Literature DB >> 23435552

The impact of handgrip exercise duty cycle on brachial artery flow-mediated dilation.

Trevor J King1, David J Slattery, Kyra E Pyke.   

Abstract

Endothelial function is essential for vasoprotection and regulation of vascular tone. Using handgrip exercise (HGEX) to increase blood flow-associated shear stress is an increasingly popular method for assessing brachial artery endothelial function via flow-mediated dilation (FMD). However, different exercise duty cycles [ratio of handgrip relaxation: contraction (seconds)] produce different patterns of brachial artery shear stress with distinct antegrade/retrograde magnitudes. To determine the impact of HGEX duty cycle on brachial artery %FMD, three distinct duty cycles were employed while maintaining a uniform mean shear stress. Brachial artery diameter and mean blood velocity were assessed via echo and Doppler ultrasound in 16 healthy male subjects. Shear stress was estimated as shear rate (SR = blood velocity/brachial artery diameter) and the target mean SR during HGEX was 75 s(-1). Subjects performed three 6-min HGEX trials on each of 2 days (like trials averaged). In each trial, subjects performed one of the three randomly ordered HGEX duty cycles (1:1, 3:1, 5:1). %FMD was calculated from baseline to the end of HGEX and (subset N = 10) during each minute of HGEX. Data are mean ± SD. As intended, mean SR was uniform across duty cycles (6 min HGEX average: 72.9 ± 4.9s(-1), 72.6 ± 3.6s(-1), 72.8 ± 3.5 s(-1), p = 0.835), despite differences in antegrade/retrograde SR (p < 0.001). End-exercise %FMD (4.0 ± 1.3 %, 4.1 ± 2.2 %, 4.2 ± 1.4 %, p = 0.860) and %FMD during exercise (p = 0.939) were not different between duty cycles. These data indicate that the endothelium responds to the mean shear stress and is not specifically sensitive to the contraction/relaxation or retrograde shear stress created by a range of HGEX protocols.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23435552     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-013-2612-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  31 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of flow-mediated dilation in humans: a methodological and physiological guideline.

Authors:  Dick H J Thijssen; Mark A Black; Kyra E Pyke; Jaume Padilla; Greg Atkinson; Ryan A Harris; Beth Parker; Michael E Widlansky; Michael E Tschakovsky; Daniel J Green
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Heterogeneous limb vascular responsiveness to shear stimuli during dynamic exercise in humans.

Authors:  D Walter Wray; Abhimanyu Uberoi; Lesley Lawrenson; Russell S Richardson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-02-17

3.  Are the dynamic response characteristics of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation sensitive to the magnitude of increase in shear stimulus?

Authors:  K E Pyke; J A Hartnett; M E Tschakovsky
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-05-08

4.  Heterogenous nature of flow-mediated dilatation in human conduit arteries in vivo: relevance to endothelial dysfunction in hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  M J Mullen; R K Kharbanda; J Cross; A E Donald; M Taylor; P Vallance; J E Deanfield; R J MacAllister
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2001-02-02       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Gαq/11-mediated intracellular calcium responses to retrograde flow in endothelial cells.

Authors:  Benoît Melchior; John A Frangos
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.249

6.  Flow-mediated vasodilation of the femoral and brachial artery induced by exercise in healthy nonsmoking and smoking men.

Authors:  H Gaenzer; G Neumayr; P Marschang; W Sturm; R Kirchmair; J R Patsch
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Progressive handgrip exercise: evidence of nitric oxide-dependent vasodilation and blood flow regulation in humans.

Authors:  D Walter Wray; Melissa A H Witman; Stephen J Ives; John McDaniel; Anette S Fjeldstad; Joel D Trinity; Jamie D Conklin; Mark A Supiano; Russell S Richardson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  The impact of baseline artery diameter on flow-mediated vasodilation: a comparison of brachial and radial artery responses to matched levels of shear stress.

Authors:  F Jazuli; K E Pyke
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.733

9.  Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  D S Celermajer; K E Sorensen; V M Gooch; D J Spiegelhalter; O I Miller; I D Sullivan; J K Lloyd; J E Deanfield
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Impact of shear rate modulation on vascular function in humans.

Authors:  Toni M Tinken; Dick H J Thijssen; Nicola Hopkins; Mark A Black; Ellen A Dawson; Christopher T Minson; Sean C Newcomer; M Harold Laughlin; N Timothy Cable; Daniel J Green
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 10.190

View more
  4 in total

1.  Attenuated forearm vascular conductance responses to rhythmic handgrip in young African-American compared with Caucasian-American men.

Authors:  Thales C Barbosa; Jasdeep Kaur; Brandi Y Stephens; John D Akins; David M Keller; R Matthew Brothers; Paul J Fadel
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 2.  Flow-mediated dilation stimulated by sustained increases in shear stress: a useful tool for assessing endothelial function in humans?

Authors:  Joshua C Tremblay; Kyra E Pyke
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Examining the acute effects of retrograde versus low mean shear rate on flow-mediated dilation.

Authors:  Joshua C Tremblay; Arman S Grewal; Kyra E Pyke
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-03-07

4.  Ramp and step increases in shear stress result in a similar magnitude of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation.

Authors:  Joshua C Tremblay; Jennifer S Williams; Kyra E Pyke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.078

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.