BACKGROUND: The impact of patient body mass index (BMI) on image-guided spine interventions remains unknown. Higher BMI is known to complicate the acquisition of radiographic images. Therefore it can be hypothesized that the patient's body habitus can influence the delivery of a spinal injection. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the impact of patient BMI on the length of fluoroscopy and procedure times during spine interventions. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of 2 prospective observational studies. SETTING: All injections were performed in an outpatient university setting. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 209 patients in whom spine injections were performed (99 women), with a mean age of 54.6 years. METHODS: The fluoroscopy times for 202 participants and total procedure times for 137 participants were recorded. Additional participant characteristics, including age, gender, BMI, and actual procedures performed, also were collected. Analysis of covariance and linear and nonlinear model analysis were performed to assess the effect of BMI on fluoroscopy and procedure times. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Fluoroscopy time and procedure duration times. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 54.6 years, 51% were men, and 77% (n = 155) were overweight (BMI ≥25). Participants received the following interventions: 40 zygapophyseal joint injections, 33 medial branch nerve blocks, 113 transforaminal epidural injections, and 16 combined zygapophyseal joint injections and epidural injections. Gender, procedure number, and procedure type did not differ between groups. The overweight group demonstrated a 30% increase in mean fluoroscopy time and a 35% increase in mean procedure time. Controlling for other variables, we found that differences in fluoroscopy time and procedure time were significant (P = .032 and P = .031, respectively) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly prolonged procedure time and fluoroscopy time in overweight patients increase the risks associated with spine interventions, not only to the patients but also to the operating room staff exposed to ionizing radiation.
BACKGROUND: The impact of patient body mass index (BMI) on image-guided spine interventions remains unknown. Higher BMI is known to complicate the acquisition of radiographic images. Therefore it can be hypothesized that the patient's body habitus can influence the delivery of a spinal injection. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the impact of patient BMI on the length of fluoroscopy and procedure times during spine interventions. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of 2 prospective observational studies. SETTING: All injections were performed in an outpatient university setting. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 209 patients in whom spine injections were performed (99 women), with a mean age of 54.6 years. METHODS: The fluoroscopy times for 202 participants and total procedure times for 137 participants were recorded. Additional participant characteristics, including age, gender, BMI, and actual procedures performed, also were collected. Analysis of covariance and linear and nonlinear model analysis were performed to assess the effect of BMI on fluoroscopy and procedure times. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Fluoroscopy time and procedure duration times. RESULTS:Participants had a mean age of 54.6 years, 51% were men, and 77% (n = 155) were overweight (BMI ≥25). Participants received the following interventions: 40 zygapophyseal joint injections, 33 medial branch nerve blocks, 113 transforaminal epidural injections, and 16 combined zygapophyseal joint injections and epidural injections. Gender, procedure number, and procedure type did not differ between groups. The overweight group demonstrated a 30% increase in mean fluoroscopy time and a 35% increase in mean procedure time. Controlling for other variables, we found that differences in fluoroscopy time and procedure time were significant (P = .032 and P = .031, respectively) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly prolonged procedure time and fluoroscopy time in overweight patients increase the risks associated with spine interventions, not only to the patients but also to the operating room staff exposed to ionizing radiation.
Authors: S R Boddu; A Corey; R Peterson; A M Saindane; P A Hudgins; Z Chen; X Wang; K E Applegate Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: James D Wylie; Michael P McClincy; Evan K Stieler; Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim; Christopher L Peters; Eduardo N Novais Journal: J Hip Preserv Surg Date: 2019-09-17