Literature DB >> 14507825

Biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects.

C Alvarez1, J A Castilla, L Martínez, J P Ramírez, F Vergara, J J Gaforio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to assess the components of biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects.
METHODS: Twenty donor candidates were included in a 10-week follow-up study. Within- and between-subject biological variation, indices of individuality and heterogeneity, coefficient of reliability, critical differences, analytical goals and the lowest value observed with a <5% probability of having a true value less than the World Health Organization (1999) reference value were estimated for the following seminal parameters: concentration, total motility (WHO grades a + b + c), progressive motility (grades a + b), rapid progressive motility (grade a), sperm morphology and vitality. All analysis was performed by a single technician according to WHO 1999 guidelines for routine semen analysis. Analytical variation was assessed on different types of quality control material (frozen straws, sperm suspension, videotape, and slides) and at different (low, medium, high) quality levels.
RESULTS: The analytical variation observed depended on the quality control material used and the level of semen quality. Concentration was the semen parameter with highest within- and between-subject variation, and vitality the lowest. Indices of individuality were all <0.7, and coefficients of reliability were high (0.68-0.84). The critical difference for sequential values significant at P < 0.05 for vitality, progressive motility and morphology (34.4, 49.2 and 58.0% respectively) were lower than for concentration (77.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: The study results showed that conventional reference values for seminal parameters have little diagnostic value because of their marked individuality, though seminal parameters can be useful for assessing differences in an individual's serial results, in particular of progressive motility, morphology and vitality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14507825     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  31 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of recent clinical practice guidelines and best practice statements for the evaluation of the infertile male.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Peter Chan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  External quality control program for semen analysis: Spanish experience.

Authors:  C Alvarez; J A Castilla; J P Ramírez; F Vergara; A Yoldi; A Fernández; J J Gaforio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Semen analysis standardization: is there any problem in Polish laboratories?

Authors:  Renata Walczak-Jedrzejowska; Katarzyna Marchlewska; Elzbieta Oszukowska; Eliza Filipiak; Leszek Bergier; Jolanta Slowikowska-Hilczer
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Single semen analysis as a predictor of semen quality: clinical and epidemiological implications.

Authors:  Lars Rylander; Boel Wetterstrand; Trine B Haugen; Gunilla Malm; Johan Malm; Cathrine Bjørsvik; Trine Henrichsen; Thomas Saether; Aleksander Giwercman
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Reproducibility and reliability of semen analysis in youths at risk for infertility.

Authors:  Matthew S Christman; Kate H Kraft; Gregory E Tasian; Stephen A Zderic; Thomas F Kolon
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Diagnosis and treatment of infertility-related male hormonal dysfunction.

Authors:  Martin Kathrins; Craig Niederberger
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  What Does a Single Semen Sample Tell You? Implications for Male Factor Infertility Research.

Authors:  Yu-Han Chiu; Regina Edifor; Bernard A Rosner; Feiby L Nassan; Audrey J Gaskins; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Paige L Williams; Cigdem Tanrikut; Russ Hauser; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  Engaging practicing gynecologists in the management of infertile men.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Alaa Hamada; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-11-05

Review 9.  Sperm DNA damage in male infertility: etiologies, assays, and outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan T Schulte; Dana A Ohl; Mark Sigman; Gary D Smith
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME): intervariation study of normal sperm and sperm with large nuclear vacuoles.

Authors:  João Batista A Oliveira; Claudia G Petersen; Fabiana C Massaro; Ricardo L R Baruffi; Ana L Mauri; Liliane F I Silva; Juliana Ricci; José G Franco
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.