OBJECTIVE: To assess the variability of antimüllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations in women with "adequate ovarian reserve" during unstimulated menstrual cycles and to determine the impact on clinical classifications. DESIGN: Pilot cohort study. SETTING: Private fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Twelve consecutive women (aged 29 to 43 years) referred to a fertility service, with AMH measurements repeated throughout unstimulated cycle, and who had at least one AMH measurement indicating "adequate ovarian reserve." INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): AMH concentrations assessed in 82 serum samples from 12 women compared against the published cutoffs for reduced ovarian reserve and for risk of excessive response to ovarian stimulation. RESULT(S): Over half the women (7 of 12) were reclassified as a result of testing AMH concentrations at different phases of the menstrual cycle. Over one-third (4 or 5 of 12) crossed a cutoff for reduced ovarian reserve; 2 of 12 crossed cutoffs predicting hyperstimulation. There was a statistically significant change in AMH concentration according to the day of the cycle, with a negative trend of the median AMH concentration from the follicular to luteal phase. The maximum change in median AMH concentration over cycle was 7.9 pmol/L, and the mean difference between the maximum and minimum AMH was 6.7 pmol/L. CONCLUSION(S): In this pilot study, the AMH concentration varied during menstrual cycle, and the clinical classification of the ovarian response was altered. Crown
OBJECTIVE: To assess the variability of antimüllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations in women with "adequate ovarian reserve" during unstimulated menstrual cycles and to determine the impact on clinical classifications. DESIGN: Pilot cohort study. SETTING: Private fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Twelve consecutive women (aged 29 to 43 years) referred to a fertility service, with AMH measurements repeated throughout unstimulated cycle, and who had at least one AMH measurement indicating "adequate ovarian reserve." INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): AMH concentrations assessed in 82 serum samples from 12 women compared against the published cutoffs for reduced ovarian reserve and for risk of excessive response to ovarian stimulation. RESULT(S): Over half the women (7 of 12) were reclassified as a result of testing AMH concentrations at different phases of the menstrual cycle. Over one-third (4 or 5 of 12) crossed a cutoff for reduced ovarian reserve; 2 of 12 crossed cutoffs predicting hyperstimulation. There was a statistically significant change in AMH concentration according to the day of the cycle, with a negative trend of the median AMH concentration from the follicular to luteal phase. The maximum change in median AMH concentration over cycle was 7.9 pmol/L, and the mean difference between the maximum and minimum AMH was 6.7 pmol/L. CONCLUSION(S): In this pilot study, the AMH concentration varied during menstrual cycle, and the clinical classification of the ovarian response was altered. Crown
Authors: Lisa M Pastore; Timothy L McMurry; Christopher D Williams; Valerie L Baker; Steven L Young Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Seungyoun Jung; Naomi Allen; Alan A Arslan; Laura Baglietto; Louise A Brinton; Brian L Egleston; Roni Falk; Renée T Fortner; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Annika Idahl; Rudolph Kaaks; Eva Lundin; Melissa Merritt; Charlotte Onland-Moret; Sabina Rinaldi; María-José Sánchez; Sabina Sieri; Helena Schock; Xiao-Ou Shu; Patrick M Sluss; Paul N Staats; Ruth C Travis; Anne Tjønneland; Antonia Trichopoulou; Shelley Tworoger; Kala Visvanathan; Vittorio Krogh; Elisabete Weiderpass; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Wei Zheng; Joanne F Dorgan Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: K A Kissell; M R Danaher; E F Schisterman; J Wactawski-Wende; K A Ahrens; K Schliep; N J Perkins; L Sjaarda; J Weck; S L Mumford Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Clarisa R Gracia; Sanghyuk S Shin; Maureen Prewitt; Janna S Chamberlin; Lori R Lofaro; Kristin L Jones; Marta Clendenin; Katherine E Manzanera; Dennis L Broyles Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Lauren N C Johnson; Mary D Sammel; Katherine E Dillon; Lara Lechtenberg; Allison Schanne; Clarisa R Gracia Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2014-06-14 Impact factor: 7.329