. Although the timing of toxicity varied between the cohorts, patients reported similar modest QOL decrements in the bowel domain and minimal QOL decrements in the urinary domains at 24 months. Prospective randomized trials are needed to further examine these differences.
Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23436283      PMCID: PMC3759976          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  42 in total

1.  Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic.

Authors:  Lawrence B Marks; Ellen D Yorke; Andrew Jackson; Randall K Ten Haken; Louis S Constine; Avraham Eisbruch; Søren M Bentzen; Jiho Nam; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Prospective preference assessment of patients' willingness to participate in a randomized controlled trial of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus proton therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anand Shah; Jason A Efstathiou; Jonathan J Paly; Scott D Halpern; Deborah W Bruner; John P Christodouleas; John J Coen; Curtiland Deville; Neha Vapiwala; William U Shipley; Anthony L Zietman; Stephen M Hahn; Justin E Bekelman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Symptom indexes to assess outcomes of treatment for early prostate cancer.

Authors:  J A Clark; J A Talcott
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  J T Wei; R L Dunn; M S Litwin; H M Sandler; M G Sanda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Late rectal toxicity after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer (I): multivariate analysis and dose-response.

Authors:  M W Skwarchuk; A Jackson; M J Zelefsky; E S Venkatraman; D M Cowen; S Levegrün; C M Burman; Z Fuks; S A Leibel; C C Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, proton therapy, or conformal radiation therapy and morbidity and disease control in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nathan C Sheets; Gregg H Goldin; Anne-Marie Meyer; Yang Wu; YunKyung Chang; Til Stürmer; Jordan A Holmes; Bryce B Reeve; Paul A Godley; William R Carpenter; Ronald C Chen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Late rectal bleeding after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. II. Volume effects and dose-volume histograms.

Authors:  A Jackson; M W Skwarchuk; M J Zelefsky; D M Cowen; E S Venkatraman; S Levegrun; C M Burman; G J Kutcher; Z Fuks; S A Liebel; C C Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Proton versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: patterns of care and early toxicity.

Authors:  James B Yu; Pamela R Soulos; Jeph Herrin; Laura D Cramer; Arnold L Potosky; Kenneth B Roberts; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Measuring complications of cancer treatment using the SEER-Medicare data.

Authors:  Arnold L Potosky; Joan L Warren; Elyn R Riedel; Carrie N Klabunde; Craig C Earle; Colin B Begg
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Erectile function, incontinence, and other quality of life outcomes following proton therapy for prostate cancer in men 60 years old and younger.

Authors:  Bradford S Hoppe; Romaine C Nichols; Randal H Henderson; Christopher G Morris; Christopher R Williams; Joseph Costa; Robert B Marcus; William M Mendenhall; Zuofeng Li; Nancy P Mendenhall
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  36 in total

1.  A Phase II Study to Prevent Radiation-induced Rectal Injury With Lovastatin.

Authors:  Mitchell S Anscher; Michael G Chang; Drew Moghanaki; Mihaela Rosu; Ross B Mikkelsen; Diane Holdford; Vicki Skinner; Baruch M Grob; Arun Sanyal; Aiping Wang; Nitai D Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 2.  Evolution of advanced technologies in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Amy S Harrison; Edouard J Trabulsi; Leonard G Gomella; Timothy N Showalter; Mark D Hurwitz; Adam P Dicker; Robert B Den
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Prostate cancer: Proton therapy--revolutionary advance or diminishing returns?

Authors:  Phillip J Gray; Jason A Efstathiou
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: comparison of toxicity.

Authors:  James B Yu; Laura D Cramer; Jeph Herrin; Pamela R Soulos; Arnold L Potosky; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Cost of New Technologies in Prostate Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy, Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy, and Proton Beam Therapy.

Authors:  Florian Rudolf Schroeck; Bruce L Jacobs; Sam B Bhayani; Paul L Nguyen; David Penson; Jim Hu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Comparative effectiveness study of patient-reported outcomes after proton therapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bradford S Hoppe; Jeff M Michalski; Nancy P Mendenhall; Christopher G Morris; Randal H Henderson; Romaine C Nichols; William M Mendenhall; Christopher R Williams; Meredith M Regan; Jonathan J Chipman; Catrina M Crociani; Howard M Sandler; Martin G Sanda; Daniel A Hamstra
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  A case-matched study of toxicity outcomes after proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Penny Fang; Rosemarie Mick; Curtiland Deville; Stefan Both; Justin E Bekelman; John P Christodouleas; Thomas J Guzzo; Zelig Tochner; Stephen M Hahn; Neha Vapiwala
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Assessment of acute bowel function after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Is it accurate enough?

Authors:  M Bonet; L Cayetano; M Núñez; E Jovell-Fernández; A Aguilar; Y Ribas
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer 101: basics, controversies, and facts.

Authors:  Eric S Wisenbaugh; Paul E Andrews; Robert G Ferrigni; Steven E Schild; Sameer R Keole; William W Wong; Sujay A Vora
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2014

10.  Recommendations for the referral of patients for proton-beam therapy, an Alberta Health Services report: a model for Canada?

Authors:  S Patel; X Kostaras; M Parliament; I A Olivotto; R Nordal; K Aronyk; N Hagen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.